Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 64, Issue 8, pp 1291–1298

Active protection of unrelated offspring against parasitoids. A byproduct of self defense?

Original Paper

Abstract

Natural enemies exert selection pressure on their prey. Predators and parasitoids drive their prey into the evolution of novel traits to cope with this stress. When eggs and juveniles are the target of enemies, defense strategies may rely on adults. However, it is not easy to predict whether adults should actively protect unrelated offspring. Females of the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata) mainly oviposit on conspecifics of either sex. Females can also lay eggs on their food plant. Eggs placed on plants suffer from a higher mortality caused by natural enemies than eggs carried by bugs. Females never carry their own eggs and males are seldom related to the eggs they carry. We experimentally explored if conspecifics protect the eggs by studying the behavioral interaction between P. laciniata individuals and the specialist egg parasitoid Gryon bolivari. All bugs exhibited active responses against parasitoids regardless of the sex of the bug, the egg load, and their mating status. Most of the responses prevented parasitoids from reaching the eggs, and thus they reduced the risk of egg parasitization. Although responses of bugs were effective to overcome parasitoid attacks, we suggest that egg protection against parasitoids has evolved as a co-opted trait from a general defense of adult bugs against enemies. In this system, egg defense is not an individual's strategy to protect the offspring, but rather a consequence of the eggs being attached to one's body. It may also explain the low parasitization carried eggs suffer in the wild. The results further highlight the idea of conspecifics as an enemy-free space in P. laciniata.

Keywords

Egg guarding Egg protection Enemy-free space Heteroptera Coreidae Hymenoptera Scelionidae 

References

  1. Blum MS, Hilker M (2002) Chemical protection of insect eggs. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 61–90Google Scholar
  2. Broström G (2008) glmmML: Generalized linear models with clustering. R package version 0.81-3. http://cran.r-project.org/
  3. Carrasco D, Kaitala A (2009) Egg-laying tactic in Phyllomorpha laciniata in the presence of parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 131:300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrasco D, Borg AA, Kaitala A (2007) Egg-laying in relation to egg substrate in Gryon bolivari, an egg parasitoid of the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata). J Insect Behav 20:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cocroft RB (2002) Antipredator defense as a limited resource: unequal predation risk in broods of an insect with maternal care. Behav Ecol 13:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danks HV (2002) Modification of adverse conditions by insects. Oikos 99:10–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberhard W (1975) The ecology and behavior of a subsocial pentatomid bug and two scelionid wasps: strategy and counterstrategy in a host and its parasites. Smithson Contrib Zool 205:1–39Google Scholar
  8. Evans L, Schmidt O (eds) (1990) Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fatouros NE, Dicke M, Mumm R, Meiners T, Hilker M (2008) Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information. Behav Ecol 19:677–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton Univ Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomendio M, Garcia-Gonzalez F, Reguera P, Rivero A (2008) Male egg carrying in Phyllomorpha laciniata is favoured by natural not sexual selection. Anim Behav 75:763–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goubault M, Scott D, Hardy ICW (2007) The importance of offspring value: maternal defence in parasitoid contests. Anim Behav 74:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gross P (1993) Insect behavioral and morphological defenses against parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol 38:251–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffries MJ, Lawton JH (1984) Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol J Linn Soc 23:269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaitala A (1996) Oviposition on the back of conspecifics: an unusual reproductive tactic in a coreid bug. Oikos 77:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaitala A, Miettinen M (1997) Female egg dumping and the effect of sex ratio on male egg carrying in a coreid bug. Behav Ecol 8:429–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaitala A, Espadaler X, Lehtonen R (2000) Ant predation and the cost of egg carrying in the golden egg bug: experiments in the field. Oikos 89:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kudo S, Ishibashi E (1996) Maternal defence of a leaf beetle is not effective against parasitoids but is against pedestrian predators. Ethology 102:560–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mappes J, Kaitala A (1994) Experiments with Elasmucha grisea L. (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae): does a female parent bug lay as many eggs as she can defend? Behav Ecol 5:314–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCulloch CE, Searle SR (2001) Generalized, linear, and mixed models‎. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Miettinen M, Kaitala A, Espadaler X, Tannerfeldt M (2004) The effect of ant predation on survival and mating frequency of the golden egg bug in field experiments (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Heteroptera: Coreidae). Sociobiology 44:659–668Google Scholar
  22. Miettinen M, Kaitala A, Smith RL, Macías Ordóñez R (2006) Do egg carrying and protracted copulation affect mobility in the golden egg bug? J Insect Behav 19:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakahira T, Kudo S (2008) Maternal care in the burrower bug Adomerus triguttulus: defensive behavior. J Insect Behav 21:306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nomikou M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2003) Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring. Oecologia 136:484–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
  26. Reguera P, Gomendio M (2002) Flexible oviposition behavior in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata) and its implications for offspring survival. Behav Ecol 13:70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tallamy DW, Denno RF (1981) Maternal care in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera, Tingidae). Anim Behav 29:771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tallamy DW, Schaefer C (1997) Maternal care in the Hemiptera: ancestry, alternatives, and current adaptive value. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tay WT, Miettinen M, Kaitala A (2003) Do male golden egg bugs carry eggs they have fertilized? A microsatellite analysis. Behav Ecol 14:481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Venables WN, Ripley BD (1999) Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Vet LEM, Groenewold AW (1990) Semiochemicals and learning in parasitoids. J Chem Ecol 16:3119–3135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2002) Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News. 2/3:7-10. http://cran.r-project.org/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations