Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 399–408 | Cite as

High degree of paternity loss in a species with alternative reproductive tactics

  • Karen M. Cogliati
  • Bryan D. Neff
  • Sigal Balshine
Original Paper

Abstract

In many mating systems, males adopt alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) to maximize reproductive success. In fishes, guarding males often invest more energy into courtship, defense, and paternal care, whereas cuckolding males forego such costs and steal fertilizations by releasing their sperm in the nest of a guarding male. These two tactics have been documented in the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus), yet the relative reproductive success of the guarding and cuckolding male tactics remains unknown. In this study, we used microsatellite markers to determine the level of paternity of the guarding type I males. We explored how paternity varied with male phenotype and across the breeding season. Our results revealed the lowest documented levels of paternity in a species with obligate paternal care. Although paternity remained consistently low, it did increase as the breeding season progressed. Male body size did not significantly predict paternity. The low paternity in this species may be explained, in part, by aspects of their reproductive ecology including the duration of parental care period, limited nest availability and competition for nests, as well as the occurrence of nest takeovers. Overall, our findings contribute to the understanding of the ultimate factors underlying ARTs in this species and highlight the importance of investigating reproductive success across the entire breeding season.

Keywords

Reproductive strategies Temporal variation Nest takeovers Paternal care Plainfin midshipman Sneak fertilization 

References

  1. Alonzo SH, Heckman KL (2010) The unexpected but understandable dynamics of mating, paternity and paternal care in the ocellated wrasse. Proc R Soc B 277:115–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann SA, Wagner SS, Lenington S (1977) Two models for the evolution of polygyny. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arora HL (1948) Observations on the habits and early life history of the batrachoid fish, Porichthys notatus Girard. Copeia 1948:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA et al (2002) Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Genet 36:19–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balon EK (1999) Alternative ways to become a juvenile or a definitive phenotype (and on some persisting linguistic offenses). Environ Biol Fish 56:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bass AH (1992) Dimorphic male brains and alternative reproductive tactics in a vocalizing fish. Trends Neurosci 15:139–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackwell BG, Brown ML, Willis DW (2000) Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Rev Fish Sci 8:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brantley RK, Bass AH (1994) Alternative male spawning tactics and acoustic signals in the plainfin midshipman fish Porichthy notatus Girard (Teleostei, Batrachoididae). Ethology 96:213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantley RK, Marchaterre MA, Bass AH (1993) Androgen effects on vocal muscle structure in a teleost fish with inter- and intra-sexual dimorphism. J Morph 216:305–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bessert ML, Brozek J, Orti G (2007) Impact of nest substrate limitations on patterns of illegitimacy in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). J Hered 98:716–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brockman HJ, Nguyen C, Potts W (2000) Paternity in horseshoe crabs when spawning in multiple-male groups. Anim Behav 60:837–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cargnelli LM, Neff BD (2006) Condition-dependent nesting in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. J Anim Ecol 75:627–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guiness FE (1997) Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc R Soc B 264:1509–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman RM, Fischer RU (1991) Brood size, male fanning effort and the energetics of a nonshareable parental investment in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Ethology 87:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman RM, Gross MR (1991) Parental investment theory: the role of past investment. Trends Ecol Evol 6:404–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman RM, Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) Parental investment decision rules: a test in bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:59–66Google Scholar
  18. Coleman SW, Jones AG (2011) Patterns of multiple paternity and maternity in fishes. Biol J Linn Soc 103:735–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coltman D, Smith J, Bancroft D, Pilkington J, MacColl D, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton J (1999) Density-dependent variation in lifetime breeding success and natural and sexual selection in Soay rams. Am Nat 154:730–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crane JM Jr (1981) Feeding and growth by the sessile larvae of the teleost Porichthys notatus. Copeia 1981:895–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeMartini EE (1988) Spawning success of the male plainfin midshipman. I. Influences of male body size and area of spawning site. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 121:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeMartini EE (1990) Annual variations in fecundity, egg size and condition of the plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus). Copeia 1990:850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeMartini EE (1991) Spawning success of the male plainfin midshipman. II. Substratum as a limiting spatial resource. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 146:235–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeWoody JA, Fletcher DE, Wilkins SD, Avise JC (2000) Parentage and nest guarding in the tessellated darter (Etheostoma olmstedi) assayed by microsatellite markers (Perciformes: Percidae). Copeia 2000:740–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dugatkin LA (1992) Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat 139:1384–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fechhelm RG, Griffiths WB, Wilson WJ, Gallaway BJ, Bryan JD (1995) Intra- and interseasonal changes in the relative condition and proximate body composition of broad whitefish from the Prudhoe Bay Region of Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 124:508–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forsgren E, Kvarnemo C, Lindström K (1996) Mode of sexual selection determined by resource abundance in two sand goby populations. Evolution 50:646–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foster WA, Treherne HE (1981) Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293:456–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross MR (1980) Sexual selection and the evolution of reproductive strategies in sunfishes (Lepomis: Centrarchidae). Dissertation, University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubbs CL (1920) The bionomics of Porichthy notatus Girard. Am Nat 54:380–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ibara RM, Penny LT, Ebeling AW, van Dykhuizen G, Caillet G (1983) The mating call of the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus. In: Ward JA (ed) Predators and prey in fishes. Dr W Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones AG, Small CM, Paczolt KA, Ratterman NL (2010) A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 10:6–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones OR, Wang J (2010) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour 10:551–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Ohtonen A, Bailey S, Burke T (2002) High frequency of polyandry in a lek mating system. Behav Ecol 13:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee JSF, Bass AH (2004) Does exaggerated morphology preclude plasticity to cuckoldry in the midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus). Naturwissenschaften 91:338–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller DJ, Lea RN (1972) Fish Bulletin 157: guide to the coastal marine fishes of California. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, pp 72–73Google Scholar
  38. Møller AP (2000) Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav Ecol 11:161–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Møller AP, Thornhill R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim Behav 55:1507–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neff BD (2001) Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J Hered 92:111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neff BD, Clare EL (2008) Temporal variation in cuckoldry and paternity in two sunfish species (Lepomis spp.) with alternative reproductive tactics. Can J Zool 86:92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR (2000a) Parentage analysis with incomplete sampling of candidate parents and offspring. Mol Ecol 9:515–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neff BD, Repka J, Gross MR (2000b) Statistical confidence in parentage analyses with incomplete sampling: how many loci and offspring are needed? Mol Ecol 9:529–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliveira RF, Almada VC, Forsgren E, Gonçalves EJ (1999) Temporal variation in male traits, nesting aggregations and mating success in the peacock blenny. J Fish Biol 54:499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter BA, Fiumera AC, Avise JC (2002) Egg mimicry and allopaternal care: two mate attracting tactics by which nesting striped darter (Etheostoma virgatum) males enhance reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ridley M, Rechten C (1981) Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rohwer S (1978) Parent cannibalism of offspring and egg raiding as a courtship strategy. Am Nat 112:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schultz ET (1993) The effect of birth date on fitness of female dwarf perch, Micrometrus minimus. Evolution 47:520–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sefc KM, Hermann CM, Koblmüller S (2009) Mating system variability in a mouthbrooding cichlid fish from a tropical lake. Mol Ecol 18:3508–3517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shuster SM (1989) Male alternative reproductive strategies in a marine isopod crustacean (Paracerceis sculpta): the use of genetic markers to measure differences in fertilization success among α-, β-, and γ-males. Evolution 43:1683–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sisneros JA, Alderks PW, Leon K, Sniffen B (2009) Morphometric changes associated with the reproductive cycle and behaviour of the intertidal-nesting, male plainfin midshipman Porichthys notatus. J Fish Biol 74:18–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Suk HY, Neff BD, Fitzpatrick JL, Balshine S (2009) Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the plain midshipman fish. Hereditas 146:001–004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taborsky M, Oliveira RF, Brockman HJ (2008) The evolution of alternative reproductive tactics: concepts and questions. In: Oliveira RF, Taborsky M, Brockman HJ (eds) Alternative reproductive tactics. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verhulst S, van Balen JH, Tinbergen JM (1995) Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 76:2392–2403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1992) Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behav Ecol 4:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen M. Cogliati
    • 1
  • Bryan D. Neff
    • 2
  • Sigal Balshine
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and BehaviourMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations