Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 719–727 | Cite as

Female guppies shorten brood retention in response to predator cues

  • Jonathan P. Evans
  • Clelia Gasparini
  • Andrea Pilastro
Original Article


Predation risk influences the duration of offspring development in many species where embryos develop from externally shed eggs. Surprisingly, such predator-mediated effects on offspring development have rarely been explored in live-bearers. In this paper, we use the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a live-bearing freshwater fish, to test whether the duration of brood retention (the time from mating to parturition) is influenced by experimental changes in the perceived level of predation. Because the swimming performance of female guppies is impaired during late pregnancy, we predicted that females would withhold broods for shorter periods when they are exposed to cues that signal a heightened risk of predation on adults rather than on juveniles. We therefore simulated increased risk of predation on adults by using a combination of pike-shaped models (resembling natural predators that prey on adult guppies) and ‘alarm substances’ derived from the skin extracts of adult conspecific females. Our results revealed that, under simulated predation risk, female guppies produced broods significantly more quickly than their counterparts assigned to a control group where predator cues were absent. A subsequent evaluation of offspring swimming performance revealed a significant positive association between neonate swimming speeds and the duration of brood retention, suggesting that by accelerating parturition, females may produce offspring with impaired locomotor skills. These findings, in conjunction with similar results from other live-bearing species, suggest that the conditions experienced by gestating females can generate significant variation in the timing of offspring development with potentially important implications for offspring fitness.


Phenotypic plasticity Gestation Pregnancy Predator Brood development 



We thank Ferdinando Benatelli for the help with the experiments and Jennifer Kelley and two anonymous referees for comments on a previous draft of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Italian Research Ministry (AP) and the Australian Research Council (JPE). The research conformed to the relevant Italian laws governing the care of animals in research (D.L. 116/27-01-92, C.M.S. 8/22-04-94) and was authorized by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (National Health Institute).


  1. Brown GE (2003) Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fish 4:227–234Google Scholar
  2. Brown GE, Poirier J-F, Adrian JC (2004) Assessment of local predation risk: the role of subthreshold concentrations of chemical alarm cues. Behav Ecol 15:810–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dzikowski R, Hulata G, Harpaz S, Karplus I (2004) Inducible reproductive plasticity of the guppy Poecilia reticulata in response to predation cues. J Exp Zool 301A:776–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans JP, Magurran AE (2000) Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc Natl Acad Sci US Am 97:10074–10076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans JP, Kelley JL, Ramnarine IW, Pilastro A (2002) Female behaviour mediates male courtship under predation risk in the guppy. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans JP, Kelley JL, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A (2004) Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:2035–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghalambor CK, Reznick DN, Walker JA (2004) Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start swimming performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am Nat 164:38–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houde AE (1997) Sex, color, and mate choice in guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Johansson J, Turesson H, Persson A (2004) Active selection for large guppies, Poecilia retiwlata, by the pike cichlid, Crenicichla saxatilis. Oikos 105:595–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Kusch RC, Chivers DP (2004) The effects of crayfish predation on phenotypic and life-history variation in fathead minnows. Can J Zool 82:917–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li DQ (2002) Hatching responses of subsocial spitting spiders to predation risk. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:2155–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lima SL (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Anim Behav 27:215–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640Google Scholar
  16. Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51–66Google Scholar
  17. Magurran AE (2005) Evolutionary Ecology: the Trinidadian guppy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Magurran AE, Girling SL (1986) Predator model recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows. Anim Behav 34:510–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Magurran AE, Seghers BH (1994) Sexual conflict as a consequence of ecology: evidence from guppy, Poecilia reticulata, populations in Trinidad. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 255:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magurran AE, Phillip DAT (2001) Evolutionary implications of large-scale patterns in the ecology of Trinidadian guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Biol J Linn Soc 73:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matthews IM, Magurran AE (2000) Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies. J Fish Biol 56:1381–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mattingly HT, Butler MJ (1994) Laboratory predation on the Trinidadian guppy: implications for the size-selective predation hypothesis and guppy life history evolution. Oikos 69:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirza RS, Chivers DP (2002) Behavioural responses to conspecific disturbance chemicals enhance survival of juvenile brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, during encounters with predators. Behaviour 139:1099–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordell SE (1998) The response of female guppies, Poecilia reticulata, to chemical stimuli from injured conspecifics. Environ Biol Fishes 51:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 363–439Google Scholar
  26. Plaut I (2002) Does pregnancy affect swimming performance of female mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis? Funct Ecol 16:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pocklington R, Dill LM (1995) Predation on female or males: who pays for bright male traits? Anim Behav 49:1122–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reznick DN, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:125–148Google Scholar
  29. Reznick DN, Bryga H, Endler JA (1990) Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346:357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richter SC (2000) Larval caddisfly predation on the eggs and embryos of Rana capito and Rana sphenocephala. J Herpetol 34:590–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saenz D, Johnson JB, Adams CK, Dayton GH (2003) Accelerated hatching of southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala) eggs in response to the presence of a crayfish (Procambarus nigrocinctus) predator. Copeia 646–649Google Scholar
  33. Seghers BH (1974) Geographic variation in the responses of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to aerial predators. Oecologia 14:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaffer LR, Formanowicz DR (1996) A cost of viviparity and parental care in scorpions: reduced sprint speed and behavioural compensation. Anim Behav 51:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shine R (2003) Effects of pregnancy on locomotor performance: an experimental study on lizards. Oecologia 136:450–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shine R, Downes SJ (1999) Can pregnant lizards adjust their offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions? Oecologia 119:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shine R, Olsson M (2003) When to be born? Prolonged pregnancy or incubation enhances locomotor performance in neonatal lizard (Scincidae). J Evol Biol 16:823–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sih A, Moore RD (1993) Delayed hatching of salamander eggs in response to enhanced larval predation risk. Am Nat 142:947–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinervo B, Hedges R, Adolph SC (1991) Decreased sprint speed as a cost of reproduction in the lizard Sceloporus occidentalis—variation among populations. J Exp Biol 155:323–336Google Scholar
  40. Templeton CN, Shriner WM (2004) Multiple selection pressures influence Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) antipredator behavior. Behav Ecol 15:673–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wapstra E (2000) Maternal basking opportunity affects juvenile phenotype in a viviparous lizard. Funct Ecol 14:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warkentin KM (1995) Adaptive plasticity in hatching age—a response to predation risk trade-offs. Proc Natl Acad Sci US Am 92:3507–3510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Webb JK (2004) Pregnancy decreases swimming performance of female northern death adders (Acanthophis praelongus). Copeia 357–363Google Scholar
  44. Wedekind C, Muller R (2005) Risk-induced early hatching in salmonids. Ecology 86:2525–2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wisenden BD, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1995) Early warning in the predation sequence—a disturbance pheromone in Iowa darters (Etheostoma exile). J Chem Ecol 21:1469–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan P. Evans
    • 1
  • Clelia Gasparini
    • 2
  • Andrea Pilastro
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  2. 2.Dipartimento di BiologiaUniversità di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations