Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 63, Issue 7, pp 967–973 | Cite as

Animal social networks: an introduction

Review

Abstract

Network analysis has a long history in the mathematical and social sciences and the aim of this introduction is to provide a brief overview of the potential that it holds for the study of animal behaviour. One of the most attractive features of the network paradigm is that it provides a single conceptual framework with which we can study the social organisation of animals at all levels (individual, dyad, group, population) and for all types of interaction (aggressive, cooperative, sexual etc.). Graphical tools allow a visual inspection of networks which often helps inspire ideas for testable hypotheses. Network analysis itself provides a multitude of novel statistical tools that can be used to characterise social patterns in animal populations. Among the important insights that networks have facilitated is that indirect social connections matter. Interactions between individuals generate a social environment at the population level which in turn selects for behavioural strategies at the individual level. A social network is often a perfect means by which to represent heterogeneous relationships in a population. Probing the biological drivers for these heterogeneities, often as a function of time, forms the basis of many of the current uses of network analysis in the behavioural sciences. This special issue on social networks brings together a diverse group of practitioners whose study systems range from social insects over reptiles to birds, cetaceans, ungulates and primates in order to illustrate the wide-ranging applications of network analysis.

Keywords

Social networks Animal interactions Social organisation 

References

  1. Biggs N, Lloyd E, Wilson R (1986) Graph Theory, 1736–1936. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows, version 6: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  3. Camazine S, Deneubourg J, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couzin ID, Krause J (2003) Self-organisation and collective behaviour of vertebrates. Adv Study Behav 32:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 271:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croft DP, James R, Thomas P, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM (2004) Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 41:879–892Google Scholar
  11. Eagle N, Pentland A (2009) Eigenbehaviors: identifying structure in routine. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0739-0 Google Scholar
  12. Fewell JH (2003) Social insect networks. Science 301:1867–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J, Sundaresen SR, Cordingly JE, Rubenstein DI (2009) Reproductive status influences group size and persistence of bonds in male plains zebra (Equus burchelli). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0723-8 Google Scholar
  14. Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franks DW, Ruxton GD, James R, Noble J (2009) Developing a methodology for social network sampling. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0729-2 Google Scholar
  16. Godfrey SS, Bull CM, James R, Murray K (2009) Network structure and parasite transmission in a group-living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0730-9 Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78:1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henzi SP, Lusseau D, Weingrill T, van Schaik CP, Barrett L (2009) Cyclicity in the structure of female baboon social networks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0720-y Google Scholar
  19. Hinde RA (1976) Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man 11:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James R, Croft DP, Krause J (2009) Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0742-5 Google Scholar
  21. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Krause J, Croft DP, James R (2007) Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krause S, Mattner L, James R, Guttridge T, Corcoran MJ, Gruber SH, Krause J (2009) Social network analysis and valid Markov Chain Monte Carlo tests of null models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0746-1
  24. Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270:186–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lusseau D, Conradt L (2009) The emergence of unshared consensus decisions in bottlenose dolphins. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0740-7 Google Scholar
  26. Lusseau D, Whitehead H, Gero S (2008) Applying network methods to the study of animal social structures. Anim Behav 75:1809–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. PNAS 104:10910–10914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDonald DB (2009) Young-boy networks without kin clusters in a lek-mating manakin. Behav Ecol Sociobiol doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0722-9 Google Scholar
  30. Naug D (2008) Structure of the social network and its influence on transmission dynamics in a honeybee colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1719–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naug D (2009) Structure and resilience of the social network in an insect colony as a function of colony size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0721-x Google Scholar
  32. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441:502–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramos-Fernández G, Boyer D, Gómez VP (2006) A complex social structure with fission–fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:536–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramos-Fernández G, Boyer D, Aureli F, Vick LG (2009) Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0719-4 Google Scholar
  36. Santos FC, Santos MD, Pacheco JM (2008) Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454:213–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott J (2000) Social network analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Sih A, Hanser SF, McHugh KA (2009) Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioural ecologists. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0725-6 Google Scholar
  39. Sundaresan SR, Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J, Rubenstein DI (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission–fusion species, Grevy's zebra and onager. Oecologia 151:140–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vonhof MJ, Whitehead H, Fenton MB (2004) Analysis of Spix’s disc-winged bat association patterns and roosting home ranges reveal a novel social structure among bats. Anim Behav 68:507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordán F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitehead H (2008) Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitehead H, Dufault S (1999) Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: review and recommendations. Adv Study Behav 28:33–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Wittemyer G, Douglas-Hamilton I, Getz WM (2005) The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Anim Behav 69:1357–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav 74:1293–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Integrative and Comparative BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Institute of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations