Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 15–27

Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications

Review

Abstract

Social network theory has made major contributions to our understanding of human social organisation but has found relatively little application in the field of animal behaviour. In this review, we identify several broad research areas where the networks approach could greatly enhance our understanding of social patterns and processes in animals. The network theory provides a quantitative framework that can be used to characterise social structure both at the level of the individual and the population. These novel quantitative variables may provide a new tool in addressing key questions in behavioural ecology particularly in relation to the evolution of social organisation and the impact of social structure on evolutionary processes. For example, network measures could be used to compare social networks of different species or populations making full use of the comparative approach. However, the networks approach can in principle go beyond identifying structural patterns and also can help with the understanding of processes within animal populations such as disease transmission and information transfer. Finally, understanding the pattern of interactions in the network (i.e. who is connected to whom) can also shed some light on the evolution of behavioural strategies.

Keywords

Social networks Social organisation Mate choice Disease transmission Information transfer Cooperation 

References

  1. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman CM, Rasmussen KLR, Suomi SJ (1997) Group size, infant development and social networks in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 53:405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezanson M, Garber PA, Rutherford J, Cleveland A (2002) Patterns of subgrouping, social affiliation and social networks in Nicaraguan mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata). Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 34:44Google Scholar
  4. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows, version 6: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen JT, Laroe C (2006) Airline networks and the international diffusion of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Geogr J 172:130–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley BJ, Doran-Sheehy DM, Lukas D, Boesch C, Vigilant L (2004) Dispersed male networks in western gorillas. Curr Biol 14:510–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brashares JS, Garland T Jr, Arcese P (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behavior, diet, and body size in the African antelope. Behav Ecol 11:452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown C, Laland KN, Krause J (eds) (2006) Fish cognition and behavior. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Chepko-Sade BD, Reitz KP, Sade DS (1989) Sociometrics of Macaca mulatto IV: network analysis of social structure of a pre-fission group. Soc Netw 11:293–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corr J (2001) Changes in social networks over the lifespan in male and female rhesus macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 32:54–55Google Scholar
  12. Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc Lond B 271:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Croft DP, James R, Ward AJW, Botham MS, Mawdsley D, Krause J (2005) Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia 143:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Croft DP, James R, Thomas P, Hathaway C, Mawdsley D, Laland KN, Krause J (2006) Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2007) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton Univ. Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Crook JH (1964) The evolution of social organisation and visual communication in the weaver birds (Ploceinae). Behaviour Suppl 10:1–178Google Scholar
  17. Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM (2004) Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 41:879–892Google Scholar
  18. Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Getz WM (2005) Disentangling association patterns in fission-fusion societies using African buffalo as an example. Anim Behav 69:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deputte BL, Quris R (1997) Socialization processes in primates: use of multivariate analyses.2. Influence of sex on social development of captive rhesus monkeys. Behav Processes 40:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Waal FBM (1996) Macaque social culture: development and perpetuation of affiliative networks. J Comp Psychol 110:147–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12917–12922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durrell JL, Sneddon IA, O’Connell NE, Whitehead H (2004) Do pigs form preferential associations? Appl Anim Behav Sci 89:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faust K (2006) Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodol Zv 3:185–216Google Scholar
  24. Faust K, Skvoretz J (2002) Comparing networks across space and time, size and species. Sociol Method 32:267–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fewell JH (2003) Social insect networks. Science 301:1867–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Granovetter M (1974) Getting a job. Harvard Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Janik VM, Sayigh LS, Wells RS (2006) Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8293–8297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarman PJ (1974) The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–267Google Scholar
  31. Klovdahl AS (1985) Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med 21:1203–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Know KL, Sade DS (1991) Social-behavior of the emperor tamarind in captivity—components of agonistic display and the agonistic network. Int J Primatol 12:439–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Krause J, Butlin R, Peuhkuri N, Pritchard VL (2000) The social organisation of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field. Biol Rev 75:477–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kudo H, Dunbar RIM (2001) Neocortex size and social network size in primates. Anim Behav 62:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laughlin SB, Sejnowski TJ (2003) Communication in neuronal networks. Science 301:1870–1874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:186–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lusseau D, Newman MEJ (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:477–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lusseau D, Wilson B, Hammond PS, Greller K, Durban JW, Parsons KM, Barton TR, Thompson PM (2005) Quantifying the influence of sociality on population structure in bottlenose dolphins. J Anim Ecol 75:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. McGregor PK (ed) (2005) Animal communication networks. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Michelena P, Henric K, Angibault JM, Gautrais J, Lapeyronie P, Porter RH, Deneubourg JL, Bon R (2005) An experimental study of social attraction and spacing between the sexes in sheep. J Exp Biol 208:4419–4426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakamichi M, Koyama N (2000) Intra-troop affiliative relationships of females with newborn infants in wild ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Am J Primatol 50:187–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman MEJ (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. Eur Phys J B 38:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441:502–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pastor-Nieto R (2001) Grooming, kinship, and co-feeding in captive spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Zoo Biol 20:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Rothenberg RB, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Green DL, Taylor JE, Bonney MS, White HA (2002) Sexual network structure as an indicator of epidemic phase. Sex Transm Infect 78:152–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Rothenberg R, Kimbrough L, Lewis-Hardy R, Heath B, Williams OC, Tambe P, Johnson D, Schrader M (2000) Social network methods for endemic foci of syphilis—a pilot project. Sex Transm Dis 27:12–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott J (2000) Social network analysis. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen P, Dasgupta S, Chatterjee A, Sreeram PA, Mukherjee G, Manna SS (2003) Small-world properties of the Indian railway network. Phys Rev E 67:036106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson JC, Ziemba RE (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q Rev Biol 79:241–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Skyrms B, Permantle R (2000) A dynamic model of social network formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sole RV, Montoya JM (2001) Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc R Lond Soc B 268:2039–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stoinski TS, Hoff MP, Maple TL (2003) Proximity patterns of female western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) during the six months after parturition. Am J Primatol 61:61–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strier KB, Dib LT, Figueira JEC (2002) Social dynamics of male muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides hypoxanthus). Behaviour 139:315–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sundaresan SR, Fischhoff IR, Dushoff J, Rubenstein DI (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission–fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager. Oecologia 151:140–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sutherland WJ (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  60. Tadic B (2001) Dynamics of directed graphs: the World-Wide Web. Physica A 293:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas POR, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Davis A, Faria JJ, Dyer JRG, Piyapong C, Ramnarine I, Ruxton GD, Krause J (2007) Does defection during predator inspection affect social structure in wild shoals of guppies? Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  62. Valente TW (1995) Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Hampton, Creskill, NJGoogle Scholar
  63. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Webb CR (2005) Farm animal networks: unraveling the contact structure of the British sheep population. Prev Vet Med 68:3–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  66. Wittemyer G, Douglas-Hamilton I, Getz WM (2005) The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Anim Behav 69:1357–1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: Unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Integrative and Comparative BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.College of Natural Sciences, School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Wales BangorBangorUK
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations