Sex-specific plasticity in brain morphology depends on social environment of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata
- 924 Downloads
The vertebrate brain is a remarkably plastic organ, which responds quickly to environmental changes. However, to date, studies investigating plasticity in brain morphology have focused mostly on the physical properties of the surrounding environment, and little is known about brain plasticity in response to the social environment. Moreover, sex differences in brain plasticity remain virtually unexplored. Here, we tested how the social environment influenced brain morphology in adult males and females using experimental manipulation of the sex composition of social pairs (same sex vs. mixed sex) in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). We detected substantial sex-specific plasticity in both the overall brain size (controlling for body size) and separate brain structures. The brain size was larger in males that interacted with females, and female optic tectum was larger in female-only groups. Overall, females had larger olfactory bulbs and cerebellum in comparison to males. While net sexual dimorphism in the brain structure can be explained in light of the known differences in boldness and foraging behaviour between the sexes, our results also support that cognitive demands associated with courtship behaviour can lead to plastic changes in the brain size. Our findings demonstrate that not only social environment can generate rapid, plastic responses in the vertebrate brain but also that such responses can depend strongly on sex.
KeywordsNeural development Plasticity Social interactions Sexual selection Sexual dimorphism Guppy Poecilia reticulata
This study was funded by grants from the Swedish Research Council (for NK and AAM), Carl Trygger Foundation (for NK) and ERC (for AAM).
All performed experiments comply with the Swedish law and were approved by the Uppsala ethics committee.
- Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Bell AM, Foster SA (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B 57:289–300Google Scholar
- Braithwaite VA (2006) Cognitive ability in fish. In: Sloman KA, Wilson RW, Balshine S (eds) Behaviour and physiology of fish. Fish physiology, vol 24. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–38Google Scholar
- Houde A (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Liley NR (1966) Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes. Behaviour, Suppl 13:1–197Google Scholar
- Nieuwenhuys R, ten Donkelaar HJ, Nicholson C (1998) The cenrtral nervous system of vertebrates. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- Striedter GF (2005) Principles of brain evolution. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- van Staaden MJ, Huber R, Kaufmann LS, Liem KF (1995) Brain evolution in cichlids of the African Great Lakes: brain and body size, general patterns and evolutionary trends. Zoology 98:165–178Google Scholar