Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 12, pp 2261–2268 | Cite as

Parentally biased favouritism in relation to offspring sex in zebra finches

Original Paper

Abstract

Family conflicts over parental care result in offspring attempting to exert control using solicitation behaviours, whilst the parents are potentially able to retaliate through provisioning rules. However, the evolutionary interests of one parent may not necessarily support the evolutionary interests of the other parent, and such conflicts of interest may be expressed in how the two parents allocate the same form of parental care to individual offspring. Theory suggests that such parentally biased favouritism is a universally predicted outcome of evolutionary conflicts of interest, and empirical evidence suggests that parentally biased favouritism occurs in relation to offspring size and solicitation behaviours. However, unequivocal empirical evidence of parentally biased favouritism in relation to offspring sex is absent, due to being strongly confounded by sex differences in size and solicitation behaviours. Here, we present strong evidence for parentally biased favouritism in relation to offspring sex in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), independent of the effects of chick size and begging intensity. Mothers preferentially provisioned sons over daughters, whilst fathers showed no bias, meaning that sons received more food than daughters. Parentally biased favouritism in relation to offspring sex facilitates parental control over evolutionary conflicts of interest and is probably more widespread than previously realised.

Keywords

Chick begging Hatching asynchrony Offspring sex Parental care Parentally biased favouritism Zebra finch 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Geoff Holroyd, Peter Flint and Phil Nott for bird husbandry; Murray Aitkin and Christopher Sherlock for statistical advice; Scott Forbes, Kate Lessells, Ian Owens, Ken Wilson, Richard Bardgett and Megan Dickens for other advice; and the Natural Environment Research Council for funding as a studentship to MCM (NER/S/A.2003/11263) and as a research grant to IRH (NE/E010806/1).

References

  1. Bell MBV (2007) Cooperative begging in banded mongoose pups. Curr Biol 17:717–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1996) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boncoraglio G, Saino N (2008) Barn swallow chicks beg more loudly when broodmates are unrelated. J Evol Biol 21:256–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boncoraglio G, Martinelli R, Saino N (2008a) Sex-related asymmetry in competitive ability of sexually monomorphic barn swallow nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:729–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boncoraglio G, Saino N, Garamszegi LZ (2008b) Begging and cowbirds: brood parasites make hosts scream louder. Behav Ecol 20:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browne WJ, McCleery RH, Sheldon BC, Pettifor RA (2007) Using cross-classified multivariate mixed response models with application to life history traits in great tit (Parus major). Stat Model 7:217–238Google Scholar
  7. Budden AE, Wright J (2001) Begging in nestling birds. In: Nolan V Jr, Thompson CF (eds) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 83–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Byle PAF (1990) Brood division and parental care in the period between fledging and independence in the dunnock (Prunella modularis). Behaviour 113:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1981) Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals. Nature 289:487–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickens M, Hartley IR (2007) Differences in parental food allocation rules: evidence for sexual conflict in the blue tit? Behav Ecol 18:674–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glassey B, Forbes LS (2002) Begging and asymmetric nestling competition. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp269–281Google Scholar
  14. Gowaty PA, Droge DL (1991) Sex ratio conflict and the evolution of sex biased provisioning. Proc 20th Int Ornithol Congr 2:932–945Google Scholar
  15. Kilner RM (2002a) Sex differences in canary (Serinus canaria) provisioning rules. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilner RM (2002b) The evolution of complex begging displays. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 87–106Google Scholar
  17. Kilner RM, Johnstone RA (1997) Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need? Trends Ecol Evol 12:11–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krebs EA, Cunningham RB, Donnelly CF (1999) Complex patterns of food allocation in asynchronously hatching broods of crimson rosellas. Anim Behav 57:753–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leonard M, Horn A (1996) Provisioning rules in tree swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonard ML, Teather KL, Horn AG, Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (1994) Provisioning in western bluebirds is not related to offspring sex. Behav Ecol 5:455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lessells CM (1998) A theoretical framework for sex-biased parental care. Anim Behav 56:395–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lessells CM (2002a) Parentally biased favouritism: why should parents specialize in caring for different offspring? Phil Trans R Soc B 357:381–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lessells CM (2002b) Parental investment in relation to offspring sex. In: Wright J, Meonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging: competition, cooperation and communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 65–85Google Scholar
  24. Magrath RD (1990) Hatching asynchrony in altricial birds. Biol Rev 65:587–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mainwaring MC, Hartley IR, Gilby AJ, Griffith SC (2010) Hatching asynchrony and growth trade-offs within domesticated and wild zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata, broods. Biol J Linn Soc 100:763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malacarne G, Cucco M, Bertolo E (1994) Sibling competition in asynchronously hatched broods of the pallid swift (Apus pallidus). Ethol Ecol Ecol 6:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michler SPM, Bleeker M, van der Velde M, Both C, Komdeur J, Tinbergen JM (2010) Parental provisioning in relation to offspring sex and sex ratio in the great tit (Parus major). Behaviour 147:1355–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mock DW, Parker GA (1997) The evolution of sibling rivalry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker GA, Royle NJ, Hartley IR (2002) Intra-familial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis. Phil Trans R Soc B 357:295–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Price TD, Gibbs HL (1987) Brood division in Darwin’s ground finches. Anim Behav 35:299–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid JM, Monaghan P, Nager RG (2002) Incubation and the costs of incubation. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 314–325Google Scholar
  33. Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Owens IPF, Parker GA (1999) Sibling competition and the evolution of growth rates in birds. Proc R Soc B 266:923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Royle NJ, Parker GA, Hartley IR (2002) Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest? Trends Ecol Evol 17:434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Royle NJ, Hartley IR, Parker GA (2006) Consequences of biparental care for begging and growth in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 72:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shiao MT, Chuang MC, Wang Y (2009) Differential food distribution by male and female green-backed tits (Parus monticolus) in relation to nestling size. Auk 126:906–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skagen SK (1988) Asynchronous hatching and food limitation: a test of Lack’s hypothesis. Auk 105:78–88Google Scholar
  38. Slagsvold T (1997) Is there a sexual conflict over hatching asynchrony in American robins? Auk 114:593–600Google Scholar
  39. Smiseth PT, Amundsen T, Hansen LTT (1998) Do males and females differ in the feeding of large and small siblings? An experiment with the bluethroat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stamps JA (1990) When should avian parents differentially provision sons and daughters. Am Nat 135:671–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stamps JA, Clark AB, Kus B, Arrowood P (1987) The effects of parent and offspring gender on food allocation in budgerigars. Behaviour 101:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stoleson SH, Beissinger SR (1995) Hatching asynchrony and the onset of incubation in birds, revisited: when is the critical period? In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology. Plenum, New York, pp 191–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanner M, Kolliker M, Richner H (2008) Differential food allocation by male and female great tit, Parus major, parents: are parents or offspring in control? Anim Behav 75:1563–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teather KL (1992) An experimental study of competition between male and female nestlings of the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trivers RL (1974) Parent–offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264Google Scholar
  46. Vega LB, Holloway GJ, Millett JE, Richardson DS (2007) Extreme gender-based post-fledging brood division in the toc-toc. Behav Ecol 18:730–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weatherhead PJ, McRae SB (1990) Brood care in American robins: implications for mixed reproductive strategies by females. Anim Behav 39:1179–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Westneat DF, Clark AB, Rambo C (1995) Within-brood patterns of paternity and paternal behaviour in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiebe KL, Slagsvold T (2009) Parental sex differences in food allocation to junior brood members as mediated by prey size. Ethology 115:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yasukawa K, McClure JL, Boley RA, Zanocco J (1990) Provisioning of nestlings by male and female red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus. Anim Behav 40:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zann RA (1996) The Zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark C. Mainwaring
    • 1
  • David Lucy
    • 2
  • Ian R. Hartley
    • 1
  1. 1.Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations