Sperm design and variation in the New World blackbirds (Icteridae)
- 232 Downloads
Post-copulatory sexual selection (PCSS) is thought to be one of the evolutionary forces responsible for the rapid and divergent evolution of sperm design. However, whereas in some taxa particular sperm traits are positively associated with PCSS, in other taxa, these relationships are negative, and the causes of these different patterns across taxa are poorly understood. In a comparative study using New World blackbirds (Icteridae), we tested whether sperm design was influenced by the level of PCSS and found significant positive associations with the level of PCSS for all sperm components but head length. Additionally, whereas the absolute length of sperm components increased, their variation declined with the intensity of PCSS, indicating stabilising selection around an optimal sperm design. Given the diversity of, and strong selection on, sperm design, it seems likely that sperm phenotype may influence sperm velocity within species. However, in contrast to other recent studies of passerine birds, but consistent with several other studies, we found no significant link between sperm design and velocity, using four different species that vary both in sperm design and PCSS. Potential reasons for this discrepancy between studies are discussed.
KeywordsSperm competition Sperm morphology Sperm velocity Phylogenetic analysis Passerine birds
We thank J. Homan, P. Llambias, N. López, D. Ortiz, L. Reinhardt, J. Ross, C. and F. Ruiz, K. Soria and A. Trutsch for their help in the field. Additional sperm samples were provided by the Alaska Bird Observatory, Bird Collection of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Museo de La Plata Buenos Aires, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Museum of Wildlife and Fish Biology UC Davis, Proyecto Recuperación de la Mariquita, M. Avery, A. Azpiroz, M. Conway, K. Ellison, D. Elwonger, A. Fonseca, S. Immler, W. Janousek, R. Keith, D. Maddox, R. Meese, B. Ortiz, B. Peer, T. Pepps, N. Perlut, R. Rehmeier, J. Rivers, V. Rohwer, B. Sandercock, W. Ward, C. Willis and G. Young. We also thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments on our manuscript. S. L. was supported by the Janggen-Poehn Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, a Sheffield University Overseas Research Student Award, a Lauff Research Award and an NSF LTER Graduate Research Award; T. R. B. was funded by the Leverhulme Trust. All samples were collected under licence of the respective institutions or collaborators and, within the US, under an additional collective Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit (MB 131466).
- Beatty RA (1972) The genetics of size and shape of spermatozoan organelles. In: Glueckson-Waelsch S (ed) The genetics of the spermatozoa. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 97–115Google Scholar
- Burrows WH, Quinn JP (1937) The collection of spermatozoa from domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 16:19–24Google Scholar
- Cohen J (1977) Reproduction. Butterworths, London, UKGoogle Scholar
- Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Franzén Å (1970) Phylogenetic aspects of the morphology of spermatozoa and spermiogenesis. In: Baccetti B (ed) Comparative spermatology. Academic Press, New York, pp 29–45Google Scholar
- Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Jamieson BGM (1987) The ultrastructure and phylogeny of insect spermatozoa. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Moore HDM, Akhondi MA (1996) Fertilizing capacity of rat spermatozoa is correlated with decline in strait-line velocity measured by continuous computer-aided sperm analysis: epididymal rat spermatozoa from the proximal cauda have a greater fertilizing capacity in vitro than those from the distal cauda or vas deferens. J Androl 17:50–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mossman J (2008) The role of mitochondrial genetic variation on sperm function: empirical tests of the Frank and Hurst hypothesis. Ph.D. thesis. University of Sheffield, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
- Pitnick S, Hosken DJ, Birkhead TR (2009) Sperm diversity. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Elsevier, London, pp 69–149Google Scholar