Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 64, Issue 10, pp 1577–1587

Collective foraging decision in a gregarious insect

  • Mathieu Lihoreau
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
  • Colette Rivault
Original Paper


Group foraging by eusocial insects implies sophisticated recruitment processes that often result in collective decisions to exploit the most profitable sources. These advanced levels of cooperation, however, remain limited to a small range of species, and we still know little about the mechanisms underlying group foraging behaviours in the great mass of animals exhibiting lower levels of social complexity. In this paper, we report, for the first time in a gregarious insect, the cockroach Blattella germanica (L.), a collective foraging decision whereby the selection of food sources is reached without requiring active recruitment. Groups of cockroaches given a binary choice between identical food sources exhibited exploitation asymmetries whose amplitude increases with group size. By coupling behavioural observations to computer simulations, we demonstrate that selection of food sources relies uniquely on a retention effect of feeding individuals on newcomers without comparison between available opportunities. This self-organised pattern presents similarities with the foraging dynamics of eusocial species, thus stressing the generic dimension of collective decision-making mechanisms based on social amplification rules despite fundamental differences in recruitment processes. We hypothesise that such parsimony could apply to a wide range of species and help understand the emergence of collective behaviours in simple social systems.


Collective decision making Foraging behaviour Gregarious cockroaches Retention effect 

Supplementary material

265_2010_971_MOESM1_ESM.doc (164 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 164 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Lihoreau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-Louis Deneubourg
    • 3
  • Colette Rivault
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Centre for Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical SciencesQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Unité Mixte de Recherche 6552, Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Rennes 1RennesFrance
  3. 3.Service d’Ecologie SocialeUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations