Racial mixing in South African honeybees: the effects of genotype mixing on reproductive traits of workers
- 197 Downloads
To test the hypothesis that the honeybee hybrid zone in South Africa is a tension zone due to increased reproductive conflict in colonies that contain both Apis mellifera capensis and Apis mellifera scutellata worker genotypes, we constructed mixed subspecies and hybrid colonies via a combination of artificial and natural matings. We measured emergence weight, ovary activation, and the presence/absence of a spermatheca on workers of different genotypes. We show that the measured characteristics were all affected by genotype with some traits also affected by the social environment in which the worker was reared. Workers with both an A. m. capensis mother and father had the highest emergence weight. When workers had an A. m. capensis mother, paternity affected emergence weight with A. m. capensis fathers producing heavier workers. When the queen was A. m. scutellata, paternity had less effect on weight. Presence of spermatheca was highest in mixed colonies irrespective of maternity and colonies containing pure A. m. capensis workers only. Paternity had a significant effect on the presence of a spermatheca within mixed colonies, with workers that had an A. m. capensis father being more likely to possess a spermatheca. Rates of ovary activation were highest in colonies with an A. m. scutellata queen mated to drones of both genotypes, suggesting that mixed subspecies colonies likely suffer increased reproductive strife among workers. Our results provide support for the hypothesis that the South African honeybee hybrid zone is a tension zone arising from reduced fitness of genetically mixed colonies.
KeywordsApis mellifera capensis Apis mellifera scutellata Hybrid zone Tension zone Reproductive conflict Social parasitism Worker reproduction
We thank Christian Fransman for his indispensable help in the field. This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology-National Research Fund Centre of Excellence (to TCW), the Australian Research Council (grant number DP0878924 to BPO and MB) and the University of Sydney (to MB).
- Allsopp MH (1992) The Capensis calamity. South African Bee J 64(3):52–57Google Scholar
- Allsopp MH (1993) Summarized overview of the Capensis problem. South African Bee J 65:127–136Google Scholar
- Arnold G, LeConte Y, Trouiller J, Hervet H, Chappe B, Masson C (1994) Inhibition of worker honeybee ovaries development by a mixture of fatty acid esters from larvae. C R Acad Sci Paris 317:511–515Google Scholar
- Dade HA (1977) Anatomy and dissection of the honeybee. International Bee Research Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hepburn HR, Jacot Guillarmod A (1991) The Cape honeybee and the fynbos biome. South African J Sci 87:70–73Google Scholar
- Hepburn HR, Radloff SE (1998) Honeybees of Africa. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Mackensen O (1943) The occurrence of parthenogenetic females in some strains of honeybees. J Econ Ent 36(3):465–467Google Scholar
- Onions GW (1914) South African ‘fertile worker bees’. South African Ag J 7:44–46Google Scholar
- Ruttner F (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honey bees. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar