Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 669–677 | Cite as

Species-specificity and individual variation in the song of male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii)

Original Article

Abstract

Sequences of the advertisement calls produced by male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii) during the autumn mating period were recorded from individuals at two separate sites in Antrim, Northern Ireland, in August 2004. Several male roosts were found at these sites in close proximity to a single maternity roost, each containing approximately 200 adult females and their young. Analysis of measured parameters of four identified call types revealed that there were significant differences in call structure between sites and between individuals. Playback experiments, performed outside the adult female and juvenile roost sites, comprised of experimental advertisement call sequences of P. nathusii, Pipistrellus pygmaeus and Pipistrellus pipistrellus and control sound recorded without bats present (silence). Response was measured by simultaneously recording ultrasound during playbacks and counting the number of echolocation pulses identified as those of P. nathusii above a predetermined amplitude threshold. Significantly greater numbers of P. nathusii echolocation pulses were recorded during playback of male P. nathusii advertisement calls than during playback of congeners’ advertisement calls and control sound. The number of echolocation pulses recorded was similar during playback of P. pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus advertisement calls and silence. We suggest that, due to call complexity, male P. nathusii advertisement calls should be classified as ‘song’. Species-specificity and individual variation suggests that the songs of male P. nathusii have the potential to play a role in mate attraction and mate assessment.

Keywords

Advertisement call Nathusius’ pipistrelles Call type 

References

  1. Ahlén I (1990) Identification of bats in flight. Swedish Society for the Conservation of Nature and the Swedish Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson S (1994) Costs of sexual advertising in the lekking Jackson’s widowbird. Condor 96:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOU (American Ornithologists’ Union) (1985) Thirty-fifth supplement to the American Ornithologists’ Union check-list of North American birds. Auk 102:680–686Google Scholar
  4. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1990) Suitable approach perches affect female phonotaxis in an arboreal frog. Herpetologica 46:11–14Google Scholar
  5. Backwell PRY, Passmore NI (1991) Advertisement calls and female phonotaxis in Natal dwarf Afrixalus. J Afr Zool 4:275–280Google Scholar
  6. Baker MC, Cunningham MA (1985) The biology of bird-song dialects. Behav Brain Sci 8:85–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barlow KE, Jones G (1996) Pipistrellus nathusii (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Britain in the mating season. J Zool 240:767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barlow KE, Jones G (1997) Differences in song-flight calls and social calls between two phonic types of the vespertilionid bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. J Zool 241:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barratt EM, Deaville R, Burland TM, Bruford MW, Jones G, Racey PA, Wayne RK (1997) DNA answers the call of pipistrelle bat species. Nature 387:138–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker PH (1982) The coding of species-specific characteristics in bird sounds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 213–252Google Scholar
  11. Behr O, von Helversen O (2004) Bat serenades—complex courtship songs of the sac-winged bat (Saccopteryx bilineata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjerke TH, Bjerke TH (1981) Song dialects in the redwing, Turdus iliacus. Ornis Scand 12:40–50Google Scholar
  13. Boughman JW, Wilkinson GS (1998) Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. Anim Behav 55:1717–1732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Catchpole CK (1987) Bird song, sexual selection and female choice. Trends Ecol Evol 2:94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Channing A, Moyer D, Burger M (2002) Cryptic species of sharp-nosed reed frogs in the Hyperolius nasutus complex: advertisement call differences. Afr Zool 21:91–99Google Scholar
  18. Ciechanowski M, Jarzembowski T (2004) The size and number of harems in the polygynous bat Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius, 1839) (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Mamm Biol 69(4):277–280Google Scholar
  19. Clayton NS (1990) Subspecies recognition and song learning in zebra finches. Anim Behav 40:1009–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidson SM, Wilkinson GS (2002) Geographic and individual variation in vocalizations by male Saccopteryx bilineata (Chiroptera: Emballonuridae). J Mamm 83:526–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson S, Wilkinson GS (2004) Function of male song in the greater white-lined bat, Saccopteryx bilineata. Anim Behav 67:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falls JB, d’Agincourt LG (1982) Why do meadowlarks switch song types? Can J Zool 60:3400–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furmankiewicz J, Szkudlarek R (2001) The mating roosts of Nathusius’ pipistrelle males Pipistrellus nathusii (Keyserling and Blasius 1839) in Wroclaw (SW Poland). In: Woloszyn BW (ed) Distribution, ecology, paleontology and systematics of bats. Bats & man: million years of coexistence. Chiropterological Information Center, Krakow, pp 47–57Google Scholar
  24. Gerell-Lundberg K, Gerell R (1994) The mating behaviour of the pipistrelle and the Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Chiroptera)—a comparison. Folia Zool 43:315–324Google Scholar
  25. Häussler U, Nagel A, Braun M, Arnold A (1999) External characters discriminating species of European pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber 1774) and P. pygmaeus (Leach 1825). Myotis 37:27–40Google Scholar
  26. Houtman AM (1992) Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive mates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 249:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jarzembowski T, Stepniewska A (1998) Migration of the Nathusius’ pipistrelle Pipistrellus nathusii along Baltic coast. In: 11th international bat research conference, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasilia, Pirenopolis, 41Google Scholar
  28. Jones G, van Parijs SM (1993) Biomodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 251:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kapteyn K, Lina PHC (1994) First record of a nursery roost of Nathusius’ pipistrelle, Pipistrellus nathusii, in the Netherlands. Lutra 37:106–109Google Scholar
  30. Krebs JR, Ashcroft R, Webber M (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence in great tit. Nature 271:539–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laiolo P, Rolando A, Delestrade A, Sanctis A (2001) Geographic diversification in the call repertoire of the genus Pyrrhocorax (Aves, Corvidae). Can J Zool 79:1568–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambrechts M, Dhondt AA (1988) Male quality and territory quality in the great tit Parus major. Anim Behav 36:596–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lambrechts MM, Dhondt AA (1990) A relationship between the composition and size of great tit song repertoires. Anim Behav 39:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundberg K (1989) Social organization and survival of the pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), and a comparison of advertisement behaviour in three polygynous bat species. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Lundberg K, Gerell R (1986) Territorial advertisment and mate attraction in the bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Ethology 71(2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matessi G, Dabelsteen T, Pilastro A (2000) Responses to playback of different subspecies songs in the Reed Bunting Emberizas. schoeniclus. J Avian Biol 31:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuechterlein GL (1981) Courtship behavior and reproductive isolation between Western Grebe color morphs. Auk 98:335–349Google Scholar
  38. Pallett JR, Passmore NI (1988) The significance of multi-note advertisement calls in a reed frog. Hyperolius tuberilinguis. Bioacoustics 1:13–23Google Scholar
  39. Racey PA (1974) Ageing and assesment of reproductive status of pipistrelle bats (P. pipistrellus). J Zool 173:264–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Russ JM, O’Neill JK, Montgomery WI (1998a) Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii), Keyserling and Blasius 1839) breeding in Ireland. J Zool 245:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russ JM, Racey PA, Jones G (1998b) Intraspecific responses to distress calls of the pipistrelle bat, Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Anim Behav 55:705–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russ JM, Hutson AM, Montgomery WI, Racey PA, Speakman JR (2001) The status of Nathusius’ pipistrelle (Pipistrellus nathusii) Keyserling and Blasius 1839) in the British Isles. J Zool 254:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russ JM, Jones G, Mackie IJ, Racey PA (2004) Interspecific responses to distress calls in bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): a function for convergence in call design? Anim Behav 67:1005–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russ JM, Jones G, Racey PA (2005) Responses of soprano pipistrelles, Pipistrellus pygmaeus, to their experimentally modified distress calls. Anim Behav 70:393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russo D, Jones G (1999) The social calls of Kuhl’s pipistrelles Pipistrellus kuhlii (Kuhl 1819): structure and variation. J Zool 249:476–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryan MJ, Keddy-Hector A (1992) Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am Nat 139:S4–S35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Searcy WA, Andersson M (1986) Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 17:507–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sender T, Roedenbeck I, Hampl S, Ferreri M, Simon M (2002) Revision of morphological identification of pipistrelle bat phonic types (Pipistrellus pipistrellus Schreber 1774). Myotis 40:11–17Google Scholar
  49. Simmons LW (1987) Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (deGaer). Anim Behav 38:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Speakman JR, Racey PA (1991) No cost of echolocation for bats in flight. Nature 350:421–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strelkov PP (1997a) Breeding area and its position in range of migratory bats species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in east Europe and adjacent territories. Communication 1. Zool Z 76:1073–1082Google Scholar
  52. Strelkov PP (1997b) Breeding area and its position in range of migratory bats species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in east Europe and adjacent territories. Communication 2. Zool Z 76:1381–1390Google Scholar
  53. Vaughan N, Jones G, Harris S (1997) Identification of British bat species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacoustics 7:189–207Google Scholar
  54. von Helversen O, von Helversen D (1994) Forces driving coevolution of song and song recognition in grasshoppers. Folia Zool 43:331–338Google Scholar
  55. Von Helversen O, Holderied M (2003) Zur Unterscheidung von Zwergfledermaus (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) und Mückenfledermaus (Pipistrellus mediterraneus/pygmaeus) im Feld. Nyctalus 8:420–426Google Scholar
  56. Yalden DW (1985) The identification of British bats London. The Mammal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Yasukawa K, Blank JL, Patterson CB (1980) Song repertoire and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zahn A, Dippel B (1997) Male roosting habits, mating system and mating behaviour of Myotis myotis. J Zool 2243:659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zingg PE (1988) Search calls of echolocating Nyctalus leisleri and Pipistrellus savii (Mammalia: Chiroptera) recorded in Switzerland. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde 53:281–293Google Scholar
  60. Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Simmons LW (2001) Geographical variation in calling song of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: the importance of spatial scale. J Evol Biol 14:731–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations