Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 64, Issue 10, pp 1673–1683

Vocal masculinity is a robust dominance signal in men

Original Paper

Abstract

Dominance assessment is important in mating competition across a variety of species, but little is known about how individuals’ own quality affects their assessment of potential rivals. We conducted two studies to test whether men’s own dominance affects their attentiveness to a putative dominance signal, vocal masculinity, when assessing competitors. Study I examined dominance ratings made by men in relation to their self-rated physical dominance. Study II examined dominance ratings made by men in relation to objective measures of their physical dominance, including size, strength, testosterone, and physical aggressiveness. Vocal masculinity strongly affected dominance ratings, but a man’s own dominance did not alter his attention to vocal masculinity when assessing dominance. However, men who rated themselves high on physical dominance rated the voices of other men lower on dominance and reported more sex partners (study I). Men with intermediate testosterone concentrations rated the voices of other men lower on dominance (study II). These results confirm the effect of vocal masculinity on dominance perceptions, provide further evidence that dominance is relevant to mating success, and shed new light on how men assess the dominance of rivals and potential allies. Our results suggest that attention to dominance signals may depend less on the observer’s own dominance in species with coalitional aggression, where individuals must assess others not only in relation to themselves but also in relation to each other. Among men, the effect of a deep, masculine voice on perceptions of dominance appears to be robust and unmediated by the formidability of the listener.

Keywords

Dominance Formant frequency Fundamental frequency Mating success Sexual selection Voice pitch 

References

  1. Adkins-Regan E (2005) Hormones and animal social behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer J (1988) The behavioral biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer J (1991) The influence of testosterone on human-aggression. Br J Psychol 82:1–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer J, Thanzami V (2007) The relation between physical aggression, size and strength, among a sample of young Indian men. Pers Individ Differ 43:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer J, Thanzami V (2009) The relation between mate value, entitlement, physical aggression, size and strength among a sample of young Indian men. Evol Hum Behav 30:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassey EJ, Harries UJ (1993) Normal values for handgrip strength in 920 men and women aged over 65 years, and longitudinal changes over 4 years in 620 survivors. Clin Sci 84:331–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baxendale PM, Reed MJ, James VHT (1980) Testosterone in saliva of normal men and its relationship with unbound and total testosterone levels in plasma. J Endocrinol 187:46–47Google Scholar
  9. Boersma P, Weenik D (2009) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.03)Google Scholar
  10. Booth A, Johnson DR, Granger DA (1999) Testosterone and men's depression: the role of social behavior. J Health Soc Behav 40:130–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Burriss RP, Little AC (2006) Effects of partner conception risk phase on male perception of dominance in faces. Evol Hum Behav 27:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buss AH, Perry M (1992) The aggression questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 63:452–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carre JM (2009) No place like home: testosterone responses to victory depend on game location. Am J Hum Biol 21:392–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carre JM, Putnam SK, McCormick CM (2009) Testosterone responses to competition predict future aggressive behaviour at a cost to reward in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34:561–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chagnon NA (1988) Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark AS, Henderson LP (2003) Behavioral and physiological responses to anabolic-androgenic steroids. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:413–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, Boothroyd LG, Perrett DI, Penton-Voak IS, Cooper PA, Penke L, Feinberg DR, Tiddeman BP (2006) Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 273:1355–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fairbanks G (1960) Voice and articulation drillbook, 2nd edn. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Faurie C, Pontier D, Raymond M (2004) Student athletes claim to have more sexual partners than other students. Evol Hum Behav 25:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2005) Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies affect the attractiveness of human male voices. Anim Behav 69:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Law Smith MJ, Moore FR, DeBruine LM, Cornwell RE, Hillier SG, Perrett DI (2006) Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Horm Behav 49:215–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Felson RB (1996) Big people hit little people: sex differences in physical power and interpersonal violence. Criminology 34:433–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fitch WT (1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1213–1222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fitch WT, Giedd J (1999) Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 106:1511–1522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Frost P (1994) Preference for darker faces in photographs at different plases of the menstrual cycle—preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship. Percept Mot Skills 79:507–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallup AC, White DD, Gallup GG (2007) Handgrip strength predicts sexual behavior, body morphology, and aggression in male college students. Evol Hum Behav 28:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (2008) Human oestrus. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 275:991–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA, Cousins AJ, Garver-Apgar CE, Christensen PN (2004) Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychol Sci 15:203–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gonzalez J (2004) Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans. J Voice 32:277–287Google Scholar
  31. Grammer K (1993) 5-alpha-androst-16en-3-alpha-on a male pheromone—a brief report. Ethol Sociobiol 14:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris JA (1999) Review and methodological considerations in research on testosterone and aggression. Aggress Violent Behav 4:272–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howard DM, Murphy DT (2008) Voice science acoustics and recording. Plural Publishing, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnston VS, Hagel R, Franklin M, Fink B, Grammer K (2001) Male facial attractiveness—evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol Hum Behav 22:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Vukovic J (2010) A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Anim Behav 79:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keverne EB, Leonard RA, Scruton DM, Young SK (1978) Visual monitoring in social groups of talapoin monkeys (Miopithecus talapoin). Anim Behav 26:933–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lassek WD, Gaulin SJC (2009) Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and natural immunity. Evol Hum Behav 30:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee S, Potamianos A, Narayanan S (1999) Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. J Acoust Soc Am 105:1455–1468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2002) Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:1095–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Little AC, Jones BC, Burriss RP (2007a) Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Horm Behav 51:633–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2007b) Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 76:209–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazur A, Booth A (1998) Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav Brain Sci 21:353–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moffat SD, Hampson E (1996) Salivary testosterone levels in left- and right-handed adults. Neuropsychologia 34:225–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Morton ES (1977) Occurrence and significance of motivation structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mueller U, Mazur A (2001) Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ohala JJ (1983) Cross-language use of pitch: an ethological view. Phonetica 40:1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ohala JJ (1984) An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI (2000) Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evol Hum Behav 21:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, Minamisawa R (1999) Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 399:741–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Perusse D (1993) Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: testing the relationship at proximate and ultimate levels. Behav Brain Sci 16:239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Provost MP, Kormos C, Kosakoski G, Quinsey VL (2006) Sociosexuality in women and preference for facial masculinization and somatotype in men. Arch Sex Behav 35:305–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Puts DA (2005) Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch. Evol Hum Behav 26:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Puts DA (2006) Cyclic variation in women's preferences for masculine traits: potential hormonal causes. Hum Nat 17:114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Puts DA (2010) Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evol Hum Behav 31:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Puts DA, Gaulin SJC, Verdolini K (2006) Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evol Hum Behav 27:283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Puts DA, Hodges C, Cardenas RA, Gaulin SJC (2007) Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evol Hum Behav 28:340–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramirez JM (2003) Hormones and aggression in childhood and adolescence. Aggress Violent Behav 8:621–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rantanen T, Masaki K, Foley D, Izmirlian G, White L, Guralnik JM (1998) Grip strength changes over 27 yr in Japanese-American men. J Appl Physiol 85:2047–2053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Rendall D, Kollias S, Ney C, Lloyd P (2005) Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. J Acoust Soc Am 117:944–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Roberts SC, Little AC, Lyndon A, Roberts J, Havlicek J, Wright RL (2009) Manipulation of body odour alters men's self-confidence and judgements of their visual attractiveness by women. Int J Cosmet Sci 31:47–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sell A, Cosmides L, Tooby J, Sznycer D, von Rueden C, Gurven M (2009) Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 276:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW, Christensen PN, Leck K (1999) Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:159–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Symons D (1995) Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In: Abramson PR, Pinkerton SD (eds) Sexual nature sexual culture. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  64. Tibbetts EA, Mettler A, Levy S (2009) Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps. Biol Lett 6:10–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Titze IR (2000) Principles of voice production. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  66. Tremblay RE, Schaal B, Boulerice B, Arseneault L, Soussignan RG, Paquette D, Laurent D (1998) Testosterone, physical aggression, dominance, and physical development in early adolescence. Int J Behav Dev 22:753–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tusing KJ, Dillard JP (2000) The sounds of dominance: vocal precursors of perceived dominance during interpersonal influence. Hum Commun Res 26:148–171Google Scholar
  68. Wang C, Plymate S, Nieschlag E, Paulsen CA (1981) Salivary testosterone in men: further evidence of a direct correlation with free serum testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:1021–1024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson WJ (1975) Social hierarchy and dominance—Schein, MW. J Biol Psychol 17:36–37Google Scholar
  70. Xue SA, Hao GJ (2003) Changes in the human vocal tract due to aging and the acoustic correlates of speech production: a pilot study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 46:689–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations