Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1075–1079 | Cite as

Olfactory cues, genetic relatedness and female mate choice in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis)

  • Marissa L. Parrott
  • Simon J. Ward
  • Peter D. Temple-Smith
Original Paper

Abstract

Females show mate preferences for males that are genetically dissimilar to themselves in a variety of taxa, but how females choose these males is not clearly understood. In this study, we examined the effects of olfactory stimuli and genetic relatedness on female mate choice in a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis), during two breeding seasons. Captive female antechinus in oestrus were provided with a combination of male urine and body scent from two novel males, one more genetically similar and one more dissimilar to the females, in a Y-maze olfactometer. Genetic relatedness between females and pairs of males was determined using highly polymorphic, species-specific, microsatellite markers. Females consistently chose to visit the scents of males that were genetically dissimilar to themselves first, spent significantly more time near the source of those scents and showed more sexual and non-exploratory behaviours near those scents. These data demonstrate that chemosensory cues are important in mate choice in the agile antechinus and that females prefer males that are genetically dissimilar to themselves.

Keywords

Mate choice Olfactory cues Genetic relatedness Antechinus agilis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a Melbourne Research PhD Scholarship, grants from the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment and Winifred Violet Scott Estate, a Loftus–Hills Memorial Fund Award and David Hay Postgraduate Writing-up Award to M. Parrott. We thank Lynne Selwood and Mark Elgar for their valuable advice and comments on the manuscript. This research adhered to the Animal Behaviour Society Guidelines for the use of animals and was carried out with ethics approval from the Animal Ethics Sub-Committee at the University of Melbourne and under the Department of Sustainability and Environment Wildlife permits.

References

  1. Aeschlimann PB, Haberli MA, Reusch TBH, Boehm T, Milinski M (2003) Female sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus use self-reference to optimise MHC allele number during mate selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:119–126Google Scholar
  2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks SC, Finlayson GR, Lawson SJ, Lindenmayer DB, Paetkau D, Ward SJ, Taylor AC (2005) The effects of habitat fragmentation due to forestry plantation establishment on the demography and genetic variation of a marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Biol Conserv 122:581–597, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson PPG (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley AJ, McDonald IR, Lee AK (1980) Stress and mortality in a small marsupial (Antechinus stuartii, Macleay). Gen Comp Endocrinol 40:188–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite RW (1974) Behavioural changes associated with the population cycle of Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia). Aust J Zool 22:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braithwaite RW, Lee AK (1979) A mammalian example of semelparity. Am Nat 113:151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cockburn A, Scott MP, Scotts DJ (1985) Inbreeding avoidance and male-biased natal dispersion in Antechinus spp. (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae). Anim Behav 33:908–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickman CR, Parnaby HE, Crowther MS, King DH (1998) Antechinus agilis (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae), a new species from the A. stuartii complex in south eastern Australia. Aust J Zool 46:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Holmes CM (2000) Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim Behav 59:371–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Ward SJ, Temple-Smith PD (2002a) Multiple paternity in a field population of a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:84–91, DOI 10.1007/s00265-002-0485-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Ward SJ, Temple-Smith PD, Paetkau D (2002b) Factors influencing paternity success in Antechinus agilis: last-male sperm precedence, timing of mating and genetic compatibility. J Evol Biol 15:100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landry C, Garant D, Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2001) ‘Good genes as heterozygosity’: the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1279–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lazenby-Cohen KA, Cockburn A (1988) Lek promiscuity in a semelparous mammal, Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia, Dasyuridae)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mays HL, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. TREE 19:554–559, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.018 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2005) Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molec Ecol 14:19–38, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02395.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsson M, Madsen T, Nordby J, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Wittsell H (2003) Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S254–S256Google Scholar
  19. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK (1991) Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352:619–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49:1280–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salamon M (1994) Seasonal, sexual and dietary induced variations in the sternal scent secretion in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Adv Biosc 93:211–222Google Scholar
  23. Salamon M, Davies NW (1998) Identification and variation of volatile compounds in sternal gland secretions of male koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Chem Ecol 24:1659–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Selwood L (1982) Brown antechinus Antechinus stuartii: management of breeding colonies to obtain embryonic material and pouch young. In: Evans DD (ed) The management of Australian mammals in captivity. Zoological Board of Victoria, Melbourne, pp 31–36Google Scholar
  25. Shimmin GA, Taggart DA, Temple-Smith PD (2000) Sperm competition and genetic diversity in the agile antechinus (Dasyuridae: Antechinus agilis). J Zool 252:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SYSTAT (2004) SYSTAT for Windows, statistics, version 11 edn. SYSTAT, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  27. Toftegaard CL, Bradley AJ (2003) Chemical communication in dasyurid marsupials. In: Jones M, Dickman C, Archer M (eds) Predators with pouches. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 347–357Google Scholar
  28. Toftegaard CL, McMahon KL, Galloway GL, Bradley AJ (2002) Processing of urinary pheromones in Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae): functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. J Mammal 83:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Molec Ecol 9:1013–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wedekind C, Füri S (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simple heterozygosity? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Kalbe M (2003) Multiple parasites are driving major histocompatibility complex polymorphism in the wild. J Evol Biol 16:224–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol 34:365–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Mike V, Thaler HT, Mathieson BJ, Abbott J, Boyse J, Zayas ZA, Thomas L (1976) Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med 144:1324–1335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zabaras R, Richardson BJ, Wyllie SG (2005) Evolution in the suit of semiochemicals secreted by the sternal gland of Australian marsupials. Aust J Zool 53:257–263, DOI 10.1071/ZO04070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marissa L. Parrott
    • 1
  • Simon J. Ward
    • 1
  • Peter D. Temple-Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations