Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 63, Issue 8, pp 1149–1155 | Cite as

Differential aggressiveness between fire salamander (Salamandra infraimmaculata) larvae covaries with their genetic similarity

  • Shai Markman
  • Naomi Hill
  • Josephine Todrank
  • Giora Heth
  • Leon Blaustein
Original Paper


Responding differentially to kin and non-kin is known to be adaptive in many species. One example is the inclusive fitness benefits of reducing aggression toward closer relatives. Little is known, however, about the ability of animals to assess differential degrees of genetic relatedness and to respond accordingly with differential levels of aggression. In the present study, we tested whether aggressiveness between body mass-matched pairs of fire salamander (Salamandra infraimmaculata) larvae covaried with the genetic similarity between them. We quantified aggressiveness at three levels of genetic similarity by selecting pairs within and across pools from recently genotyped populations. We also assessed aggression between pairs of siblings. Aggression and associated injuries decreased as genetic similarity increased across the groups. These findings suggest that cannibalistic salamanders can assess their degree of genetic relatedness to conspecifics and vary their behavioral responses depending on the degree of similarity between them along a genetic relatedness continuum.


Genetic relatedness assessment Kin recognition Aggressive behavior Fire salamander Salamandra infraimmaculata 


  1. Bar-David S, Segev O, Peleg N, Hill N, Templeton AR, Schultz CB, Blaustein L (2007) Long distance movements by fire salamanders (Salamandra infraimmaculata) and implications for habitat fragmentation. Isr J Ecol Evol 53:143–159Google Scholar
  2. Bateson P (1983) Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson PPG (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 257–277Google Scholar
  3. Blaustein L, Friedman J, Fahima T (1996) Larval Salamandra drive temporary pool community dynamics: evidence from an artificial pool experiment. Oikos 76:392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busquet N, Baudoin C (2005) Odour similarities as a basis for discriminating degrees of kinship in rodents: evidence from Mus spicilegus. Anim Behav 70:997–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen M, Flam R, Sharon R, Ifrach H, Yeheskely-Hayon D, Warburg MR (2005) The evolutionary significance of intra-cohort cannibalism in larvae of a xeric-inhabiting salamander: an inter-cohort comparison. Curr Herpetol 24:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawley EM (1984) Recognition of individual, sex and species odors by salamanders Plethodon glutinosus and Plethodon jordani complex. Anim Behav 32:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawley EM (1986) The evolution of chemical signals as a premating isolating mechanism in a complex of terrestrial salamanders. In: Duvall D, Muller-Schwarze D, Silverstein RM (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 4. Plenum, New York, pp 241–224Google Scholar
  8. Degani G (1993) Cannibalism among Salamandra salamandra larvae. Isr J Zool 39:125–129Google Scholar
  9. Degani G (1996) Salamandra salamandra at the southern limit of its distribution. Laser Pages Publishing, Jerusalem, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  10. Eitam A, Blaustein L (2002) Noninvasive individual identification of larval Salamandra using tailfin spot patterns. Amphib-reptil 23:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eitam A, Blaustein L, Mangel M (2005) Density and intercohort priority effects on larval Salamandra salamandra in temporary pools. Oecologia 146:36–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons ME, Ferguson AM, Lee DR, Jaeger RG (2003) Mother-offspring discrimination in the red-backed salamander may be context dependent. Herpetologica 59:322–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heth G, Todrank J (2000) Individual odour similarities across species parallel phylogenetic relationships in the S. ehrenbergi superspecies of mole rats. Anim Behav 60:789–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heth G, Todrank J, Busquet N, Baudoin C (2003) Genetic relatedness assessment through individual odour similarities (G-ratios) in mice. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 78:595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes J, Goudkamp K, Hurwood D, Hancock M, Bunn S (2003) Translocation causes extinction of a local population of the freshwater shrimp Paratya australiensis. Conserv Biol 17:1007–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaib M, Jmhasly P, Wilfert L, Durka W, Franke S, Francke W, Leuthold RH, Brandl R (2004) Cuticular hydrocarbons and aggression in the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus. J Chem Ecol 30:365–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masters BS, Forester DC (1995) Kin recognition in a brooding salamander. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 261:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peleg N (2009) Studies on the conservation of the fire salamander, Salamandra infraimmaculata, in Israel. PhD dissertation. University of Haifa, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  20. Pfennig DW (1997) Kinship and cannibalism. Bioscience 47:667–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pfennig DW, Collins JP (1993) Kinship affects morphogenesis in cannibalistic salamanders. Nature 362:836–838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfennig DW, Sherman PW, Collins JP (1994) Kin recognition and cannibalism in polymorphic salamanders. Behav Ecol 5:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reques R, Tejedo M (1996) Intraspecific aggressive behaviour in fire salamander larvae (Salamandra salamandra): the effects of density and body size. J Herpetol 6:15–19Google Scholar
  25. Steinfartz S, Stemshorn K, Kuesters D, Tautz D (2006) Patterns of multiple paternity within and between annual reproduction cycles of the fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) under natural conditions. J Zool 268:1–8Google Scholar
  26. Templeton AR (1986) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Soule M (ed) Conservation biology: science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 105–116Google Scholar
  27. Thornhill NW (ed) (1993) The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding. Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Todrank J, Heth G (2003) Odor-genes covariance and genetic relatedness assessment: rethinking odor-based “recognition” mechanisms in rodents. Adv Study Behav 32:77–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Todrank J, Busquet N, Baudoin C, Heth G (2005) Preferences of newborn mice for odours indicating closer genetic relatedness: is experience necessary? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2083–2088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verrell PA (1999) Geographic variation in sexual behaviour: sex, signals, and speciation. In: Foster SA, Endler JA (eds) Geographic variation in behaviour: perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 262–282Google Scholar
  32. Verrell PA (2003) Population and species divergence of chemical cues that influence mate recognition of females in desmognathine salamanders. Ethology 109:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walls SC, Jaeger RG (1987) Aggression and exploitation as mechanisms of competition in larval salamanders. Can J Zool 65:2938–2944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walls SC, Roudebush RE (1991) Reduced aggression toward siblings as evidence of kin recognition in cannibalistic salamanders. Am Nat 138:1027–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warburg MR (1994) Population ecology, breeding activity, longevity, and reproductive strategies of Salamandra salamandra during an 18-year long study of an isolated population on Mt. Carmel, Israel. Mertensiella 4:399–421Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shai Markman
    • 1
  • Naomi Hill
    • 2
  • Josephine Todrank
    • 2
  • Giora Heth
    • 2
  • Leon Blaustein
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Science EducationUniversity of Haifa – OranimTivonIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Evolution and Department of Environmental and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations