Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 66, Issue 9, pp 1333–1340 | Cite as

Rhythmic male reproductive behavior controls timing of courtship and mating in Laupala cerasina

  • Tagide N. deCarvalhoEmail author
  • Daniel J. Fergus
  • Rayna C. Bell
  • Kerry L. Shaw
Original Paper


In many organisms, mating behavior occurs at a particular time of day, which may be important for avoiding mate competition or interspecific mating. Crickets of the Hawaiian genus Laupala exhibit an unusually protracted courtship in which males produce a series of nuptial gifts prior to the species-typical time of mating. Mating time is one of several rhythmic behaviors that have diverged among closely related Laupala species, which exhibit an extremely high speciation rate. Mating rhythm may reflect direct selection on male and/or female sexual receptivity or the pleiotropic consequence of selection on other rhythmic behaviors. To examine the role of sexual rhythmicity in Laupala cerasina, we characterized the time boundaries or “circadian gate” of courtship and mating, as well as female phonotactic response to male song. We also examined which sex is responsible for mating rhythmicity by phase-shifting males relative to the female photophase. Our results demonstrate that mating behavior is gated by the end of the light phase. Time limits to female mating receptivity were not observed and thus male rhythm alone appears to be responsible for the timing of mating. Furthermore, when courtship is initiated later in the day, males produce fewer nuptial gifts and increase nuptial gift production rate while delaying mating, suggesting that the number of gifts a female receives is important to male reproductive success.


Laupala Mating behavior Reproductive isolation Nuptial gift Circadian rhythm Courtship 



We thank Kevin Oh for the statistical consultation, and Brian Coyle and Daniel Gorelick for their helpful comments on the manuscript.


  1. Calos JB, Sakaluk SK (1998) Paternity of offspring in multiply-mated female crickets: the effect of nuptial food gifts and the advantage of mating first. Proc R Soc B 265:2191–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Danley PD, deCarvalho TN, Fergus DJ, Shaw KL (2007) Reproductive asynchrony and the divergence of Hawaiian crickets. Ethol 113:1125–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2005) Nuptial feeding of spermless spermatophores in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket, Laupala pacifica (Gryllidae: Trigonidiinae). Naturwissenshaften 92:483–487Google Scholar
  4. deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2010) Elaborate courtship enhances sperm transfer in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket, Laupala cerasina. Anim Behav 79:819–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fergus DF, deCarvalho TN, Shaw KL (2011) Genetically regulated temporal variation of novel courtship elements in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Behav Genet 41:607–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Loher W (1974) Circadian control of spermatophore formation in cricket Teleogryllus commodus Walker. J Insect Physiol 20:1155–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Loher W (1989) Temporal organization of reproductive behavior. In: Huber F, Moore TE, Loher W (eds) Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 83–113Google Scholar
  8. Miyatake T (2002) Circadian rhythm and time of mating in Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) selected for age at reproduction. Heredity 88:302–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nowosielski JW, Patton RL (1963) Studies on circadian rhythm of the house cricket, Gryllus domesticus L. J Insect Physiol 9:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pittendrigh C, Skopik SD (1970) Circadian systems, V. The driving oscillation and the temporal sequence of development. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 65:500–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sakai T, Ishida N (2001) Circadian rhythms of female mating activity governed by clock genes in Drosophila. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 98:9221–9225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shaw KL, Herlihy DP (2000) Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proc R Soc B 267:577–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaw KL, Khine AH (2004) Courtship behavior of the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina: males provide spermless spermatophores as nuptial gifts. Ethol 110:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Silvegren G, Lofstedt C, Rosen WQ (2005) Circadian mating activity and effect of pheromone pre-exposure on pheromone response rhythms in the moth Spodoptera littoralis. J Insect Physiol 51:277–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Walker T (1983) Diel patterns of calling in nocturnal Orthoptera. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview, Boulder, pp 45–72Google Scholar
  17. Wang Q, Zeng W, Chen L, Li JS, Yin X (2002) Circadian reproductive rhythms, pair-bonding, and evidence for sex-specific pheromones in Nadezhdiella cantori (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 15:527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zuk M (1987) The effects of gregarine parasites, body size, and time of day on spermatophore production and sexual selection in field crickets. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tagide N. deCarvalho
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniel J. Fergus
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rayna C. Bell
    • 4
  • Kerry L. Shaw
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of EmbryologyCarnegie Institution for ScienceBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations