Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 64, Issue 10, pp 1589–1600 | Cite as

Correlates of male mating success in great bustard leks: the effects of age, weight, and display effort

  • Juan C. Alonso
  • Marina Magaña
  • Carlos Palacín
  • Carlos A. Martín
Original Paper

Abstract

We examined how mating success varied in relation to age, weight, body size, and display behavior among great bustard Otis tarda males. The estimated mating success was strongly skewed, with 45% of adult males being involved in copulation attempts and only 9.7% actually seen copulating successfully. Unlike most birds, body size continued increasing in great bustards several years after reaching sexual maturity. Age, weight, and display effort were all significant and independent predictors of male mating success. The higher display effort involved performing longer full-display bouts. Older males could detach from the male flock earlier in the season as well as on each day and spend longer seasonal and daily periods displaying as solitary birds, which contributed to increase their mating success. In contrast, males weighing more did not invest more in display, which suggests that they could be recognized as dominants by other males and selected by females through assessment of their plumage sexual traits. In contrast to most other bird species, the system described for great bustards resembles that found in some lek-mating ungulates, where social rank is a complex trait determined by both age and mass, and as in these mammals, it suggests that sexual selection continues to favor a high male weight in this extremely sexually dimorphic species.

Keywords

Age Great bustard Lek Mating success Sexual selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank J.A. Alonso for his collaboration during bird captures and aerial location of marked birds. S.J. Lane, E. Martín, and M. Morales provided additional help during captures and J.C. Orellana and B. Martín during tracking. We are especially grateful to the 42 Group of the Spanish Air Forces for their generous collaboration in locating radio-tagged birds. Jacqueline K. Augustine and an anonymous reviewer gave helpful comments on a previous draft of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry for Science and Technology (projects PB97-1252 and BOS2002-01543). M.M. benefited from a predoctoral fellowship of the CSIC-MNCN-CAM (1998-2002).

Ethical standards

The procedures followed in this study comply with the current Spanish laws.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali S, Rahmani AR (1984) Study of ecology of certain endangered species of wildlife and their habitats. The great Indian bustard. Annual Report 2. Bombay Natural History Society, BombayGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso JC, Martín E, Alonso JA, Morales MB (1998) Proximate and ultimate causes of natal dispersal in the great bustard Otis tarda. Behav Ecol 9:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso JC, Martín CA, Palacín C, Magaña M, Martín B (2003) Distribution, size and recent trends of the great bustard Otis tarda population in Madrid province, Spain. Ardeola 50:21–29Google Scholar
  4. Alonso JC, Magaña M, Martín CA, Palacín C, Alonso JA (2006) Field determination of age in male great bustards (Otis tarda) in spring. Eur J Wildl Res 52:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alonso JC, Magaña M, Alonso JA, Palacín C, Martín CA, Martín B (2009) The most extreme sexual size dimorphism among birds: allometry, selection, and early juvenile development in the great bustard. Auk 126:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Balmford A, Albon S, Blakeman S (1992) Correlates of male mating success and female choice in a lek-breeding antelope. Behav Ecol 3:112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beani L, Dessì-Fulgheri F (1995) Mate choice in the grey partridge, Perdix perdix: role of physical and behavioural male traits. Anim Behav 49:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck C, Powell L (2000) Evolution of female choice based on male age: are older males better mates? Evol Ecol Res 2:107–118Google Scholar
  10. Beck CW, Promislow DEL (2007) Evolution of female preference for younger males. PLoS ONE 2:e939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000939 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Birkhead TR, Atkin L, Moller AP (1987) Copulation behaviour of birds. Behaviour 101:101–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowyer RT, Bleich VC, Manteca X, Whiting JC, Stewart KM (2007) Sociality, mate choice, and timing of mating in American Bison (Bison bison): effects of large males. Ethology 113:1048–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138Google Scholar
  14. Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? TREE 16:308–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carranza J, Hidalgo SJ (1993) Condition-dependence and sex traits in the male great bustard. Ethology 94:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clinchy M, Taylor AC, Zanette LY, Krebs CJ, Jarman PJ (2004) Body size, age and paternity in common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Mol Ecol 13:195–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinnes FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer. Behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Clutton-Brock TH, Green D, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Albon SD (1988) Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in the fallow deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coltman DW, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Strobeck C (2002) Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Durães R, Loiselle BA, Blake JG (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics at manakin leks: reconciling lek traditionality with male turnover. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1947–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) (2007) Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher DO, Lara MC (1999) Effects of body size and home range on access to mates and paternity in male bridled nailtail wallabies. Anim Behav 58:121–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiske P, Rintamäki PT, Karvonen E (1998) Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 9:328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friedl TWP, Klump GM (2005) Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav 70:1141–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gewalt W (1959) Die Grosstrappe. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-LutherstadtGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibson RM, Bradbury JW (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of male mating success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glutz UN, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1973) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol. 5. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt a.MGoogle Scholar
  30. Gochfeld M (1987) On paradigm versus methods in the study of growth. Auk 104:554–555Google Scholar
  31. Halliday TR (1978) Sexual selection and mate choice. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 180–213Google Scholar
  32. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32Google Scholar
  33. Hansen TF, Price DK (1995) Good genes and old age: do old mates provide superior genes? J Evol Biol 8:759–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hass CC, Jenni DA (1991) Structure and ontogeny of dominance relationships among bighorn rams. Can J Zool 69:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hellmich J (1991) La avutarda en Extremadura. Monografías de Alytes. Adenex, MéridaGoogle Scholar
  36. Hidalgo SJ, Carranza J (1990) Ecología y comportamiento de la Avutarda (Otis tarda L.). Universidad de Extremadura, CáceresGoogle Scholar
  37. Hidalgo SJ, Carranza J (1991) Timing, structure and functions of the courtship display in male great bustard. Ornis Scand 22:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Höglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  39. Höglund J, Lundberg A (1987) Sexual selection in a monomorphic lek-breeding bird: correlates of male mating success in the great snipe Gallinago media. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Höglund J, Johansson T, Pelabon C (1997) Behaviourally mediated sexual selection: characteristics of successful male black grouse. Anim Behav 54:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnsgard PA (1994) Arena birds: sexual selection and behaviour. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Kenward RE (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Kirkpatrick M (1987) Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18:43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kokko H (1997) Evolutionary stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kokko H (1998) Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evol Ecol 12:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kokko H, Lindstrom J (1996) Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1533–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kokko H, Lindström J (1997) Measuring the mating skew. Am Nat 149:794–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magaña M (2007) Comportamiento reproductivo de la Avutarda Común. PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense, MadridGoogle Scholar
  49. McDonald M (1989) Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird with male–male cooperation. Anim Behav 37:1007–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, Hayden TJ (2001) Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Manning JT (1985) Choosy females and correlates of male age. J Theor Biol 116:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Manning JT (1989) Age-advertisement and the evolution of the peacock's train. J Evol Biol 2:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin P, Bateson P (1993) Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  54. Martínez C (2000) Daily activity patterns of great bustards Otis tarda. Ardeola 47:57–68Google Scholar
  55. Morales MB (2000) Ecología reproductiva y movimientos estacionales en la avutarda (Otis tarda). PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense, MadridGoogle Scholar
  56. Morales MB, Alonso JC, Martín C, Martín E, Alonso JA (2003) Male sexual display and attractiveness in the great bustard Otis tarda: the role of body condition. J Ethol 21:51–56Google Scholar
  57. Natoli E, Schmid M, Say L, Pontier D (2007) Male reproductive success in a social group of urban feral cats (Felis catus L.). Ethology 113:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nonacs P (2000) Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am Nat 156:577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nonacs P (2003) Skew calculator 2003. http://www.eeb.ucla.edu/Faculty/Nonacs/ SKEW%20CALCULATOR%202003.htm
  60. Nooker JK, Sandercock BK (2008) Phenotypic correlates and survival consequences of male mating success in lek-mating greater prairie-chickens (Tympanuchus cupido). Beh Ecol Sociobiol 62:1377–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parker TH, Ligon JD (2003) Female mating preferences in red junglefowl: a meta-analysis. Ethol Ecol Evol 15:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pelletier F, Festa-Bianchet M (2006) Sexual selection and social rank in bighorn rams. Anim Behav 71:649–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Proulx SR, Day T, Rowe L (2002) Older males signal more reliably. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2291–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ricklefs RE (1968) Patterns of growth in birds. Ibis 110:419–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rintamäki PT, Lundberg A, Alatalo RV, Höglund J (1998) Assortative mating and female clutch investment in black grouse. Anim Behav 56:1399–1403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rintamäki PT, Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A (2001) Correlates of male mating success on black grouse (Tetrao tetrix L.) leks. Ann Zool Fenn 38:99–109Google Scholar
  67. Shorey L (2002) Mating success on white-bearded manakin (Manacus manacus) leks: male characteristics and relatedness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Stamps JA (1993) Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth after maturity. Biol J Linn Soc 50:123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Statsoft Inc (2001) STATISTICA version 6. Tulsa, USAGoogle Scholar
  71. Teather KL, Weatherhead PJ (1994) Allometry, adaptation, and the growth and development of sexually dimorphic birds. Oikos 71:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Trivers R (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Press, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar
  73. Westneat DF (2006) No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. Am Nat 167:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wiley RH (1991) Lekking in birds and mammals: behavioral and evolutionary issues. Adv Stud Behav 20:201–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zedrosser A, Bellemain E, Taberlet P, Swenson JE (2007) Genetic estimates of annual reproductive success in male brown bears: the effects of body size, age, internal relatedness and population density. J Anim Ecol 76:368–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan C. Alonso
    • 1
  • Marina Magaña
    • 1
  • Carlos Palacín
    • 1
  • Carlos A. Martín
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología EvolutivaMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSICMadridSpain
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM)Ciudad RealSpain

Personalised recommendations