Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 10, pp 1515–1521 | Cite as

Temporal constraints and female preference for burrow width in the fiddler crab, Uca mjoebergi

Original Paper


We studied sampling behaviour and mate choice in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi. Once a female selects a mate, she copulates in his burrow and remains there until releasing her aquatic larvae. U. mjoebergi occurs in habitats that are inundated only by the highest amplitude spring tides. Females can only release their larvae during these tides, and release before or after will result in complete failure of reproductive effort. Matings occur over a 5-day period near the end of neap tides. Our results suggest that within the mating period, females adjust their larval developmental rates by selecting specific burrows in which to incubate their clutches. We found that at the start of the mating period, females chose larger males as mates. Since male size was positively correlated to burrow width, females were selecting wide burrows and effectively incubating at lower temperatures. This would slow down the developmental rates of larvae. In contrast, females that mated late in the mating period selectively chose small males. By incubating in narrower, warmer burrows, these females may increase the developmental rates of larvae. We propose that females are selecting burrows to influence incubation rate and ensure timely release of their larvae. Female U. mjoebergi appear to adjust their preference for the direct benefits of mate choice to increase their reproductive success.


Female mate choice Temporal constraints Burrow width Development time Fiddler crab 



Many thanks to Nicolas Telford for his invaluable assistance in the field, and Michael Jennions for statistical help. We also thank Catherine deRivera, John Christy, Stuart Cooney and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript.


  1. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1996) Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH, Passmore NI (1999) Female choice in the synchronously waving fiddler crab Uca annulipes. Ethology 105:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briere JF, Pracros P, Le Roux AY, Pierre JS (1999) A novel rate model of temperature-dependent development for arthropods. Environ Entomol 28:22–29Google Scholar
  4. Christy JH (1978) Adaptive significance of reproductive cycles in fiddler crab Uca pugilator—a hypothesis. Science 199:453–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Christy JH (1983) Female choice in the resource-defense mating system of the sand fiddler crab, Uca pugilator. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christy JH (1987) Female choice and the breeding behavior of the fiddler crab Uca beebei. J Crustac Biol 7:624–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christy JH (2003) Reproductive timing and larval dispersal of intertidal crabs: the predator avoidance hypothesis. Rev Chil Hist Nat 76:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. deRivera CE (2005) Long searches for male-defended breeding burrows allow female fiddler crabs, Uca crenulata, to release larvae on time. Anim Behav 70:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2003) Optimal assessment of multiple cues. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1637–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Georges A, Beggs K, Young JE, Doody JS (2005) Modelling development of reptile embryos under fluctuating temperature regimes. Physiol Biochem Zool 78:18–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson RM, Langen TA (1996) How do animals choose their mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:468–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godin J-GJ, Briggs SE (1996) Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy. Anim Behav 51:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong A, Gibson RM (1996) Reversal of a female preference after visual exposure to a predator in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 52:1007–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goshima S, Koga T, Murai M (1996) Mate acceptance and guarding by male fiddler crabs Uca tetragonon (Herbst). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 196:131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagstrum DW, Milliken GA (1991) Modeling differences in insect development times between constant and fluctuating temperatures. Ann Entomol Soc Am 84:369–379Google Scholar
  16. Halliday TR (1983) The study of mating choice. In: Bateman P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge, Cambridge, pp 3–52Google Scholar
  17. Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (1996) Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 57:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luttbeg B, Towner MC, Wandesforde-Smith A, Mangel M, Foster SA (2001) State-dependent mate-assessment and mate-selection behavior in female threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus, Gasterosteiformes: Gasterosteidae). Ethology 107:545–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynch KS, Rand AS, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) Plasticity in female mate choice associated with changing reproductive states. Anim Behav 69:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1992) Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 250:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection. Naturwissenschaften 88:401–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan SG, Christy JH (1995) Adaptive significance of the timing of larval release by crabs. Am Nat 145:457–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan SG, Christy JH (1997) Planktivorous fishes as selective agents for reproductive synchrony. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 209:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moriyasu M, Lanteigne C (1998) Embryo development and reproductive cycle in the snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio (Crustacea: Majidae), in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Can J Zool 76:2040–2048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Real L (1990) Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reynolds JD, Jones JC (1999) Female preference for preferred males is reversed under low oxygen conditions in the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps). Behav Ecol 10:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson PJ, Arnqvist G, Stallmann RR (1998) Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am Nat 151:46–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wittenberger JF (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In: Bateman P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 435–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Botany and ZoologyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations