Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 12, pp 1843–1849 | Cite as

Seminal fluid enhances sperm viability in the leafcutter ant Atta colombica

  • Susanne P. A. den BoerEmail author
  • Jacobus J. Boomsma
  • Boris Baer
Original Paper


The seminal fluid that accompanies sperm in ejaculates has been shown or suggested to affect sperm competition and paternity success of insects by preventing female remating, inducing oviposition, and forming mating plugs. In Atta leafcutter ants, queens have multiple mates but never remate later in life, although they may live and produce fertilized eggs for several decades. The mating biology and life history of these ants therefore suggests that the major function of seminal fluid is to maximize sperm viability during copulation, sperm transfer, and initial sperm storage. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the viability of testis sperm and ejaculated sperm (mixed with seminal fluid) and found a significant positive effect of seminal fluid on sperm viability. We further quantified this positive effect by adding accessory gland secretion (a major component of seminal fluid) in a dilution series, to show that minute quantities of accessory gland secretion achieve significant increases in sperm viability. Sperm stored by queens for 1 year benefited in a similar way from being exposed to accessory gland compounds after dissection in control saline solution. Our results provide the first empirical evidence that seminal fluid is important for the production of viable ejaculates and that the accessory glands of Atta males—despite their small size—are functional and produce a very potent secretion.


Social insects Mating Sperm storage Sperm transfer Spermatheca Accessory glands 



We thank Aniek Ivens and Jens Broch for collecting ants in the field, David Nash for statistical support, Francisco García-González for assistance with the Live/Dead™ protocol, and Leigh Simmons for valuable comments on the manuscript. We thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama for facilities and logistic support and the Autoridad Nacional de Ambiente (ANAM) for issuing collecting and export permits. This work was supported by grants from the Danish National Research Foundation to SPAdB and JJB and an Australian Research Council Fellowship to BB.


  1. Baer B (2003) Bumblebees as model organisms to study male sexual selection in social insects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer B (2005) Sexual selection in Apis bees. Apidologie 36:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2004) Male reproductive investment and queen mating-frequency in fungus-growing ants. Behav Ecol 15:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baer B, Boomsma JJ (2006) Mating biology of the leaf-cutting ants Atta colombica and Atta cephalotes. J Morphol 267:1165–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer B, Morgan E-D, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:3926–3928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baer B, Armitage S, Boomsma JJ (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 44:872–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernasconi G, Hellriegel B, Heyland A, Ward PI (2002) Sperm survival in the female reproductive tract in the fly Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). J Insect Physiol 48:197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boomsma JJ (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17:R673–R683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:395–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman T, Davies SJ (2004) Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Peptides 25:1477–1490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen PS (1984) The functional morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory glands and their secretions. Annu Rev Entomol 29:233–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole B (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins AM (2000) Survival of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) spermatozoa stored at above-freezing temperatures. J Econ Entomol 93:568–571PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins AM, Donoghue AM (1999) Viability assessment of honey bee Apis mellifera sperm using dual fluorescent staining. Theriogenology 51:1513–1523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins AM, Caperna TJ, Williams V, Garrett WM, Evans JD (2006) Proteomic analyses of male contributions to honey bee sperm storage and mating. Insect Mol Biol 15:541–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colonello NA, Hartfelder K (2005) She’s my girl—male accessory gland products and their function in the reproductive biology of social bees. Apidologie 36:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damiens D, Bressac C, Brillard J-P, Chevrier C (2002) Qualitative aspects of sperm stock in males and females from Eupelmus orientalis and Dinarmus basalis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) as revealed by dual fluorescence. Physiol Entomol 27:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demary K (2005) Sperm storage and viability in Photinus fireflies. J Insect Physiol 51:837–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fjerdingstad EJ, Boomsma JJ (1998) Multiple mating increases the sperm stores of Atta colombica leafcutter ant queens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fjerdingstad EJ, Boomsma JJ, Thorén P (1998) Multiple paternity in the leafcutter ant Atta colombica—a microsatellite DNA study. Heredity 80:118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fry CL, Wilkinson GS (2004) Sperm survival in female stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution 58:1622–1626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. García-González F, Simmons LW (2005) Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition. Curr Biol 15:271–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillott C (2003) Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu Rev Entomol 48:163–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgson D, Hosken D (2006) Sperm competition promotes the exploitation of rival ejaculates. J Theor Biol 243:230–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hölldobler B, Bartz SH (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioural ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 237–257Google Scholar
  26. Hunter FM, Birkhead TR (2002) Sperm viability and sperm competition in insects. Curr Biol 12:121–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller L (1998) Queen lifespan and colony characteristics in ants and termites. Insectes Soc 45:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koeniger N, Koeniger G (1991) An evolutionary approach to mating behaviour and drone copulatory organs in Apis. Apidologie 22:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koeniger N, Koeniger G, Wongsiri S (1989) Mating and sperm transfer in Apis florea. Apidologie 20:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kubli E (2003) Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male. CMLS Cell Mol Life Sci 60:1689–1704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mikheyev AS (2003) Evidence for mating plugs in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Insectes Soc 50:401–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poiani A (2006) Complexity of a seminal fluid: a review. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ravi Ram K, Wolfner MF (2007) Seminal influences: Drosophila Acps and the molecular interplay between males and females during reproduction. Integr Comp Biol 47:427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sauter A, Brown MJF, Baer B, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) Males of social insects can prevent queens from multiple mating. Proc R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 268:1449–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schley P (1987) Einführung in die Technik der instrumentellen Besamung von Bienenköniginnen. Köhler Offset KG, GiessenGoogle Scholar
  36. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas ML, Simmons LW (2007) Male crickets adjust the viability of their sperm in response to female mating status. Am Nat 170:190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weber NA (1972) Gardening ants, the attines. The American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  39. Woyke J (1983) Dynamics of entry of spermatozoa into the spermatheca of instrumentally inseminated queen honey bees. J Apicult Res 22:150–154Google Scholar
  40. Yapici N, Kim YJ, Ribeiro C, Dickson BJ (2008) A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour. Nature 451:33–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne P. A. den Boer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jacobus J. Boomsma
    • 1
  • Boris Baer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Social Evolution, Department of BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, MCS Building M316The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology (M092)The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations