Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 457–468 | Cite as

Do yellow-bellied marmots respond to predator vocalizations?

  • Daniel T. Blumstein
  • Louise Cooley
  • Jamie Winternitz
  • Janice C. Daniel
Original Paper

Abstract

We conducted four experiments to determine whether yellow-bellied marmots, Marmota flaviventris, discriminate among predator vocalizations, and if so, whether the recognition mechanism is learned or experience-independent. First, we broadcast to marmots the social sounds of coyotes, Canis latrans, wolves, Canis lupus, and golden eagles, Aquila chrysaetos, as well as conspecific alarm calls. Coyotes and eagles are extant predators at our study site, while wolves have been absent since the mid-1930s. In three follow-up experiments, we reversed the eagle call and presented marmots with forward and reverse calls to control for response to general properties of call structure rather than those specifically associated with eagles, we tested for novelty by comparing responses to familiar and unfamiliar birds, and we tested for the duration of predator sounds by comparing a wolf howl (that was much longer than the coyote in the first experiment) with a long coyote howl of equal duration to the original wolf. Marmots suppressed foraging and increased looking most after presentation of the conspecific alarm call and least after that of the coyote in the first experiment, with moderate responses to wolf and eagle calls. Marmots responded more to the forward eagle call than the reverse call, a finding consistent with a recognition template. Marmots did not differentiate vocalizations from the novel and familiar birds, suggesting that novelty itself did not explain our results. Furthermore, marmots did not differentiate between a wolf howl and a coyote howl of equal duration, suggesting that the duration of the vocalizations played a role in the marmots’ response. Our results show that marmots may respond to predators based solely on acoustic stimuli. The response to currently novel wolf calls suggests that they have an experience-independent ability to identify certain predators acoustically. Marmots’ response to predator vocalizations is not unexpected because 25 of 30 species in which acoustic predator discrimination has been studied have a demonstrated ability to respond selectively to cues from their predators.

Keywords

Acoustic predator recognition Predation risk assessment Yellow-bellied marmots 

References

  1. Abramsky Z, Strauss E, Subach A, Kotler BP, Riechman A (1996) The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and microhabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum. Oecologia 105:313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage KB (1982) Yellow-bellied marmot. In: Davis DE (ed) CRC handbook of census methods for terrestrial vertebrates. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 148–149Google Scholar
  3. Berger J (1998) Future prey: some consequences of the loss and restoration of large carnivores. In: Caro TM (ed) Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 80–100Google Scholar
  4. Berger J, Swenson JE, Persson I-L (2001) Recolonizing carnivores and naive prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 291:1036–1039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumstein DT (1999) The evolution of functionally referential alarm communication: multiple adaptations; multiple constraints. Evol Commun 3:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumstein DT (2006) The ‘multi-predator’ hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behaviour. Ethology 112:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blumstein DT, Armitage KB (1997) Alarm calling in yellow-bellied marmots: I. The meaning of situationally-specific calls. Anim Behav 53:143–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Griffin AS, Evans CS (2000a) Insular tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) respond to visual but not acoustic cues from predators. Behav Ecol 11:528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumstein DT, Evans CS, Daniel JC (2000b) JWatcher 0.9. An introductory user’s guide. http://www.jwatcher.ucla.edu
  10. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC, Schnell MR, Ardron JG, Evans CS (2002) Anipredator behaviour of red-necked pademelons: a factor contributing to species survival? Anim Conserv 5:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouskila A, Blumstein DT (1992) Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment: predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat 139:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bshary R, Noe R (1997) Anti-predation behaviour of red colobus monkeys in the presence of chimpanzees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caro T (2005) Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Charif RA, Mitchell S, Clark CW (1995) Canary 1.2 user’s manual. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1990) How monkeys see the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Colorado Division of Wildlife (2004) Species conservation: gray wolf management. http://www.wildlife.state.co.us/species_cons/graywolf/index.asp
  18. Coss RG (1999) Effects of relaxed natural selection on the evolution of behavior. In: Foster SA, Endler JA (eds) Geographic variation in behavior: perspectives on evolutionary mechanisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 180–208Google Scholar
  19. Crafford D, Ferguson J, Kemp A (1999) Why do grass owls (Tyto capensis) produce clicking calls? Raptor Res 33:134–142Google Scholar
  20. Deecke VB, Slater PJB, Ford JKB (2002) Selective habituation shapes acoustic predator recognition in harbour seals. Nature 420:171–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durant SM (2000) Living with the enemy: avoidance of hyenas and lions by cheetahs in the Serengeti. Behav Ecol 11:624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eilam D, Dayan T, Ben-Eliyahu S, Schulman I, Shefer G, Hendrie CA (1999) Differential behavioural and hormonal responses of voles and spiny mice to owl calls. Anim Behav 58:1085–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elliott D (2004) Yellowstone wolf found dead near Denver. Casper Star Tribune, Casper, WYGoogle Scholar
  24. Gebo DL, Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Lambert J (1994) Locomotor response to predator threat in red-colobus monkeys. Primates 35:219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gil-da-costa R, Palleroni A, Hauser MD, Touchton J, Kelley JP (2003) Rapid acquisition of an alarm response by a neotropical primate to a newly introduced avian predator. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:605–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffin AS, Blumstein DT, Evans CS (2000) Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conserv Biol 14:1317–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffin AS, Evans CS, Blumstein DT (2001) Learning specificity in acquired predator recognition. Anim Behav 62:577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gursky S (2002) Determinants of gregariousness in the spectral tarsier (Prosimian: Tarsius spectrum). J Zool Lond 256:401–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gursky S (2003) Predation experiments on infant spectral tarsiers (Tarsius spectrum). Folia Primatol 74:272–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hauser MD, Caffrey C (1994) Anti-predator response to raptor calls in wild crows, Corvus brachyrhynchos hesperis. Anim Behav 48:1469–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (1990) Recognition of predator and competitor calls in non-human primates and birds: a preliminary report. Ethology 86:116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hendrie CA, Weiss SM, Eilam D (1998) Behavioural response of wild rodents to the calls of an owl: a comparative study. J Zool Lond 245:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones ME, Smith GC, Jones SM (2004) Is anti-predator behaviour in Tasmanian eastern quolls (Dasyurus viverrinus) effective against introduced predators? Anim Conserv 7:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karpanty SM, Grella R (2001) Lemur responses to diurnal raptor calls in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Folia Primatol 72:100–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelley JL, Magurran AE (2003) Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish Fish 5:216–226Google Scholar
  36. Keppel GL (1991) Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  37. Kristensen EA, Closs GP (2004) Anti-predator response of naive and experienced common bully to chemical alarm cues. J Fish Biol 64:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Macedonia JM, Yount PL (1991) Auditory assessment of avian predator threat in semi-captive ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Primates 32:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Macromedia (1995) SoundEdit 16. Macromedia, Inc., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  41. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2001) MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.03. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenna MC, Bell SK (1997) Classification of mammals above the species level. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Noë R, Bshary R (1997) The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petrzelkova K, Zukal J (2001) Emergence behaviour of the serotine bat (Eptesicus serotinus) under predation risk. Neth J Zool 51:395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pusenius J, Ostfeld RS (2000) Effects of stoat’s presence and auditory cues indicating its presence on tree seedling predation by meadow voles. Oikos 91:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pyare S, Cain S, Moody D, Schwartz C, Berger J (2004) Carnivore re-colonisation: reality, possibility and a non-equilibrium century for grizzly bears in the southern Yellowstone ecosystem. Anim Conserv 7:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rainey HJ, Zuberbühler K, Slater PJB (2004) Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:755–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Searcy YM, Caine NG (2003) Hawk calls elicit alarm and defensive reactions in captive Geoffroy’s Marmosets (Callithrix geoffroyi). Folia Primatologica 74:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart D (2000) Australian bird calls favourites. Nature Sound, Mullumbimby, NSWGoogle Scholar
  50. SPSS, Inc. (2002) SPSS-11 for the Macintosh. SPSS Inc., Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  51. Swaisgood RR, Rowe MP, Owings DH (1999) Assessment of rattlesnake dangerousness by California ground squirrels: exploitation of cues from rattling sounds. Anim Behav 57:1301–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treves A (1999) Has predation shaped the social systems of arboreal primates? Int J Primatol 20:35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Vuren D (2001) Predation on yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris). Am Midl Nat 145:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warren ER (1942) The mammals of Colorado: their habits and distribution, 2 edn. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson DE, Reeder DM (1993) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Zuberbühler K (2000) Causal knowledge of predators’ behaviour in wild Diana monkeys. Anim Behav 59:209–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuberbühler K (2001) Predator-specific alarm calls in Campbell’s monkeys, Cercopithecus campbelli. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:414–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zuberbühler K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1999) Conceptual semantics in a nonhuman primate. J Comp Psychol 113:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel T. Blumstein
    • 1
  • Louise Cooley
    • 2
  • Jamie Winternitz
    • 1
  • Janice C. Daniel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.The Rocky Mountain Biological LaboratoryCrested ButteUSA

Personalised recommendations