Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 439–445

UV wavelengths make female three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) more attractive for males

Original Paper


Numerous fishes possess UV vision and show UV patterns, which often play a role in social communication, especially during courtship. UV light is scattered strongly in water and thus might be used for intra-specific close-range communication without being detected by predators. In addition to the red-belly colouration and blue-coloured iris, male three-spined sticklebacks possess UV reflectance on their skin, and females prefer males presented with UV light rather than without. To investigate whether UV also influences male visual preference for females in this species, we used a dichotomous mate choice design in which one female could be viewed by a male in two visual conditions. Courting male sticklebacks preferred females that were presented in full-spectrum conditions including UV to the same females presented in conditions lacking this light component. Furthermore, control trials with neutral-density filters indicated that male preference in the UV treatment was not affected by a difference in achromatic brightness between the UV+ and UV− stimuli. Reflectance measurements of gravid females suggest an enhanced UV contrast between the dark bar pattern, which is characteristic of gravid females, and silvery body parts.


Male choice Spectral reflectance Stickleback UV vision 


  1. Alonso-Alvarez C, Doutrelant C, Sorci G (2004) Ultraviolet reflectance affects male-male interactions in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus ultramarinus). Behav Ecol 15:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundsen T (2000) Female ornaments: Genetically correlated or sexually selected? In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Academic, Trondheim, Norway, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  3. Andersson S, Amundsen T (1997) Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1587–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker JA (1994) Life history variation in female threespine stickleback. In: Bell MA, Foster SA (eds) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford Scientific, Oxford, England p 145–187Google Scholar
  5. Bakker TCM, Rowland WJ (1995) Male mating preference in sticklebacks: effects of repeated testing and own attractiveness. Behaviour 132:935–949Google Scholar
  6. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Maier EJ (1996) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature 380:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Lunau K (1997) Ultraviolet plumage colours predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:8618–8621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulcott PD, Walton K, Braithwaite VA (2005) The role of ultraviolet wavelengths in the mate-choice decisions of female three-spined sticklebacks. J Exp Biol 208:1453–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dosen L, Montgomerie R (2004) Female size influences mate preferences for male guppies. Ethology 110:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endler JA (1993a) Some general-comments on the evolution and design of animal communication-systems. Philos Trans R Soc B 340:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FitzGerald GJ, Whoriskey FG (1992) Empirical studies of cannibalism in fish. In: Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (eds) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 238–255Google Scholar
  13. Herdman EJE, Kelly CD, Godin JGJ (2004) Male mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): do males prefer larger females as mates? Ethology 110:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC (1999) Preference for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Anim Behav 58:809–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobs G (1981) Comparative color vision. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM (1998) Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: attractive males choose big females, which lay big eggs. Anim Behav 56:859–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. LeBas NR, Marshall NJ (2000) The role of colour in signalling and male choice in the agamid lizard Ctenophorus ornatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macias Garcia C, Burt de Perera T (2002) UV-based female preference in a viviparous fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLennan DA, McPhail JD (1990) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): the relationship between male colour and female behaviour. Can J Zool 68:482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milinski M, Griffiths S, Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Hass-Assenbaum A, Boehm T (2005) Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4414–4418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Modarressie R, Rick IP, Bakker TCM (2006) UV matters in shoaling decisions. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:849–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ojanguren AF, Magurran AE (2004) Uncoupling the links between male mating tactics and female attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:427–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pelabon C, Borg AA, Bjelvenmark J, Forsgren E, Barber I, Amundsen T (2003) Do male two-spotted gobies prefer large fecund females? Behav Ecol 14:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plath M, Seggel U, Burmeister H, Heubel KU, Schlupp I (2006) Choosy males from the underground: Male mate choice in surface- and cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana (Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Naturwissenschaften 93:103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reznick DN, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker TCM (2004) Male three-spined sticklebacks reflect in ultraviolet light. Behaviour 141:1531–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rick IP, Modarressie R, Bakker TCM (2006) UV wavelengths affect female mate choice in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim Behav 71:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rowe MP, Baube CL, Loew ER, Phillips JB (2004) Optimal mechanisms for finding and selecting mates: how threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) should encode male throat colors. J Comp Physiol A 190:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowland WJ (1989) Mate choice and supernormality effect in female sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowland WJ (1995) Do Female stickleback care about male courtship vigour? Manipulation of display tempo using video playback. Behaviour 132:951–961Google Scholar
  31. Rowland WJ, Baube C, Horan T (1991) Signalling of sexual receptivity by female sticklebacks. Anim Behav 42:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sevenster-Bol ACA (1962) On the causation of drive reduction after a consummatory act. Archiv Néerland Zool 15:175–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siebeck UE (2004) Communication in coral reef fish: the role of ultraviolet colour patterns in damselfish territorial behaviour. Anim Behav 68:273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith EJ, Partridge JC, Parsons KN, White EM, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Church SC (2002) Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol 13:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stapley J, Whiting MJ (2006) Ultraviolet signals fighting ability in a lizard. Biol Lett 2:169–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wootton RJ (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Zbinden M, Largiadér CR, Bakker TCM (2001) Sperm allocation in the three-spined stickleback. J Fish Biol 59:1287–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Evolutionsbiologie und ÖkologieUniversity of BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations