Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 711–720 | Cite as

Better the nest site you know: decision-making during nest migrations by the Pharaoh’s ant

  • Sophie E. F. Evison
  • Katie A. Webster
  • William O. H. Hughes
Original Paper

Abstract

Animals frequently have to decide between alternative resources and in social insects these individual choices produce a colony-level decision. The choice of nest site is a particularly critical decision for a social insect colony to make, but the decision making process has still only been studied in a few species. In this study, we investigated nest selection by the Pharaoh’s ant, Monomorium pharaonis, a species renowned for its propensity to migrate and its use of multi-component trail pheromones to organise decision-making in other contexts. When presented with the choice of familiar and novel nests of equal quality in a Y set-up, colonies preferentially migrated towards the familiar nest, suggesting a form of colony-level ‘memory’ of potential nest sites. However, if the novel nest was superior to the familiar nest, then colonies began migrating initially to the familiar nest, but then redirected their migration to the superior quality novel nest. This may be an effective method of reducing colony exposure while searching for an optimum nest site. Branches that had previously led to a selected nest were attractive to ants in subsequent migrations, suggesting that trail pheromones mediate the decision making process. The adaptive, pheromone-based organisation of nest-site selection by Pharaoh’s ants matches their ephemeral environment and is likely to contribute to their success as a 'tramp' species.

Keywords

Latent learning Social insect Pheromone Nest site selection Trail 

References

  1. Bartholomew GA, Lighton JRB, Feener DH (1988) Energetics of trail running, load carriage, and emigration in the column-raiding army ant Eciton hamatum. Physiol Zool 61:57–68Google Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M (2010) lme4: Linear Mixed Effects Models Using S4 Classes. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/pachages/lme4/
  3. Blumstein DT, Bouskila A (1996) Assessment and decision making in animals: a mechanistic model underlying behavioral flexibility can prevent ambiguity. Oikos 77:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boomsma JJ, Franks NR (2006) Social insects: from selfish genes to self organisation and beyond. Trends Ecol Evol 21:303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devigne C, Detrain C (2002) Collective exploration and area marking in the ant Lasius niger. Insect Soc 49:357–362Google Scholar
  8. Faraway JJ (2006) Extending the linear model with R: generalised linear mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  9. Fourcassie V, Deneubourg JL (1994) The dynamics of collective exploration and trail-formation in Monomorium pharaonis: experiments and model. Physiol Entomol 19:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franks N, Hooper J, Dornhaus A, Aukett P, Hayward A, Berghoff S (2007) Reconnaissance and latent learning in ants. Proc R Soc B 74:1505–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Fitzsimmons JP, Stevens M (2003a) Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proc R Soc B 270:2457–2463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franks NR, Mallon EB, Bray HE, Hamilton MJ, Mischler TC (2003b) Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Anim Behav 65:215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Best CS, Jones EL (2006) Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all. Anim Behav 72:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franks NR, Hardcastle KA, Collins S, Smith FD, Sullivan KME, Robinson EJH, Sendova-Franks AB (2008) Can ant colonies choose a far-and-away better nest over an in-the-way poor one? Anim Behav 76:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Metherell BG, Nelson TR, Lanfear SAJ, Symes WS (2005) Not everything that counts can be counted: ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proc R Soc B 273P:165–169Google Scholar
  16. Healey CIM, Pratt SC (2008) The effect of prior experience on nest site evaluation by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus. Anim Behav 76:893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson DE, Châline N (2007) Modulation of pheromone trail strength with food quality in Pharaoh's ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Anim Behav 74:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature 432:907–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson DE, Martin SJ, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Longevity and detection of persistent foraging trails in Pharaoh's ants, Monomorium pharaonis (L.). Anim Behav 71:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson DE, Martin SJ, Ratnieks FLW, Holcombe M (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in pheromone composition of ant foraging trails. Behav Ecol 18:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson D, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Communication in ants. Curr Biol 16:R570–R574Google Scholar
  23. Jeanson R, Ratnieks FLW, Deneubourg JL (2003) Pheromone trail decay rates on different substrates in the Pharaoh's ant, Monomorium pharaonis. Physiol Entomol 28:192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller L, Cherix D, Ulloa-Chacon P (1989) Description of a new artificial diet for rearing ant colonies as Iridomyrmex humilis, Monomorium pharaonis and Wasmannia auropunctata (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Insect Soc 36:348–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krebs JR, Kacelnik A (1993) Decision-making. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, London, pp 105–136Google Scholar
  26. Mallon E, Pratt S, Franks N (2001) Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mallon EB, Franks NR (2000) Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle. Proc R Soc B 267:765–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLeman MA, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2002) Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Insect Soc 49:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Planqué R, Dornhaus A, Franks N, Kovacs T, Marshall J (2007) Weighting waiting in collective decision-making. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson EJH, Green K, Jenner E, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Decay rates of attractive and repellent pheromones in an ant foraging trail network. Insect Soc 55:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robinson EJH, Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2005) 'No entry' signal in ant foraging. Nature 438:442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson EJH, Smith FD, Sullivan KME, Franks NR (2009) Do ants make direct comparisons? Proc R Soc B 276:2635–2641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (1999) Group decision making in swarms of honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the "best-of-N" decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroeymeyt N, Franks NR, Giurfa M (2011a) Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants. J Exp Biol 214:3046–3054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stroeymeyt N, Giurfa M, Franks NR (2010) Improving decision speed, accuracy and group cohesion through early information gathering in house-hunting ants. PLoS One 5:e13059. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013059 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroeymeyt N, Robinson EJH, Hogan PM, Marshall JAR, Giurfa M, Francks NR (2011b) Experience-dependent flexibility in collective decision making by house-hunting ants. Behav Ecol 22:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sudd JH (1960) The foraging method of the Pharaoh's ant. Anim Behav 8:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sumpter DJT, Beekman M (2003) From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants. Anim Behav 66:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC (2009) Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Traniello JFA (1989) Chemical trail systems, orientation, and territorial interactions in the ant Lasius neoniger. J Insect Behav 2:339–354Google Scholar
  44. Visscher PK (2007) Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 52:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood S (2011) Generalized Additive Mixed Models using lme4 and mgcv. Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/pachages/lme4/
  46. Yamaoka R, Akino T (1994) Ecological importance of cuticular hydrocarbons secreted from the tarsus of ants. In: Lenoir A, Arnold G, Lepage M (eds) Les Insectes Sociaux. Université Paris-Nord, Paris, p 222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie E. F. Evison
    • 1
  • Katie A. Webster
    • 1
  • William O. H. Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Integrative and Comparative Biology, Faculty of Biological SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations