Darwin’s “tug-of-war” vs. starlings’ “horse-racing”: how adaptations for sequential encounters drive simultaneous choice
- 528 Downloads
Charles Darwin aided his private decision making by an explicit deliberation, famously deciding whether or not to marry by creating a list of points in a table with two columns: “Marry” and “Not Marry”. One hundred seventy-two years after Darwin’s wedding, we reconsider whether this process of choice, under which individuals assign values to their options and compare their relative merits at the time of choosing (the tug-of-war model), applies to our experimental animal, the European Starling, Sturnus vulgaris. We contrast this with the sequential choice model that postulates that decision-makers make no comparison between options at the time of choice. According to the latter, behaviour in simultaneous choices reflects adaptations to contexts with sequential encounters, in which the choice is whether to take an opportunity or let it pass. We postulate that, in sequential encounters, the decision-maker assigns (by learning) a subjective value to each option, reflecting its payoff relative to background opportunities. This value is expressed as latency and/or probability to accept each opportunity as opposed to keep searching. In simultaneous encounters, choice occurs through each option being processed independently, by a race between the mechanisms that generate option-specific latencies. We describe these alternative models and review data supporting the predictions of the sequential choice model.
KeywordsChoice Latency Sequential choice model Tug-of-war model Sturnus vulgaris
This work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant BB/G007144/1 to AK. MV, TM, and JA were supported by an Intra-European Marie Curie Fellowship, a doctoral grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, and a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Fellowship, respectively. We are grateful to Miguel Rodriguez-Gironés for discussions and advice.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aw J (2008) Decisions under uncertainty: common processes in birds, fish and humans. University of Oxford, DissertationGoogle Scholar
- Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138Google Scholar
- Charnov EL (1976a) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:145–156Google Scholar
- Darwin CR (1838) ‘This is the question Marry Not Marry’ [Memorandum on marriage]. CUL-DAR210.8.2 (Darwin Online, http://darwin-online.org.uk/)
- Franklin B (1772) Letter to Joseph Priestley. Printed 1987 in Writings, pp. 877–878. New York: The Library of America.Google Scholar
- Gibson RM (1990) Relationship between blood parasites, mating success and phenotypic cues in male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. Am Zool 30:271–278Google Scholar
- Houston A (2010) Central-place foraging by humans: transport and processing. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1119-5
- Kacelnik A (2003) The evolution of patience. In: Loewenstein G, Read D, Baumeister R (eds) Time and decision: economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice. New York, Russell Sage, pp 115–138Google Scholar
- Marshall J, McNamara J, Houston A (2010) The state of Darwinian theory. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1121-y
- Parker GA (1983) Mate quality and mating decisions. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–166Google Scholar
- Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara frog, a study in sexual selection and communication. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz L (2004) The paradox of choice: why more is less. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–447Google Scholar
- Zupko J (2006) J Buridan. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buridan/. Accessed 18 February 2010.