Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 69–78 | Cite as

Do fledglings choose wisely? An experimental investigation into social foraging behaviour

  • A. M. ThompsonEmail author
  • A. R. Ridley
Original Paper


Many cooperative bird species have an extended period of post-fledging care. Despite the fact that this period of care can last up to several months, it remains a relatively understudied stage of chick development. This period, when young are actively begging but highly mobile, provides an opportunity for young to maximise the amount of care they receive by selectively choosing particular adults to beg from. In pied babblers Turdoides bicolor (a cooperatively breeding passerine), fledglings closely follow foraging adults and beg for food regularly (a behavioural interaction termed social foraging). Using a combination of natural observations and experimental manipulations, we found that fledgling pied babblers preferentially socially forage with adult care-givers who have high foraging success, since this results in young receiving more food. By supplementally feeding adults to artificially increase their foraging success, we increased the proportion of time that fledglings chose to socially forage with them, confirming that fledglings are selectively choosing dyadic interactions with the best adult foragers. These results indicate that pied babbler fledglings are sensitive to and can respond to short-term changes in adult foraging success, enabling them to maximize their nutritional intake, a behavioural adjustment that has long-term benefits in this system.


Social foraging Provisioning Foraging associations Cooperatively breeding Pied babblers Foraging success 



We thank the British Ecological Society and the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute for funding this research. We are grateful to Prof. Tim Clutton-Brock and Prof. Marta Manser for the use of the facilities and land access at the Kuruman River Reserve, and the De Bruins and Kotzes for allowing us access to their land. We thank Prof. Phil Hockey for his continued support of the Pied Babbler Research Project and Mike Finnie for his support in this research. Comments from three anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript.

Ethical standards

The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of South Africa. This research was conducted under the ethical clearance from the Science Faculty Animal Ethics Board, University of Cape Town (R2012/2006/V15/AR) and with research permits being issued by the Northern Cape Conservation Authority.

Supplementary material

265_2012_1426_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (179 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 178 kb)


  1. Bell MBV, Radford AN, Rose R, Wade HM, Ridley AR (2009) The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2997–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson H, Rydén O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behaviour in asynchronously hatched broods of great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boland CRJ, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A (1997) Experimental manipulation of brood reduction and parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. J Anim Ecol 66:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP (2011) AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH, O’Riain MJ, Brotherton PNM, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Griffin AS, Manser M (1999) Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science 284:1640–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, O’Riain MJ, Griffin AS, Gaynor D, Kansky R, Sharpe L, McIlrath GM (2001) Contributions to cooperative rearing in meerkats. Anim Behav 61:705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from noisy neighbours to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eggers S, Griesser M, Ekman J (2004) Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). Behav Ecol 16:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilchrist JS (2004) Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: behaviour, benefits, and maintenance. Behav Ecol 15:952–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilchrist JS (2008) Aggressive monopolization of mobile carers by young of a cooperative breeder. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2491–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfray HCJ (1995) Signalling of need between parents and young: parent-offspring conflict and sibling rivalry. Am Nat 146:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golabek KA, Ridley AR, Radford AN (2011) Food availability affects strength of seasonal territorial behaviour in a cooperatively breeding bird. Anim Behav 83:613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson JG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:107–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinsohn RG (1991) Slow learning of foraging skills and extended parental care in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs. Am Nat 137:864–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodge SJ (2005) Helpers benefit offspring in both the short and long-term in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:2479–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodge SJ, Flower TP, Clutton-Brock TH (2007) Offspring competition and helper associations in cooperative meerkats. Anim Behav 74:957–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Juliano SA, Gravel ME (2002) Predation and the evolution of prey behaviour: an experiment with the tree hole mosquitoes. Behav Ecol 13:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kacelnik A, Cotton PA, Stirling L, Wright J (1995) Food allocation among nestling starlings: sibling competition and the scope of parental choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 259:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz PL (1974) A long-term approach to foraging optimization. Am Nat 108:758–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilner R (1995) When do canary parents respond to nestling signals of need? Proc R Soc Lond B 260:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langen TA (1996) Social learning of a novel foraging skill by white-throated magpie-jays (Calocitta Formosa, Corvidae): a field experiment. Ethology 102:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langen TA (2000) Prolonged offspring dependence and cooperative breeding in birds. Behav Ecol 11:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langen TA, Vehrencamp SL (1999) How white-throated magpie-jay helpers contribute during breeding. Auk 116:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leedman AW, Magrath RD (2003) Long-term brood division and exclusive parental care in a cooperatively breeding passerine. Anim Behav 65:1093–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manser MB, Avey G (2000) The effect of pup vocalisations on food allocation in a cooperative mammal, the meerkat (Suricata suricatta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manser MB, Madden JR, Kunc HP, English S, Clutton-Brock TH (2008) Signals of need in a cooperatively breeding mammal with mobile offspring. Anim Behav 76:1805–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGowan KJ, Woolfenden GE (1990) Contributions to fledgling feeding in the Florida scrub-jay. J Anim Ecol 59:691–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Midford PE, Hailman JP, Woolfenden GE (2000) Social learning of a novel foraging patch in families of free-living Florida scrub-jays. Anim Behav 59:1199–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mock DW, Parker GA (1998) Siblicide, Family conflict and the evolutionary limits of selfishness. Anim Behav 56:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Radford AN, Ridley AR (2006) Recruitment calling: a novel form of extended parental care in an altricial species. Curr Biol 16:1700–1704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raihani NJ (2008) Cooperation and conflict in pied babblers. Dissertation, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2007a) Adult vocalisations during provisioning: offspring response and postfledging benefits in wild pied babblers. Anim Behav 74:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2007b) Parental aggression against dependent young results in task partitioning in a cooperative bird. Biol Lett 4:24–26Google Scholar
  37. Raihani NJ, Ridley AR (2008) Experimental evidence for teaching in wild pied babblers. Anim Behav 75:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raihani NJ, Ridley AR, Browning LE, Nelson-Flower MJ, Knowles S (2008) Juvenile female aggression in cooperatively breeding pied babblers: causes and contexts. Ethology 114:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ridley AR (2007) Factors affecting offspring survival and development in a cooperative bird: social, maternal and environmental effects. J Anim Ecol 76:750–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2007a) Variable post-fledgling care in a cooperative bird: causes and consequences. Behav Ecol 18:994–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2007b) Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler. Behav Ecol 18:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ridley AR, Raihani NJ (2008) Task partitioning increases reproductive output in a cooperative bird. Behav Ecol 19:1136–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ridley AR, Thompson AM (2011) Heterospecific egg destruction by the wattled starling and its impact on pied babbler reproductive success. Ostrich 82:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell EM (2000) Avian life histories: is extended parental care a southern secret? Emu 100:377–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell AF, Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Sharpe LL, McIlrath GM, Dalerum FD, Cameron EZ, Barnard JA (2002) Factors affecting pup growth and survival in co-operatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta. J Anim Ecol 71:700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell EM, Yom-Tov Y, Geffen E (2004) Extended parental care and delayed dispersal: northern, tropical and southern passerines compared. Behav Ecol 15:831–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sankamethawee W, Gale GA, Hardesty BE (2009) Post-fledging survival of the cooperatively breeding puff-throated bulbul (Alophoixus pallidus). Condor 111:675–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suedkamp Wells KM, Ryan MR, Millspaugh JJ, Thompson FR III, Hubbard MW (2007) Survival of postfledging grassland birds in Missouri. Condor 109:781–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Symonds MRE, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tarwater CE, Brawn JD (2010) The post-fledging period in a tropical bird: pattern of parental care and survival. J Avian Biol 41:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Terkel J (1994) Social transmission of pine cone feeding behaviour in the black rat. In: Galef BG, Mainardi M, Valsecchi P (eds) Behavioral aspects of feeding. Harwood Academic, Chur, pp 229–256Google Scholar
  52. Terkel J (1995) Cultural transmission in the black rat. Adv Study Behav 24:119–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thornton A (2008) Early body condition, time budgets and the acquisition of foraging skills in meerkats. Anim Behav 75:951–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornton A, Hodge SJ (2009) The development of foraging microhabitat preferences in meerkats. Behav Ecol 20:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton A, McAuliffe K (2006) Teaching in wild meerkats. Science 313:227–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST/NRF Centre of ExcellenceUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations