Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1061–1074 | Cite as

Possible causes and consequences of philopatry and breeding dispersal in red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio

  • Gilberto Pasinelli
  • Mathis Müller
  • Michael Schaub
  • Lukas Jenni
Original Paper


Studies of animal breeding dispersal have often focused on possible causes, whereas its adaptive significance has received less attention. Using an information-theoretic approach, we assessed predictions of four hypotheses relating to causes and consequences of breeding dispersal in a migratory passerine, the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio. As predicted by the reproductive performance hypothesis, probability of breeding dispersal in females (though not in males) decreased with increasing annual average number of fledglings produced in the past year, but there was no association with conspecific reproductive performance in either sex. The site choice hypothesis, stating that individuals disperse to improve breeding site quality, received support in males only, as dispersal probability was positively associated to a measure indicating low territory quality. The social constraints hypothesis, referring to dispersal in relation to intraspecific interactions, received little support in either sex. The predation risk hypothesis was hardly supported either. Consequences of dispersal were marginal in both sexes because neither fledgling production in females, nor territory quality in males improved after dispersal. In addition, males settled on territories closer to the forest edge than those occupied predispersal, which is opposite to the prediction of the predation risk hypothesis. We conclude that own reproductive success was the major factor determining dispersal behavior in females, whereas territory quality and possibly predation risk were most important in males. Overall, breeding dispersal appeared not to be adaptive in this dense population inhabiting an optimal habitat.


AIC Reproductive performance Site choice Social constraints Predation risk 


  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csáki F (eds) Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Information Theory. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1991) Territory infidelity in the polygynous great reed warbler acrocephalus arundinaceus—the effect of variation in territory attractiveness. J Anim Ecol 60:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakesley JA, Anderson DR, Noon BR (2006) Breeding dispersal in the California spotted owl. Condor 108:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollinger EK, Gavin TA (1989) The effects of site quality on breeding-site fidelity in bobolinks. Auk 106:584–594Google Scholar
  5. Bollmann K, Reyer H-U, Brodmann PA (1997) Territory quality and reproductive success: can water pipits Anthus spinoletta assess the relationship reliably? Ardea 85:83–98Google Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke AL, Saether BE, Roskaft E (1997) Sex biases in avian dispersal: a reappraisal. Oikos 79:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Danchin E, Heg D, Doligez B (2001) Public information and breeding habitat selection. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 243–258Google Scholar
  10. Danchin E, Giraldeau L-A, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniels SJ, Walters JR (2000) Between-year breeding dispersal in red-cockaded woodpeckers: multiple causes and estimated cost. Ecology 81:2473–2484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobson FS, Jones WT (1985) Multiple causes of dispersal. Am Nat 126:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doligez B, Danchin E, Clobert J, Gustafsson L (1999) The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non-colonial, hole-nesting species, the collared flycatcher. J Anim Ecol 68:1193–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doligez B, Danchin E, Clobert J (2002) Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297:1168–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doligez B, Part T, Danchin E, Clobert J, Gustafsson L (2004) Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher. J Anim Ecol 73:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dow H, Fredga S (1983) Breeding and natal dispersal of the goldeneye Bucephala clangula. J Anim Ecol 52:681–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI Inc (1992–2002) ArcView GIS 3.3. Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Forero MG, Donazar JA, Blas J, Hiraldo F (1999) Causes and consequences of territory change and breeding dispersal distance in the black kite. Ecology 80:1298–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1993) Lanius collurio Linnaeus 1758-Rotrückenwürger, Neuntöter. In: Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (eds) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, vol 13/II (Passeriformes, 4. Teil). Aula, Wiesbaden, pp 1140–1220Google Scholar
  20. Gowaty PA, Plissner JH (1997) Breeding dispersal of eastern bluebirds depends on nesting success but not on removal of old nests: an experimental study. J Field Ornithol 68:323–330Google Scholar
  21. Haas CA (1998) Effects of prior nesting success on site fidelity and breeding dispersal: an experimental approach. Auk 115:929–936Google Scholar
  22. Hakkarainen H, Ilmonen P, Koivunen V, Korpimaki E (2001) Experimental increase of predation risk induces breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owl. Oecologia 126:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoover JP (2003) Decision rules for site fidelity in a migratory bird, the prothonotary warbler. Ecology 84:416–430Google Scholar
  24. Jakober H, Stauber W (1989) Beeinflussen Bruterfolg und Alter die Ortstreue des Neuntöters (Lanius collurio)? Vogelwarte 35:32–36Google Scholar
  25. Jakober H, Stauber W (2002) Warum verstecken Neuntöter (Lanius collurio) ihre Nester nicht besser? J Ornithol 143:397–404Google Scholar
  26. Johnson ML, Gaines MS (1990) Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:449–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Korpimaki E (1993) Does nest-hole quality, poor breeding success or food depletion drive the breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owls? J Anim Ecol 62:606–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leugger-Eggimann U (1997) Parental expenditure of red-backed shrikes Lanius collurio in habitats of varying farming intensity. In: Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät. Universität Basel, Basel, pp 103Google Scholar
  30. Martin TE (1995) Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol Monogr 65:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Montalvo S, Potti J (1992) Breeding dispersal in Spanish pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca. Orn Scand 23:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Müller M, Leugger U (1998) Neuntöter—Pie-grièche écorcheur (Lanius collurio). In: Schmid H, Luder R, Naef-Daenzer B, Graf R, Zbinden N (eds) Schweizer Brutvogelatlas: Verbreitung der Brutvögel in der Schweiz und im Fürstentum Liechtenstein 1993–1996. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, Sempach, pp 468–469Google Scholar
  34. Müller M, Pasinelli G, Schiegg K, Spaar R, Jenni L (2005) Ecological and social effects on reproduction and local recruitment in the red-backed shrike. Oecologia 143:37–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newton I (2001) Causes and consequences of breeding dispersal in the Sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus. Ardea 89:143–154Google Scholar
  36. Newton I, Marquiss M (1982) Fidelity to breeding area and mate in sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus. J Anim Ecol 51:327–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Otter K, Ratcliffe L (1996) Female initiated divorce in a monogamous songbird: Abandoning mates for males of higher quality. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 263:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pärt T, Doligez B (2003) Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:1809–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pärt T, Gustafsson L (1989) Breeding dispersal in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis): possible causes and reproductive consequences. J Anim Ecol 58:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pasinelli G, Walters JR (2002) Social and environmental factors affect natal dispersal and philopatry of male red-cockaded woodpeckers. Ecology 83:2229–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Payne RB, Payne LL (1993) Breeding dispersal in indigo buntings: circumstances and consequences for breeding success and population structure. Condor 95:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pusey AE, Packer C (1987) The evolution of sex-biased dispersal in lions. Behaviour 101:275–310Google Scholar
  43. Roos S (2002) Functional response, seasonal decline and landscape differences in nest predation risk. Oecologia 133:608–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roos S, Pärt T (2004) Nest predators affect spatial dynamics of breeding red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio). J Anim Ecol 73:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS Institute Inc (2002–2003) SAS proprietary software release 9.1.3. Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  46. Sedgwick JA (2004) Site fidelity, territory fidelity, and natal philopatry in willow flycatchers (Empidonax traillii). Auk 121:1103–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sergio F, Newton I (2003) Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J Anim Ecol 72:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Serrano D, Tella JL, Forero MG, Donazar JA (2001) Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues. J Anim Ecol 70:568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Serrano D, Forero MG, Donazar JA, Tella JL (2004) Dispersal and social attraction affect colony selection and dynamics of lesser kestrels. Ecology 85:3438–3447Google Scholar
  50. Simek J (2001) Patterns of breeding fidelity in the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio). Ornis Fenn 78:61–71Google Scholar
  51. Stamps JA (2001) Habitat selection by dispersers: integrating proximate and ultimate approaches. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 230–242Google Scholar
  52. Stanback MT, Rockwell EK (2003) Nest-site fidelity in eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) depends on the quality of alternate cavities. Auk 120:1029–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stenseth NC, Lidicker WZ (1992) Animal dispersal: small mammals as a model. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Switzer PV (1993) Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol Ecol 7:533–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Switzer PV (1997) Past reproductive success affects future habitat selection. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40:307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Travis JMJ, Dytham C (1999) Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 266:723–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tryjanowski P, Kuzniak S, Diehl B (2000) Does breeding performance of red-backed shrike Lanius collurio depend on nest site selection? Ornis Fenn 77:137–141Google Scholar
  58. Valone TJ, Giraldeau L-A (1993) Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? Anim Behav 45:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Waser PMO (1996) Patterns and consequences of dispersal in gregarious carnivores. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 267–295Google Scholar
  61. Yoder JM, Marschall EA, Swanson DA (2004) The cost of dispersal: predation as a function of movement and site familiarity in ruffed grouse. Behav Ecol 15:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilberto Pasinelli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mathis Müller
    • 2
  • Michael Schaub
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lukas Jenni
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Zoology, Ecology GroupUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Ornithological InstituteSempachSwitzerland
  3. 3.Zoological Institute, Division Conservation BiologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations