Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 6, pp 923–933 | Cite as

Wait before running for your life: defensive tactics of spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) in evading barn owl (Tyto alba) attack

Original Paper

Abstract

Raptor–prey encounters were studied to evaluate the strategies and success rate of both predator attack and prey defense. We compared the success of barn owls in catching stationary simulated prey (food item) with that of moving prey (food item that was pulled in various directions). We also tracked real encounters between barn owls and spiny mice in a captive environment. It was found that owls had higher success in attacking stationary prey and that they seemed to attack the prey as soon as it became motionless. When attacked, only a few spiny mice remained immobile (freeze response) whereas most fled and usually avoided capture by the owls. It was also found that spiny mice displayed a preference to escape in those directions in which owls had demonstrated a lower success in catching the simulated prey. Escape initiation dichotomized to a short or long (but rarely intermediate) distance between the spiny mouse and the owl with more successful avoidance at short-distance (last-moment) escapes. The best predictor of escape success was the velocity of the spiny mouse, and the second best predictor was its flight initiation distance (FID). We present an update for Ydenberg and Dill’s model for optimal FID in close encounters, suggesting that fleeing at the last moment is advantageous. However, a last-moment attempt to escape is also more risky with a split second differing between life and death, and is therefore appropriate mainly for agile prey under close-distance attack.

Keywords

Flight initiation distance (FID) Anti-predator behavior Predator–prey interactions Predation risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Maoz Perlman and Yelena Golan for their help in the experimentation and analyses, to the zookeepers of the I. Meier Segals Garden for Zoological Research for their help in rearing the owls and rodents, and to Naomi Paz for editing the manuscript. This study was carried out under the regulations and approval of the Institutional Committee for Animal Experimentation (permit #L-05-059). The design carefully followed the Guidelines for the Treatment of Animals in Behavioural Research and Teaching (Animal Behaviour 2001) with special emphasis on the Guidelines for Staged Encounters as outlined by Huntingford (1984).

References

  1. Anonymous (2001) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 61:271–275Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein DT (2002) Moving to suburbia: ontogenetic and evolutionary consequences of life on predator-free islands. J Biogeogr 29:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumstein DT (2003) Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manage 67:852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT, Anthony LL, Harcourt R, Ross G (2003) Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? Biol Conserv 110:97–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolles RC (1970) Species-specific defense reaction and avoidance learning. Psychol Rev 77:32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonenfant M, Kramer DL (1996) The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax. Behav Ecol 7:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper WE Jr (1999) Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting, and antipredatory behavior by a lizard, Eumeces laticeps. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper WE Jr, Perez-Mellado V, Baird T, Baird TA, Caldwell JP, Vitt LJ (2003) Effects of risk, cost, and their interaction on optimal escape by nonrefuging Bonaire whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus murinus. Behav Ecol 14:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cresswell W (1993) Escape responses by redshanks, Tringa tetanus, on attack by avian predators. Anim Behav 46:609–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cresswell W (1996) Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, peregrines Falco peregrinus, and merlins F. columbarius. Ibis 138:684–692Google Scholar
  11. Curio E (1976) The ethology of predation. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Desy EA, Batzli GO, Liu J (1990) Effects of food and predation on behavior of prairie voles—a field experiment. Oikos 58:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dill LM (1990) Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae. Environ Biol Fishes 27:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dill LM, Houtman R (1989) The influence of distance of refuge on flight initiation distance in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Can J Zool 67:233–235Google Scholar
  15. Driver PM, Humphries DA (1988) Protean behavior: the biology of unpredictability. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Edut E, Eilam D (2004) Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns. Behav Brain Res 155:207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eilam D (1997) Postnatal development of body architecture and gait in several rodent species. J Exp Biol 200:1339–1350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eilam D (2005) Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense—implications for the control of defensive behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1181–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erlinge S, Bergsten B, Kristiansson H (1974) The stoat and its prey-hunting behaviour and fugitive reactions. Fauna Flora 69:203–211Google Scholar
  20. Farina RA, Blanco RE, Christiansen P (2005) Swerving as the escape strategy of Macrauchenia patachonica Owen (Mammalia; Litopterna). Ameghiniana 42:751–760Google Scholar
  21. Furuichi N (2002) Dynamics between a predator and a prey switching two kinds of escape motions. J Theor Biol 217:159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham RR (1934) The silent flight of owls. J R Aeronaut Soc 38:837–843Google Scholar
  23. Hendrie CA, Weiss SM (1994) The development of an animal model of panic with predictive and face validity. In: Cooper SJ, Hendrie CA (eds) Ethology and pharmacology. Wiley, Chichester, England, pp 111–132Google Scholar
  24. Hendrie CA, Weiss SM, Eilam D (1998) Behavioural response of wild rodents to the calls of an owl: a comparative study. J Zool 245:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howland HC (1974) Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: The relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability. J Theor Biol 47:333–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huntingford FA (1984) Some ethical issues raised by studies of predation and aggression. Anim Behav 32:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jedrzejewski W, Jedrzejewska B, Szymura A, Zub K (1996) Tawny owl (Strix aluco) predation in a pristine deciduous forest (Bialowieza National Park, Poland). J Anim Ecol 65:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jedrzejewski W, Rychlik L, Jedrzejewska B (1993) Responses of bank voles to odours of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural predator–vole relationship. Oikos 68:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaufman DW (1974) Differential predation on active and inactive prey by barn owls. Auk 91:172–173Google Scholar
  30. Kenward RE (1978) Hawks and doves: factors affecting success and selection in goshawk attacks on woodpigeons. J Anim Ecol 47:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King CM (1985) Interactions between woodland rodents and their predators. Symp Zool Soc Lond 55:219–247Google Scholar
  32. Kramer DL, Bonenfant M (1997) Direction of predator approach and the decision to flee to a refuge. Anim Behav 54:289–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T (1999) The dietary basis for temporal partitioning: food habits of coexisting Acomys species. Oecologia 121:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kullberg C, Jackobsson S, Fransso T (2000) High migratory fuel impair predator evasion in sedge warblers. Auk 117:1034–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lima SL (1993) Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on escape from predator attacks: a survey of North American birds. Wilson Bull 105:1–215Google Scholar
  36. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation—a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640Google Scholar
  37. Lind J, Fransson T, Jakobsson S, Kullberg C (1999) Reduced take-off ability in robins (Erithacus rubecula) due to migratory fuel load. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lind J, Hollen L, Smedberg E, Svensson U, Vallin A, Jakobsson S (2003) Detection distance influences escape behaviour in two parids, Parus major and P. caeruleus. J Avian Biol 34:233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lind J, Kaby U, Jakobsson S (2002) Split-second escape decisions in blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Naturwissenschaften 89:420–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lingle S, Pellis SM (2002) Fight or flight? Antipredator behavior and the escalation of coyote encounters with deer. Oecologia 131:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin G, Busby J (1990) Birds by night. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Mikkola H (1983) Owls of Europe. Poyser, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  43. Oron U, Maltz L, Shefer G, Eilam D (1998) Histology and enzymatic activity in the postnatal development of limb muscles in rodents. Physiol Behav 63:651–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Payne RS (1971) Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). J Exp Biol 54:535–573PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Ronkainen H, Ylonen H (1994) Behavior of cyclic bank voles under risk of mustelid predation—do females avoid copulations? Oecologia 97:377–381Google Scholar
  46. Scarratt AM, Godin JGJ (1992) Foraging and antipredator decisions in the hermit crab Pagurus acadianus (Benedict). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 156:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Selaas V (1993) A comparison of the diet of sympatric owls in Aust-Agder country, Southern Norway. Fauna Norv 26:7–13Google Scholar
  48. Shargal E, Kronfeld-Schor N, Dayan T (2000) Population biology and spatial relationships of coexisting spiny mice (Acomys) in Israel. J Mammal 81:1046–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shifferman E, Eilam D (2004) Movement and direction of movement of a simulated prey affect the success rate in barn owl Tyto alba attack. J Avian Biol 35:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shkolnik A (1971) Diurnal activity in a small desert rodent. Int J Biometeorol 15:115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith WP (1991) Ontogeny and adaptiveness of tail flagging behavior in white-tailed deer. Am Nat 138:190–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thorpe WH, Griffin DR (1962) The lack of ultrasonic component in the flight noise of owls compared with other birds. Ibis 104:256–257Google Scholar
  53. Tome D (1994) Diet composition of the long-eared owl in center Slovenia: seasonal variations in prey use. J Raptor Res 28:253–258Google Scholar
  54. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyTel-Aviv UniversityRamat-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations