Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 8, pp 1319–1331 | Cite as

Why are larvae of the social parasite wasp Polistes sulcifer not removed from the host nest?

  • R. CervoEmail author
  • F. R. Dani
  • C. Cotoneschi
  • C. Scala
  • I. Lotti
  • J. E. Strassmann
  • D. C. Queller
  • S. Turillazzi
Original Paper

Abstract

A challenge for parasites is how to evade the sophisticated detection and rejection abilities of potential hosts. Many studies have shown how insect social parasites overcome host recognition systems and successfully enter host colonies. However, once a social parasite has successfully usurped an alien nest, its brood still face the challenge of avoiding host recognition. How immature stages of parasites fool the hosts has been little studied in social insects, though this has been deeply investigated in birds. We look at how larvae of the paper wasp obligate social parasite Polistes sulcifer fool their hosts. We focus on cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), which are keys for adult recognition, and use behavioral recognition assays. Parasite larvae might camouflage themselves either by underproducing CHCs (odorless hypothesis) or by acquiring a chemical profile that matches that of their hosts. GC/MS analyses show that parasite larvae do not have lower levels of CHCs and that their CHCs profile is similar to the host larval profile but shows a reduced colony specificity. Behavioral tests show that the hosts discriminate against alien conspecific larvae from different colonies but are more tolerant towards parasite larvae. Our results demonstrate that parasite larvae have evolved a host larval profile, which overcomes the host colony recognition system probably because of the lower proportion of branched compounds compared to host larvae. In some ways, this is a similar hypothesis to the odorless hypothesis, but it assumes that the parasite larvae are covered by a chemical blend that is not meaningful to the host.

Keywords

Polistes wasps Obligate social parasites Nest–mate recognition Parasite integration Larval recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Wendy Castle for help genotyping larvae and Marcus Kronforst for his support with the genetic data analysis, particularly with the STRUCTURE program. We thank Mr. Daniele Melotti for permission to collect wasps from his property. We are grateful to the anonymous referees for their very helpful comments. The experiments reported comply with the current laws of the countries in which they were performed. This research was based on work supported by University of Florence and by the US National Science Foundation under Grant IBN-9975351. Financial support was provided by the Ente Cassa di Risparmio through a fellowship to FRD (within the grant 2003/0964) and a fellowship “Ficai” to CC.

References

  1. Akino T, Knapp JJ, Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1999) Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1419–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagnères A-G, Lorenzi MC, Dusticier G, Turillazzi S, Clément JL (1996) Chemical usurpation of a nest by paper wasp parasites. Science 272:889–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Theraulaz G, Bagnères AG, Roux M, Pratte M, Provost E, Clément JL (1991) Cuticular hydrocarbons, social organization and ovarian development in a polistine wasp: Polistes dominulus Christ. Comp Biochem Physiol 100B:667–680Google Scholar
  4. Cervo R (1990) Il parassitismo sociale nei Polistes (PhD dissertation). University of Florence, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
  5. Cervo R (1994) Morphological adaptations to the parasitic life in Polistes sulcifer and Polistes atrimandibularis (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ethol Ecol Evol (Spec. issue) 3:61–66Google Scholar
  6. Cervo R (2006) An overview on Polistes parasites and their hosts. Ann Zool Fenn 43:531–549Google Scholar
  7. Cervo R, Dani FR (1996) Social parasitism and its evolution in Polistes. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 98–112Google Scholar
  8. Cervo R, Macinai V, Dechigi F, Turillazzi S (2004) Fast growth of immature brood in a social parasite wasp: a convergent evolution between avian and insect cuckoos. Am Nat 164:814–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotoneschi C, Dani FR, Cervo R, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S (2007) Polistes dominulus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) larvae possess their own chemical signatures. J Insect Physiol 53(9):954–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dani FR, Morgan ED, Turillazzi S (1996) Dufour gland secretion of Polistes wasp: chemical composition and possible involvement in nestmate recognition (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Physiol 42:541–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dani FR, Jones GR, Destri S, Spencer SH, Turillazzi S (2001) Deciphering recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps. Anim Behav 62:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dapporto L, Cervo R, Sledge MF, Turillazzi S (2004) Rank integration in dominance hierarchies of host colonies by the paper wasp social parasite Polistes sulcifer (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). J Insect Physiol 50:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dettner K, Liepert C (1994) Chemical mimicry and camouflage. Annu Rev Entomol 39:129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmes GW, Barr B, Thomas JA, Clarke RT (1999) Extreme host specificity by Microdon mutabilis (Diptera: Syrphidae), a social parasite of ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamboa GJ (1996) Kin recognition in social wasps. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 161–17Google Scholar
  17. Gamboa GJ (2004) Kin recognition in eusocial wasps. Ann Zool Fennici 41:789–808Google Scholar
  18. Henshaw M (2000) Microsatellite loci for the social wasp Polistes dominulus and their application in other wasps. Mol Ecol 9:2155–2157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard RW, Stanley-Samuelson DW, Akre R (1990) Biosynthesis and chemical mimicry of cuticular hydrocarbons from the obligate predato, Microdon albicomatus Novak (Diptera: Syrphidae) and its ant prey, Myrmica incompleta Provancher (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 63:437–443Google Scholar
  20. Johnson CA, Topoff H, Vander Meer RK, Lavine B (2005) Do these eggs smell funny to you?: an experimental study of egg discrimination by hosts of the social parasite Polyergus breviceps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenoir A, D’Ettorre P, Errard C (2001) Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu Rev Entomol 46:573–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorenzi MC (2003) Social wasp parasites affect the nestmate recognition abilities of their hosts (Polistes atrimandibularis and P. biglumis, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 50:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lorenzi MC (2006) The result of an arm race: the chemical strategies of Polistes social parasites. Ann Zool Fenn 43:550–563Google Scholar
  24. Lorenzi MC, Bagnères A-G (2002) Concealing identity and mimicking hosts: adual chemical strategy for a single social parasite? (Polistes atrimandibularis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Parasitology 125:507–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenzi MC, Filippone F (2000) Opportunistic discrimination of alien eggs by social wasps (Polistes biglumis, Hymenoptera Vespidae): a defense against social parasitism? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorenzi MC, Bagnères A-G, Clément JL (1996) The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in social societies: is it the same in paper wasps? In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 178–189Google Scholar
  27. Lorenzi MC, Cervo R, Turillazzi S (1992) Effects of social parasitism of Polistes atrimandibularis on the colony cycle and brood production of Polistes biglumis bimaculatus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Boll Zool 59:267–271Google Scholar
  28. Lorenzi MC, Cervo R, Zacchi F, Turillazzi S, Bagnères A-G (2004) Dynamics of chemical mimicry in the social parasite wasp Polistes semenowi (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Parasitology 129:643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mundry R, Fischer J (1998) Use of statistical programs for non parametric tests of small sample often leads to incorrect P value: examples from Animal Behavior. Anim Behav 56:256–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panek LM, Gamboa GJ (2000) Queens of the paper wasp Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) discriminate among larvae on the basis of relatedness. Ethology 106:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schonrogge K, Wardlaw JC, Peters AJ, Everett S, Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2004) Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J Chem Ecol 30:91–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singer TL, Espelie KE (1992) Social wasps use nest paper hydrocarbons for nestmate recognition. Anim Behav 44:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singer TL, Espelie KE (1996) Nest surface hydrocarbons facilitate nestmate recognition for Polistes metricus Say. J Insect Behav 9:857–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singer TL, Espelie KE, Gamboa GJ (1998) Nest and nestmate discrimination in independent-founding paper wasps. In: Vander Meer RK, Breed MD, Winston M, Espelie K (eds) Pheromone communication in social insects: ants, bees, wasps, and termites. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 104–125Google Scholar
  36. Sledge MF, Dani FR, Cervo R, Dapporto L, Turillazzi S (2001) Recognition of social parasites as nest-mates: adoption of colony-specific host cuticular odors by the paper wasp parasite Polistes sulcifer. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2253–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strassmann JE, Solís CR, Peters JM, Queller DC (1996) Strategies for finding and using highly polymorphic DNA microsatellite loci for studies of genetic relatedness and pedigrees. In: Ferraris JD, Palumbi SR (eds) Molecular zoology: advances, strategies and protocols. Wiley, New York, pp 163–180 528–549Google Scholar
  38. Strassmann JE, Seppä P, Queller DC (2000) Absence of within-colony kin discrimination: foundresses of the social wasp, Polistes carolina, do not prefer their own larvae. Naturwissenschaften 87:266–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turillazzi S, Sledge MF, Dani FR, Cervo R, Massolo A, Fondelli L (2000) Social hackers: integration in the host chemical recognition system by a paper wasp social parasite. Naturwissenschaften 87:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Cervo
    • 1
    Email author
  • F. R. Dani
    • 2
  • C. Cotoneschi
    • 1
  • C. Scala
    • 3
  • I. Lotti
    • 1
  • J. E. Strassmann
    • 3
  • D. C. Queller
    • 3
  • S. Turillazzi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e GeneticaUniversità di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Centro Interdipartimentale di Spettrometria di MassaUniversità di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations