Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 613–619

Adjustment of brood care behaviour in the absence of a mate in two species of Nicaraguan crater lake cichlids

  • Topi K. Lehtonen
  • Bob B. M. Wong
  • P. Andreas Svensson
  • Axel Meyer
Original Paper


In many taxa, parental strategies can vary among individuals. This is especially true in species with biparental care, with males, more often than females, deserting their mates. While there is an abundance of theoretical predictions and empirical data on factors inducing mate abandonment by males, much less is known about what consequences this may have on female behaviour, particularly in the field and in non-avian systems. Here, we compared brood defence rate, behavioural defence types, and brood success of solitary and paired females in two species of Neotropical cichlid fish in their natural habitat. In terms of the rate of territorial aggression towards potential brood predators, solitary females were able to fully compensate in the absence of a male but, in so doing, ended up maintaining smaller territories, which appeared to compromise offspring fitness in at least one of the two species. Hence, our results suggest that even extensive quantitative compensation in parental effort by solitary females may not be enough to ensure adequate qualitative compensation for the lack of male participation, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between these two aspects of compensatory parental care.


Mate desertion Midas cichlid species complex Offspring survival Parental care Qualitative care compensation Territorial aggression 


  1. Barlow GW (1976) The Midas cichlid in Nicaragua. In: Thorson TB (ed) Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes. University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska, pp 333–358Google Scholar
  2. Barlow GW (2000) Cichlid fishes: nature’s grand experiment in evolution. Perseus Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow GW, Munsey JW (1976) The red devil-Midas-arrow cichlid species complex in Nicaragua. In: Thorson TB (ed) Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes. University of Nebraska Press, Nebraska, pp 359–369Google Scholar
  4. Barluenga M, Stölting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A (2006) Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature 439:719–723. doi:10.1038/nature04325 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessinger SR, Snyder NFR (1987) Mate desertion in the snail kite. Anim Behav 35:477–487. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80273-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60. doi:10.1038/351058a0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elmer KR, Lehtonen TK, Meyer A (2009) Color assortative mating contributes to sympatric divergence of neotropical cichlid fish. Evolution 63:2750–2757. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00736.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elmer KR, Kusche H, Lehtonen TK, Meyer A (2010) Local variation and parallel evolution: morphological and genetic diversity across a species complex of Neotropical crater lake cichlid fishes. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:1763–1782. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griggio M, Pilastro A (2007) Sexual conflict over parental care in a species with female and male brood desertion. Anim Behav 74:779–785. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross MR (2005) The evolution of parental care. Q Rev Biol 80:37–45. doi:10.1086/431023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harrison F, Barta Z, Cuthill I, Székely T (2009) How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta-analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1800–1812. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01792.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.10.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jennions MD, Polakow DA (2001) The effect of partial brood loss on male desertion in a cichlid fish: an experimental test. Behav Ecol 12:84–92Google Scholar
  15. Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lazarus J (1990) The logic of mate desertion. Anim Behav 39:672–684. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80378-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lazarus J, Inglis IR (1986) Shared and unshared parental investment, parent-offspring conflict and brood size. Anim Behav 34:1791–1804. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80265-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehtonen TK, McCrary JK, Meyer A (2010a) Territorial aggression can be sensitive to the status of heterospecific intruders. Behav Process 84:598–601. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehtonen TK, Wong BBM, Lindström K, Meyer A (2010b) Species divergence and seasonal succession in rates of mate desertion in closely related Neotropical cichlid fishes. Behav Ecol Socibiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1061-6
  20. Marques PAM (2004) Parental care, male desertion, and reproductive success in the Spanish sparrow, Passer hispaniolensis. Zool Stud 43:123–131Google Scholar
  21. McKaye KR (1977) Competition for breeding sites between the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloa, Nicaragua. Ecology 58:291–302. doi:10.2307/1935604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKaye KR (1986) Mate choice and size assortative pairing by the cichlid fishes of Lake Jiloá, Nicaragua. J Fish Biol 29(Supplement A):135–150. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb05005.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKaye KR, Murry BA (2008) Sex role differentiation in brood defense by a Nicaraguan cichlid fish, Amphilophus xiloanensis. Caribb J Sci 44:13–20Google Scholar
  24. McNamara JM, Gasson CE, Houston AI (1999) Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature 401:368–371. doi:10.1038/43869 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McNamara JM, Houston AI, Székely T, Webb JN (2002) Do parents make independent decisions about desertion? Anim Behav 64:147–149. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noakes DLG, Barlow GW (1973) Ontogeny of parent-contacting in young Cichlasoma citrinellum (Pisces, Cichlidae). Behaviour 46:221–255. doi:10.1163/156853973X00021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Queller DC (1997) Why do females care more than males? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1555–1557. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2004) Time constraints and trade-offs among parental care behaviours: effects of brood size, sex and loss of mate. Anim Behav 68:695–702. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reynolds JD (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol Evol 11:68–72. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)81045-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers W (1987) Sex ratio, monogamy and breeding success in the Midas cichlid (Cichlasoma citrinellum). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:47–51. doi:10.1007/BF00324434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogers W (1988) Parental investment and division of labor in the Midas cichlid (Cichlasoma citrinellum). Ethology 79:126–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smiseth PT, Dawson C, Varley E, Moore AJ (2005) How do caring parents respond to mate loss? Differential response by males and females. Anim Behav 69:551–559. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith C, Wootton RJ (1995) The costs of parental care in teleost fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 5:7–22. doi:10.1007/BF01103363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stauffer JR Jr, McKaye KR (2002) Descriptions of three new species of cichlid fishes (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Lake Xiloá, Nicaragua. Cuadernos de la Investigación de la UCA 12:1–18Google Scholar
  35. Suzuki S, Nagano M (2009) To compensate or not? Caring parents respond differentially to mate removal and mate handicapping in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus quadripunctatus. Ethology 115:1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01598.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vélez MJ, Jennions MD, Telford SR (2002) The effect of an experimental brood reduction on male desertion in the Panamanian blue acara cichlid Aequidens coeruleopunctatus. Ethology 108:331–340. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00772.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wisenden BD (1994) Factors affecting mate desertion by males in free-ranging convict cichlids (Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum). Behav Ecol 5:439–447. doi:10.1093/beheco/5.4.439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wisenden BD (1995) Reproductive behaviour of free-ranging convict cichlids, Cichlasoma nigrofasciatum. Environ Biol Fish 43:121–134. doi:10.1007/BF00002480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wisenden BD (1999) Alloparental care in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 9:45–70. doi:10.1023/A:1008865801329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Topi K. Lehtonen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bob B. M. Wong
    • 2
  • P. Andreas Svensson
    • 2
  • Axel Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of BiologyUniversity of KonstanzConstanceGermany
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityVictoriaAustralia
  3. 3.Section of Ecology, Department of Biology20014 University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations