Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 10, pp 1633–1641 | Cite as

Reproductive strategy and singing activity: blue tit and great tit compared

  • Valentin Amrhein
  • Lars Erik Johannessen
  • Lena Kristiansen
  • Tore Slagsvold
Original Paper

Abstract

The costs and benefits of bird song are likely to vary among species, and different singing patterns may reflect differences in reproductive strategies. We compared temporal patterns of singing activity in two songbird species, the blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) and the great tit (Parus major). The two species live side by side year round, and they have similar breeding ecology and similar rates of extra-pair paternity. However, they differ in two aspects of reproductive strategy that may have an influence on song output: blue tits are facultatively polygynous and have a fairly short breeding season with almost no second broods, whereas great tits are socially monogamous but more commonly raise second broods. We found that great tit males continued singing at high levels during the egg-laying and incubation periods, while monogamously paired blue tit males strongly reduced singing activity after the first days of egg-laying by their female. Since males of both species sang much more intensely shortly before sunrise than after sunrise, at midday or in the evening, this difference was most conspicuous at dawn. No differences in singing activity were found within species when testing for male age. We suggest that in contrast to blue tits, great tit males continued singing after egg-laying to defend the territory and to encourage the female for a possible second brood.

Keywords

Reproductive strategy Singing activity Dawn chorus Blue tit Great tit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jo Franckx, Eirik Grønningsæter and Dávid Kováts for help in the field, and the Haakonsen, Johnsen, Johnsrud and Vestgård families for kind permissions to work on their premises. Bo Terning Hansen, Pius Korner, Fraenzi Korner-Nievergelt and Hans-Rudolf Roth gave invaluable comments during field work and data analysis. The research was funded by grants to V.A. from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Nikolaus und Bertha Burckhardt-Bürgin-Stiftung and the Basler Stiftung für experimentelle Zoologie.

References

  1. Amrhein V, Korner P, Naguib M (2002) Nocturnal and diurnal singing activity in the nightingale: correlations with mating status and breeding cycle. Anim Behav 64:939–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amrhein V, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2004a) Seasonal patterns of singing activity vary with time of day in the Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Auk 121:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amrhein V, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2004b) Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus. Proc R Soc Lond B (Suppl.) 271:S167–S169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Cramp S, Perrins, CM (eds) (1993) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol 7. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuthill IC, Macdonald WA (1990) Experimental manipulation of the dawn and dusk chorus in the blackbird Turdus merula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NB, Houston AI (1984) Territory economics. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 148–169Google Scholar
  9. De Laet JF, Dhondt AA (1989) Weight loss of the female during the first brood as a factor influencing second brood initiation in great tits Parus major and blue tits Parus caeruleus. Ibis 131:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhondt AA (1987) Polygynous blue tits and monogamous great tits: does the polygyny-threshold model hold? Am Nat 129:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Double M, Cockburn A (2000) Pre-dawn infidelity: females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foerster K, Poesel A, Kunc H, Kempenaers B (2002) The natural plasma testosterone profile of male blue tits during the breeding season and its relation to song output. J Avian Biol 33:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gammon DE (2004) Black-capped chickadee dawn chorus and subsequent sexual activity. Wilson Bull 116:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill FB, Slikas B, Sheldon FH (2005) Phylogeny of titmice (Paridae): II. Species relationships based on sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene. Auk 122:121–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glutz von Blotzheim UN (ed) (1993) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 13/1. AULA-Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  16. Gorissen L, Eens M (2004) Interactive communication between male and female great tits (Parus major) during the dawn chorus. Auk 121:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen BT, Slagsvold T (2003) Rival imprinting: interspecifically cross-fostered tits defend their territories against heterospecific intruders. Anim Behav 65:1117–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasselquist D, Bensch S (1991) Trade-off between mate guarding and mate attraction in the polygynous great reed warbler. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Helm B, Piersma T, Van der Jeugd H (2006) Sociable schedules: interplay between avian seasonal and social behaviour. Anim Behav 72:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinde RA (1952) The behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some other related species. Behav Suppl 2:1–207Google Scholar
  21. Hyman J, Hughes M, Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2004) Individual variation in the strength of territory defense in male song sparrows: correlations of age, territory tenure, and neighbor aggressiveness. Behaviour 141:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenni L, Winkler R (1994) Moult and ageing in European passerines. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Johannessen LE, Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, Lifjeld JT (2005) Manipulation of male quality in wild tits: effects on paternity loss. Behav Ecol 16:747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kacelnik A, Krebs JR (1983) The dawn chorus in the great tit (Parus major): proximate and ultimate causes. Behaviour 83:287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kempenaers B (1994) Polygyny in the blue tit: unbalanced sex ratio and female aggression restrict mate choice. Anim Behav 47:943–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Dhondt AA (1995) Mate guarding and copulation behaviour in monogamous and polygynous blue tits: do males follow a best-of-a-bad-job strategy? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krokene C, Rigstad K, Dale M, Lifjeld JT (1998) The function of extrapair paternity in blue tits and great tits: good genes or fertility insurance? Behav Ecol 9:649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu W-C (2004) The effect of neighbours and females on dawn and daytime singing behaviours by male chipping sparrows. Anim Behav 68:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mace R (1986) The importance of female behaviour in the dawn chorus. Anim Behav 34:621–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mace R (1987a) Why do birds sing at dawn? Ardea 75:123–132Google Scholar
  31. Mace R (1987b) The dawn chorus in the great tit Parus major is directly related to female fertility. Nature 330:745–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mace R (1989a) The relationship between daily routines of singing and foraging: an experiment on captive Great Tits Parus major. Ibis 131:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mace R (1989b) A comparison of great tits' (Parus major) use of time in different daylengths at three European sites. J Anim Ecol 58:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morse DH (1989) Song patterns of warblers at dawn and dusk. Wilson Bull 101:26–35Google Scholar
  35. Nilsson J-Å, Svensson E (1996) The cost of reproduction: a new link between current reproductive effort and future reproductive success. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1305–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinxten R, Eens M (1998) Male starlings sing most in the late morning, following egg-laying: a strategy to protect their paternity? Behaviour 135:1197–1211Google Scholar
  38. Poesel A, Dabelsteen T, Pedersen SB (2004) Dawn song of male blue tits as a predictor of competitiveness in midmorning singing interactions. Acta Ethol 6:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poesel A, Kunc HP, Foerster K, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B (2006) Early birds are sexy: male age, dawn song and extrapair paternity in blue tits, Cyanistes (formerly Parus) caeruleus. Anim Behav 72:531–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
  41. Sasvári L (1986) Reproductive effort of widowed birds. J Anim Ecol 55:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Slagsvold T, Rohwer S (2000) Sexual conflict in birds with biparental care: should a parent desert a brood with low reproductive value? Ornis Norvegica 23:38–49Google Scholar
  43. Slagsvold T, Dale S, Sætre G-P (1994) Dawn singing in the great tit (Parus major): mate attraction, mate guarding, or territorial defence? Behaviour 131:115–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, Johannessen LE, Lifjeld JT (2002) Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1449–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spector DA (1992) Wood-Warbler song systems - A review of paruline singing behaviors. Curr Orn 9:199–238Google Scholar
  46. Staicer CA, Spector DA, Horn AG (1996) The dawn chorus and other diel patterns in acoustic signaling. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp 426–453Google Scholar
  47. Tobias J, Seddon N (2000) Territoriality as a paternity guard in the European robin, Erithacus rubecula. Anim Behav 60:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verhulst S (2003) Song as a signal to negotiate a sexual conflict? Anim Biol 53:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Welling P, Koivula K, Orell M (1997) Dawn chorus and female behaviour in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ibis 139:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentin Amrhein
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lars Erik Johannessen
    • 1
  • Lena Kristiansen
    • 1
  • Tore Slagsvold
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Research Station Petite Camargue AlsacienneSaint-LouisFrance
  3. 3.Zoological InstituteUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations