Female response to song reflects male developmental history in swamp sparrows
One explanation for why female songbirds attend to male song is that the quality of a male's song is associated with the quality of his developmental history. We tested this hypothesis by playing back to female swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) songs recorded from males of either inferior or superior developmental histories, as assessed by their rates of mass gain during the first 18 days post-hatching. Females showed significantly higher levels of courtship display in response to songs of males with superior growth than to songs of males with inferior growth. Out of nine song traits measured, only song duration correlated with variation in female response; duration was also the only trait that differed significantly in univariate comparisons between the superior growth songs and the inferior growth songs. In a multivariate analysis, however, inferior growth songs were best discriminated from superior growth songs by combining three song traits: trill rate, stereotypy, and the number of notes per syllable. We suggest that early developmental stress degrades song in many small ways, and that it is the cumulative effect of the resulting deficits that explains lower female response.
KeywordsBird song Developmental stress Song development Sexual selection Animal communication
We thank Melissa Hughes, Barb Ballentine, and Rindy Anderson for help with fieldwork, Monica Carlson and Laurel Cooper for help with hand-rearing, the Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology for logistical support, and the Pennsylvania Game Commission for access to field sites. Financial support was provided by grants from the National Science Foundation to WAS (IBN-0315566) and to SN (IBN-0315377) and by a Feodor Lynen Research Grant from the Humboldt Foundation (Germany) to SK. The study complies with all current laws of the USA. The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
- Immelmann K (1969) Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. In: Hinde RA (ed) Bird vocalizations: their relation to current problems in biology and psychology. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 61–74Google Scholar
- Klecka WR (1975) Discriminant analysis. In: Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinbrenner K, Bent D (eds) SPSS: statistical package for the social sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 434–467Google Scholar
- Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J (1998) Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool 38:179–190Google Scholar
- Searcy WA (1992) Measuring responses of female birds to male song. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 175–189Google Scholar
- Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2009) Consequences of brain development for sexual signaling in songbirds. In: Dukas R, Ratcliffe JM (eds) Cognitive Ecology II. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 71–87Google Scholar
- Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1996) Song and female choice. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 454–473Google Scholar
- Zann R (1993) Structure, sequence and evolution of song elements in wild Australian zebra finches. Auk 110:702–715Google Scholar