Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 9, pp 1715–1720 | Cite as

Cannibalism in the lifeboat — collective movement in Australian plague locusts

  • Matthew J. Hansen
  • Jerome Buhl
  • Sepideh Bazazi
  • Stephen J. Simpson
  • Gregory A. Sword
Original Paper


Mass migration of locusts is an economically devastating and poorly understood phenomenon. Locust mass migration often follows rapid population growth because individuals must move to find new sources of locally depleted resources. In Mormon crickets and Desert locusts, cannibalistic interactions have been revealed as the driving force behind collective mass movement. Locusts are known to compensate for nutrient deficiencies and they themselves are a good source of nutrients such as protein. However, direct empirical evidence for an adaptive benefit of cannibalism in migratory bands has been lacking. Here, we first show that Australian plague locusts, Chortoicetes terminifera, will cannibalise vulnerable conspecifics to compensate for protein deprivation, supporting the notion that cannibalistic interactions among nutritionally deprived individuals drives collective mass movement. We then show that individuals in a group with the opportunity to cannibalise survive longer and move more than individuals without the opportunity to cannibalise. These results provide empirical support for the ‘lifeboat mechanism’, which proposes that cannibalism offers the dual benefits to individuals in a group of surviving longer and travelling farther than a solitary individual without the opportunity to cannibalise.


Cannibalism Australian plague locust Chortoicetes terminifera Collective movement Nutrition Migration 



This project was partly funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project grant in conjunction with the Australian Plague Locust Commission. Thanks to the members of the School of Biological Sciences, the University of Sydney who assisted with the rearing of locusts.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and that the experiments comply with the current laws of Australia.


  1. Bazazi S, Buhl J, Hale JJ, Anstey ML, Sword GA, Simpson SJ, Couzin ID (2008) Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Curr Biol 18:735–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazazi S, Romanczuk P, Thomas S, Schimansky-Geier L, Hale JJ, Miller GA, Sword GA, Simpson SJ, Couzin ID (2011) Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration. Proc R Soc B 278:356–363. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1447 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernays EA (1977) Physiological control of drinking behaviour in nymphs of Locusta migratoria. Phys Entomol 2:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blayneh KW (1999) Cannibalism in a seasonal environment. Math Comp Mod 30:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhl J, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID, Hale JJ, Despland E, Miller ER, Simpson SJ (2006) From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312:1402–1406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buhl J, Sword GA, Clissold FJ, Simpson SJ (2010) Group structure in locust migratory bands. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1041-x Google Scholar
  7. Claessen D, de Roos AM, Persson L (2004) Population dynamic theory of size-dependent cannibalism. Proc R Soc B 271:333–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Couzin ID (2007) Collective minds. Nature 445:715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeFoliart GR, Finke MD, Sunde ML (1982) Potential value of the Mormon cricket (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) harvested as a high-protein feed for poultry. J Econ Entomol 75:848–852Google Scholar
  10. Elgar MA, Crespi DJ (1992) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford Scientific Publications, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  11. Lorch PD, Sword GA, Gwynne DT, Anderson GL (2005) Radiotelemetry reveals differences in individual movement patterns between outbreak and non-outbreak Mormon cricket populations. Ecol Entomol 30:548–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Romanczuk P, Couzin ID, Schimansky-Geier L (2009) Collective motion due to individual escape and pursuit response. Phys Rev Lett 102:010602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simpson SJ, Abisgold JD (1985) Compensation by locusts for changes in dietary nutrients: behavioural mechanisms. Physiol Entomol 10:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simpson SJ, Sword GA, Lorch PD, Couzin ID (2006) Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. PNAS 103:4152–4156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sword GA, Lorch PD, Gwynne GT (2005) Migratory bands give crickets protection. Nature 433:703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sword GA, Lecoq M, Simpson SJ (2010) Phase polyphenism and preventative locust management. J Insect Physiol 56:949–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Hansen
    • 1
  • Jerome Buhl
    • 1
  • Sepideh Bazazi
    • 2
  • Stephen J. Simpson
    • 1
  • Gregory A. Sword
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations