Chemical mimicry in an incipient leaf-cutting ant social parasite
- 326 Downloads
Some social parasites of insect societies are known to use brute force when usurping a host colony, but most use more subtle forms of chemical cheating either by expressing as few recognition cues as possible to avoid being recognized or by producing similar recognition cues to the host to achieve positive discrimination. The former “chemical insignificance” strategy represents a more general adaptive syndrome than the latter “chemical mimicry” strategy and is expected to be characteristic of early evolutionary stages of social parasitism. We tested this hypothesis by experimentally analyzing the efficiency by which Acromyrmex echinatior leaf-cutting ants recognize intruding workers of the incipient social parasite Acromyrmex insinuator. The results were consistent with the parasite being “chemically insignificant” and not with the “chemical mimicry” hypothesis. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles showed that social parasite workers produce significantly fewer hydrocarbons overall and that their typical profiles have very low amounts of hydrocarbons in the “normal” C29–C35 range but large quantities of unusually heavy C43–C45 hydrocarbons. This suggests that the C29–C35 hydrocarbons are instrumental in normal host nestmate recognition and that the C43–C45 compounds, all of which are dienes and thus more fluid than the corresponding saturated compounds, may reinforce “chemical insignificance” by blurring any remaining variation in recognition cues.
KeywordsAcromyrmex echinatior Acromyrmex insinuator Parasitism Chemical mimicry Dienes
This work was supported by the EU Research-Training Network INSECTS (JJB and ST), by grants from the Danish Natural Science Research Council and the Danish National Research Foundation (JJB), and by a grant from the Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (FRD). Patrizia D’Ettorre and David Nash gave valuable comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
- Alpert GD, Akre RD (1973) Distribution, abundance, and behavior of the inquiline ant Leptothorax diversipilosus. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:753–760Google Scholar
- Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Elmes GW (1978) A morphometric comparison of three closely related species of Myrmica (Formicidae) including a new species from England. Syst Entomol 3:131–145Google Scholar
- Emery C (1909) Über den Ursprung der dulotischen, parasitischen und myrmekophilen Ameisen. Biol Zentbl 29:352–362Google Scholar
- Francoeur A, Loiselle R, Buschinger A (1985) Biosystématique de la tribu Leptothoracini (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). 1. Le genre Formicoxenus dans la région holarctique. Nat Can 112:343–403Google Scholar
- Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (2005) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Lenoir A, Francoeur A, Errard C, Jaisson P (1989) Résultats préliminaires sur le comportement de Formicoxenus provancheri en relation avec son hôte Myrmica incompleta (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Actes Colloques Insectes Sociaux 5:225–232Google Scholar
- Lenoir A, Fresnau D, Errard C, Hefetz A (1999) Individuality and colonial identity in ants: the emergence of the social representation concept. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. pp 219–237Google Scholar
- Lorenzi MC, Bagnères AG, Clément JL (1996) The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in social insects: is it the same in paper-wasps? In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhard MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper wasps. Oxford University Press, London, UK, pp 178–189Google Scholar
- Nelson DR (1993) Methyl-branched lipids in insects. In: Stanley-Samuelson DW, Nelson DR (eds) Insect lipids: chemistry and biology. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp 271–315Google Scholar
- Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar