Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 455–463 | Cite as

Mechanism of egg recognition in defenses against conspecific brood parasitism: American coots (Fulica americana) know their own eggs

  • Bruce Lyon
Original Article

Abstract

Hosts of avian brood parasites use a variety of defenses based on egg recognition to reduce the costs of parasitism; the most important of which is rejecting the parasitic eggs. Two basic recognition mechanisms are possible: “true recognition”, whereby hosts recognize their own eggs irrespective of their relative frequency in the clutch, and minority recognition (or “recognition by discordancy”), whereby hosts respond to the minority egg type. The mechanism of recognition has been experimentally studied in a handful of species parasitized by interspecific brood parasites, but the mechanism used in defenses against conspecific brood parasitism is unknown. I experimentally determined the mechanism of egg recognition in American coots (Fulica americana), a species with high levels of conspecific brood parasitism, egg recognition, and rejection. I swapped eggs between pairs of nests to alter frequencies of host and “parasite” eggs and then used two criteria for recognition: egg rejection and nonrandom incubation positions in the clutch. Eight of 12 nests (66%) given equal frequencies of host and parasite eggs showed evidence of true recognition. In contrast, only one of eight (12.5%) nests where host eggs were in the minority showed evidence of recognition by discordancy. The nonrandom incubation positions of parasitic eggs indicates that birds sometimes recognize parasitic eggs without rejecting them and provides a means of assessing recognition on a per nest basis in species with large clutches. Adaptive recognition without rejection may also be an important evolutionary stepping stone to the evolution of egg rejection in some taxa.

Keywords

Egg recognition Recognition mechanism Egg rejection Brood parasitism American coot 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Alexis Chaine, David Lahti, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Brad Bair, Louise Cargill, Susie Everding, Linda Hamilton, Daniel Hansen, Michael Magrath, and Carolyn Morrill assisted with fieldwork. Veera Bonner, Phil Ransen, Dave Falconer, Ron Boychuk, Brian Nuttall, and Ducks Unlimited Canada provided logistic support. The Chapman Fund of the American Museum of Natural History, the National Geographic Society, a dissertation improvement grant from the National Science Foundation, Princeton University, and the Sigma Xi Society provided financial support for the fieldwork and I was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF 0443807) during analysis and writing. The research was conducted under permits from the Canadian Wildlife Service and the Animal Care Committee of Princeton University.

References

  1. Andersson M (1984) Brood parasitism within species. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers. Croom Helm, London pp 195–228Google Scholar
  2. Arnold T (1987) Conspecific egg discrimination in American coots. Condor 89:675–676Google Scholar
  3. Arnold TW (1990) Food limitation and the adaptive significance of clutch size in American coots (Fulica americana). Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez F (1996) Model cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs accepted by rufous bush chats Cercotrichas galactotes during the parasite’s absence from the breeding area. Ibis 138:340–342Google Scholar
  5. Brooke M de L, Davies NB, Noble DG (1998) Rapid decline of host defenses in response to reduced cuckoo parasitism: behavioural flexibility of reed warblers in a changing world. Proc R Soc Lond 265:1277–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley PA, Buckley FG (1972) Individual egg and chick recognition in adult Royal terns (Sterna maxima maxima). Anim Behav 20:457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies NB, Brooke M (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counter-adaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies NB, Brooke M de L, Kacelnik A (1996) Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:925–931Google Scholar
  10. Drent R (1975) Incubation. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol V. Academic, New York pp 333–420Google Scholar
  11. Dugger BD, Bollmann LC, Fredrickson LH (1999) Responses of female hooded mergansers to eggs of an interspecific brood parasite. Auk 116:269–273Google Scholar
  12. Eadie JM (1989) Alternative reproductive tactics in a precocial bird: the ecology and evolution of brood parasitism in goldeneyes. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman S (1988) Egg variability and conspecific brood parasitism in the Ploceus weaverbirds. Ostrich 59:49–53Google Scholar
  14. Gaston AJ, DeForest LN, Nobel DG (1993) Egg recognition and egg stealing in murres (Uria spp). Anim Behav 45:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gullion GW (1953) Territorial behavior of the American coot. Condor 55:169–186Google Scholar
  16. Howell TR, Bartholomew GA (1969) Experiments on the nesting behavior of the red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon rubricauda. Condor 71:113–119Google Scholar
  17. Huggins RA (1941) Egg temperatures in wild birds under natural conditions. Ecology 22:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson WM (1992) Relative importance of parasitism by Chrysococcyx-cuckoos versus conspecific nest parasitism in the northern masked weaver Ploceus taeniopterus. Ornis Scand 23:2003–2206Google Scholar
  19. Kessler FW (1960) Egg temperatures of the ring-necked pheasant obtained with a self-recording potentiometer. Auk 77:330–336Google Scholar
  20. Lahti DC, Lahti AR (2002) How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim Behav 62:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindholm AK (2000) Tests of phenotypic plasticity in reed warbler defences against cuckoo parasitism. Behaviour 137:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo–host coevolution. Anim Behav 49:1185–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyon BE (1993a) Brood parasitism as a flexible female reproductive tactic in American coots. Anim Behav 46:911–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyon BE (1993b) Tactics of parasitic American coots: host choice and the pattern of egg dispersion among host nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon BE, Hochachka WM, Eadie JM (2002) Paternity-parasitism trade-offs: a model and test of host–parasite cooperation in an avian conspecific brood parasite. Evolution 56:1253–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mallory ML, Weatherhead PJ (1993) Responses of nesting mergansers to parasitic common goldeneye eggs. Anim Behav 46:1226–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCabe RA, Hale RJ (1960) An attempt to establish a colony of yellow-headed blackbirds. Auk 77:425–432Google Scholar
  29. McRae SB (1996) Brood parasitism in the moorhen: brief encounters between parasites and hosts and the significance of an evening laying hour. J Avian Biol 27:311–320Google Scholar
  30. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsne L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC (1991) Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour 116:64–89Google Scholar
  31. Moksnes A (1992) Egg recognition in chaffinches and bramblings. Anim Behav 44:993–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Payne RB (1967) Interspecific communication signals in parasitic birds. Am Nat 101:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Payne RB (1977) The ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 8:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peer BD, Sealy SC (2001) Mechanism of egg recognition in the great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus). Bird Behav 14:71–73Google Scholar
  35. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rohwer FC, Freeman S (1989) The distribution of conspecific nest parasitism in birds. Can J Zool 67:239–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rothstein SI (1975a) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim Behav 23:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothstein SI (1975b) An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor 77:250–271Google Scholar
  39. Rothstein SI (1977) Cowbird parasitism and egg recognition in northern orioles. Wilson Bull 89:21–32Google Scholar
  40. Rothstein SI (1978) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: additional evidence for learned components. Anim Behav 26:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rothstein SI (1982) Mechanisms of egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit egg responses by rejecter species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaffner FC (1990) Egg recognition by elegant terns. Colon Waterbirds 13:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sealy SG, Bazin RC (1995) Low frequency of observed cowbird parasitism on eastern kingbirds: host rejection, effective nest defence, or parasite avoidance? Behav Ecol 6:140–145Google Scholar
  45. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Press, Oxford pp 69–96Google Scholar
  46. Shugart GW (1987) Individual clutch recognition by caspian terns. Anim Behav 35:1563–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soler JJ, Sorci G, Soler M, Møller AP (1999) Change in host rejection behavior mediated by the predatory behavior of its brood parasite. Behav Ecol 10:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soler M, Palomino J, Mártin-Vivaldi M, Soler JJ (2000) Lack of consistency in the response of rufous-tailed scrub robins Cercotrichas galactotes towards parasitic common cuckoo eggs. Ibis 142:151–154Google Scholar
  49. Sorenson MD (1997) Effects of intra-and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback Aythya valisineria. Behav Ecol 8:153–161Google Scholar
  50. Tschanz B (1968) Trottelummen (Uria aalge aalge Pont.) Z Tierpsychol 4:1–103Google Scholar
  51. Underwood TJ, Sealy SG (2002) Adaptive significance of egg coloration. In: Deeming DC (ed), Avian incubation: behaviour, environment and evolution. Oxford University, Oxford pp 280–290Google Scholar
  52. Victoria JK (1972) Clutch characteristics and egg discriminative ability in the African village weaverbird Ploceus cucullatus. Ibis 114:367–376Google Scholar
  53. Yom Tov Y (2001) An updated list and some comments on the occurrence of intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Ibis 143:133–143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations