Dynamic adjustment of biosonar intensity to habitat clutter in the bat Macrophyllum macrophyllum (Phyllostomidae)
- 361 Downloads
Echolocating bats adjust the time–frequency structure such as sweep rate and pulse interval of their sonar calls when they move from open space to vegetation-dense environments. Emitted call intensity is equally important for echolocation, but adjustment of signal intensity to different habitats has never been systematically studied in any bat species. To address this question, we recorded sonar calls of the Neotropical trawling insectivorous bat Macrophyllum macrophyllum (Phyllostomidae) at three sites with different obstacle densities (clutter). We found a clear correlation between emitted intensity and degree of clutter, with intensity proportional to decreasing clutter. In highly cluttered, semicluttered, and open spaces, M. macrophyllum emitted calls with mean source levels (sound pressure level (SPL) 10 cm from the bat’s mouth) of 100, 105, and 111 dB SPL root mean square (rms), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first documentation of dynamic intensity adjustments in bats. Phyllostomid bats were previously considered silent, but the 111-dB SPL rms emitted by free-ranging M. macrophyllum in open space is comparable to output in aerial insectivorous bats from other families. Our results suggest that the acoustic constraints of habitats are better predictors of call intensity than phylogeny and therefore likely to be major drivers shaping the sonar system of bats in the course of evolution.
KeywordsSource level Biosonar intensity Phyllostomidae Bat Echolocation
Sound pressure level
Research was funded by the Danish Natural Science Research foundation (to A. S. and S. B.), the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin (fellowship support of A.S.), and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) and the German Science Foundation (DFG; to E.K.V.K.). We thank Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard and John Ratcliffe for comments on previous manuscript versions and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. We also thank Christian Brandt for positioning software, Ulrik Nørum for help with statistic analysis, and STRI and Isla Barro Colorado staff for excellent research facilities. Research complied with laws of Panamá and IACUC regulations of STRI.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- ANSI (1978) American National Standard. Method for the calibration of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere. ANSI S1 26-1978. Standards Secretariat. Acoustical Society of America. 335 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017, USA. American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
- Miller LA, Treat AE (1993) Field recordings of echolocation and social signals from the gleaning bat Myotis septentrionalis. Bioacoustics 5:67–87Google Scholar
- Novick A (1977) Acoustic orientation. In: Wimsatt WA (ed) Biology of bats, vol 3. Academic, New York, pp 74–289Google Scholar
- Weinbeer M, Meyer CFJ, Kalko EKV (2006) Activity pattern of the trawling phyllostomid bat, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, in Panamá. Biotropica 38(1):69–76Google Scholar
- Wilson WW, Moss CF (2004) Sensory-motor behavior of free-flying FM bats during target capture. In: Thomas JA, Moss CF, Vater M (eds) Echolocation in bats and dolphins. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 22–27Google Scholar