Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 12, pp 2341–2349 | Cite as

Competition and cooperation: bumblebee spatial organization and division of labor may affect worker reproduction late in life

  • Jennifer M. JandtEmail author
  • Anna Dornhaus
Original Paper


Within-group conflict may influence the degree to which individuals within a group cooperate. For example, the most dominant individuals within a group often gain access to the best resources and may be less inclined to perform risky tasks. We monitored space use and division of labor among all workers in three colonies of bumblebees, Bombus impatiens, during the ergonomic and queenless phases of their colony cycle. We then measured the two largest oocytes in each worker to estimate each individual's reproductive potential at the end of the colony cycle. We show that workers that remained farther from the queen while inside the nest and avoided risky or more energy-expensive tasks during the ergonomic phase developed larger oocytes by the end of the colony cycle. These individuals also tended to be the largest, oldest workers. After the queen died, these workers were more likely than their nestmates to increase brood incubation. Our results suggest that inactive bumblebees may be storing fat reserves to later develop reproductive organs and that the spatial organization of workers inside the nest, particularly the distance workers maintain from the queen, may predict which individuals will later have the greatest reproductive potential in the colony.


Division of labor Ovary Reproductive potential Spatial organization Worker competition 



We thank Nicolas Skye Robbins, Eden Huang, Amanda Barth, and Wendy Isner for their help in data collection, bumblebee dissections, and assistance with bumblebee maintenance. Margaret Couvillon, Scott Powell, and Aimee Dunlap provided feedback on the manuscript and statistical analyses. We also thank Laurent Keller and two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments and suggestions. Research supported through the College of Science, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, and NSF grant to AD (grant no. IOS 0841756).


  1. Alaux C, Jaisson P, Hefetz A (2004) Queen influence on worker reproduction in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) colonies. Insectes Sociaux 51:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayasse M, Marlovits T, Tengö J, Taghizadeh T, Francke W (1995) Are there pheromonal dominance signals in the bumblebee Bombus hypnorum L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae)? Apidologie 26:163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloch G, Hefetz A (1999a) Reevaluation of the role of mandibular glands in regulation of reproduction in bumblebee colonies. J Chem Ecol 25:881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloch G, Hefetz A (1999b) Regulation of reproduction by dominant workers in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) queenright colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourke AFG (1994) Worker matricide in social bees and wasps. J Theor Biol 167:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourke AFG, Ratnieks FLW (1999) Kin conflict over caste determination in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridge C, Field J (2007) Queuing for dominance: gerontocracy and queue-jumping in the hover wasp Liostenogaster flavolineata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1253–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron SA (1989) Temporal patterns of division of labor among workers in the primitively eusocial bumble bee, Bombus griseocollis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ethology 80:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cant MA, Field J (2001) Helping effort and future fitness in cooperative animal societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1959–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cant MA, Field J (2005) Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy. Behav Ecol 16:708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clémencet J, Rome Q, Fédérici P, Doums C (2008) Aggressions and size-related fecundity of queenless workers in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Naturwissenschaften 95:133–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cnaani J, Schmid-Hempel R, Schmidt JO (2002) Colony development, larval development and worker reproduction in Bombus impatiens Cresson. Insectes Sociaux 49:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cole BJ (1986) The social behavior of Leptothorax allardycei (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): time budgets and the evolution of worker reproduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couvillon MJ, Dornhaus A (2009) Location, location, location: larvae position inside the nest is correlated with adult body size in worker bumble-bees (Bombus impatiens). Proc R Soc Lond B 276:2411–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cronin AL, Field J (2007) Rank and colony defense against conspecifics in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp. Behav Ecol 18:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duchateau MJ, Velthuis HHW (1989) Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 51:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fénéron R, Durand J-L, Jaisson P (1996) Relation between behaviour and physiological maturation in a ponerine ant. Behaviour 133:791–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster RL, Brunskill A, Verdirame D, O’Donnell S (2004) Reproductive physiology, dominance interactions, and division of labour among bumble bee workers. Physiological Entomology 29:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Free JB (1955) The behaviour of egg-laying workers of bumblebee colonies. Br J Anim Behav 3:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geva S, Hartfelder K, Bloch G (2005) Reproductive division of labor, dominance, and ecdysteroid levels in hemolymph and ovary of the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. J Insect Physiol 51:811–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC, Hughes WOH (2002) Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav 64:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hemelrijk CK (2000) Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav 59:1035–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hemelrijk CK (2002) Understanding social behaviour with the help of complexity science. Ethology 108:655–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Human H, Nicolson SW, Dietemann V (2006) Do honeybees, Apis mellifera scutellata, regulate humidity in their nest? Naturwissenschaften 93:397–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labour in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jandt JM, Huang E, Dornhaus A (2009) Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:1829–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Judd TM (2000) Division of labour in colony defence against vertebrate predators by the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Anim Behav 60:55–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keller L, Nonacs P (1993) The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? Anim Behav 45:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Korb J (2003) Thermoregulation and ventilation of termite mounds. Naturwissenschaften 90:212–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Korb J, Schmidinger S (2004) Help or disperse? Cooperation in termites influenced by food conditions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin H, Winston ML, Haunderland NH, Slessor KN (1999) Influence of age and population size on ovarian development, and of trophallaxis on ovarian development and vitellogenin titres of queenless worker honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). The Canadian Entomologist 131:695–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. W.H. Freeman, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Molina Y, O’Donnell S (2009) Worker reproductive competition affects division of labor in a primitively social paperwasp (Polistes instabilis). Insectes Sociaux 56:14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Donnell S (2001) Worker age, ovary development, and temporal polyethism in the swarm-founding wasp Polybia occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 14:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Donnell S, Jeanne RL (1995) Implications of senescence patterns for the evolution of age polyethism in eusocial insects. Behav Ecol 6:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Donnell S, Reichardt M, Foster R (2000) Individual and colony factors in bumble bee division of labor (Bombus bifarius nearcticus Handl; Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insectes Sociaux 47:164–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Payne CM, Laverty TM, Lachance MA (2003) The frequency of multiple paternity in bumble bee (Bombus) colonies based on microsatellite DNA at the B10 locus. Insectes Sociaux 50:375–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pepper JW, Herron MD (2008) Does biology need an organism concept? Biol Rev 83:621–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1981) Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: a disposable caste? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell S, Tschinkel WR (1999) Ritualized conflict in Odontomachus brunneus and the generation of interaction-based task allocation: a new organizational mechanism in ants. Anim Behav 58:965–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ratnieks FLW, Reeve HK (1992) Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species. J Theor Biol 158:33–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T (2008) Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced? Trends Ecol Evol 23:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T (2006) Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 51:581–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robson SKA, Bean K, Hansen J, Norling K, Rowe RJ, White D (2000) Social and spatial organisation in colonies of a primitively eusocial wasp, Ropalidia revolutionalis (de Saussure) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Aust J Entomol 39:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1995) Spatial relationships within nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour. Anim Behav 50:121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sokal R, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Sramkova A, Schulz C, Twele R, Francke W, Ayasse M (2008) Fertility signals in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Naturwissenschaften 95:515–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tindo M, Dejean A (2000) Dominance hierarchy in colonies of Belonogaster juncea juncea (Vespidae, Polistinae). Insectes Sociaux 47:158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tofilski A (2002) Influence of age polyethism on longevity of workers in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:234–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsuji K, Tsuji N (2005) Why is dominance hierarchy age-related in social insects? The relative longevity hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. van Doorn A, Heringa J (1986) The ontogeny of a dominance hierarchy in colonies of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insectes Sociaux 33:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW (2006) Enforced altruism in insect societies. Nature 444:50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wenseleers T, Helanterä H, Hart A, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Worker reproduction and policing in insect societies: an ESS analysis. J Evol Biol 17:1035–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. West-Eberhard MJ (1969) The social biology of Polistine wasps. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 140:1–101Google Scholar
  57. West-Eberhard MJ (1981) Intragroup selection and the evolution of insect societies. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 3–17Google Scholar
  58. Woyciechowski M, Kozłowski J (1998) Division of labor by division of risk according to worker life expectancy in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 29:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yerushalmi S, Bodenhaimer S, Bloch G (2006) Developmentally determined attenuation in circadian rhythms links chronobiology to social organization in bees. J Exp Biol 209:1044–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology & Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations