Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 399–404

Positive correlation between helpers at nest and nestling immune response in a cooperative breeding bird

  • Juliana Valencia
  • Elena Solís
  • Gabriele Sorci
  • Carlos de la Cruz
Original article


In cooperatively breeding species, helpers may contribute to the success of the brood by increasing the number of independent offspring, but also, they may affect offspring condition and, hence, their survival and recruitment into the breeding population. This second type of benefits is rarely included in theoretical models or assessed in field studies. Immune response is a good proxy of individual quality and fitness, and there is good evidence that the performance of the immune system of chicks during the nestling phase is related to their chances of survival and future reproduction. However, no study has so far explored whether helpers at the nest might contribute to enhance immune functioning of nestlings in species with a cooperative breeding system. Here we investigate this issue in the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyanus) and found for the first time a positive correlation between the number of helpers at nest and the cell-mediated immune response of nestlings. This effect was not explained by a general improvement of body condition of chicks because it was independent of individual variation in body mass or tarsus length. Our results suggest that helping can have subtle effects on the quality of offspring that may influence their survival and future reproduction.


Immune response Cooperative breeding Nestling condition 


  1. Allainé D, Brondex F, Graziani L, Coulon J, Till-Bottraud I (2000) Male-biased sex ratio in litters of Alpine marmots supports the helper repayment hypothesis. Behav Ecol 11:507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso-Alvarez C, Tella JL (2001) Effects of experimental food restriction and body-mass changes on the avian T-cell-mediated immune response. Can J Zool 79:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apanius V (1998) Stress and immune defense. Adv Stud Behav 27:133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blas J, Baos R, Bortolotti GR, Marchant t, Hiraldo F (2005) A multi-tier approach to identifying environmental stress in altricial nestling birds. Funct Ecol 19:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blount JD, Houston DC, Møller AP, Wright J (2003) Do individual branches of immune defence correlate? A comparative case study of scavenging and non-scavenging birds. Oikos 102:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boland CRJ, Heinsohn R, Cockburn A (1997) Deception by helpers in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs and its experimental manipulation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonneaud C, Mazuc J, González G, Haussy C, Chastel O, Faivre B, Sorci G (2003) Assessing the cost of mounting an immune response. Am Nat 161:367–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinkhof MWG, Heeb P, Kölliker M, Richner H (1999) Immunocompetence of nestling great tits in relation to rearing environment and parentage. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2315–2322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown JL (1987) Helping and communal breeding in birds: ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JL, Brown ER (1981) Kin selection and individual fitness in babblers. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 244–256Google Scholar
  11. Brown JL, Brown ER, Brown SD, Dow DD (1982) Helpers effects of experimental removal on reproductive success. Science 215:421–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canoine V, Hayden T, Rowe K, Goymann W (2002) The stress response of European stonechats depends on the type of stressor. Behavior 139:1303–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra RK (1996) Nutrition, immunity and infection: from basic knowledge of dietary manipulation of immune responses to practical application of ameliorating suffering and improving survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:14304–14307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chandra RK, Newberne PM (1977) Nutrition, immunity, and infection. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Christe P, Møller AP, de Lope F (1998) Immunocompetence and nestling survival in the house martin: the tasty chick hypothesis. Oikos 83:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christe P, de Lope F, González G, Saino N, Møller AP (2001) The influence of environmental conditions on immune responses, morphology and recapture probability of nestling house martins (Delichon urbica). Oecologia 126:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock TH, Russell AF, Sharpe LL (2003) Meerkat helpers do not specialize in particular activities. Anim Behav 66:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, vol 8. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruz C, Solís E, Valencia J, Chastel O, Sorci G (2003). Testosterone and helping behavior in the azure-winged magpie (Cyanopica cyanus): natural covariation and experimental test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis SL (1998) Environmental modulation of the immune system via the endocrine system. Domest Anim Endocrinol 15:283–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Demas GE, Chefer V, Talan MI, Nelson RJ (1997) Metabolic costs of mounting an antigen-stimulated immune response in adult and aged C57BL/6J mice. Am J Physiol 273:R1631–R1637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Demas GE, Drazen DL, Nelson RJ (2003) Reductions in total body fat decrease humoral immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:905–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickinson JL, Hatchwell BJ (2004) Fitness consequences of helping. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 48–66Google Scholar
  24. Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1991) Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakuru: the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. J Anim Ecol 60:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eraud C, Duriez O, Chastel O, Faivre B (2005) The energetic cost of humoral immunity in the Collared Dove, Streptopelia decaocto: is the magnitude sufficient to force energy-based trade-offs? Funct Ecol 19:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gershwin ME, Beach RS, Hurley LS (1985) Nutrition and immunity. Academic, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  27. González G, Sorci G, Møller AP, Ninni P, Haussy C, de Lope F (1999) Immunocompetence and condition-dependent sexual advertisement in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). J Anim Ecol 68:1225–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodwin D (1986) Crows of the world. British Museum (Natural History), LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Grimble RF, Grimble GK (1998) Immunonutrition: role of sulfur amino acid, related amino acids, and polyamines. Nutrition 14:605–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross WB, Siegel PB (1988) Environment-genetic influences on immunocompetence. J Anim Sci 66:2091–2094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gwinner H, Oltrogge M, Trost L, Nienaber U (2000) Green plants in starling nests: effects on nestlings. Anim Behav 59:301–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hatchwell BJ (1999) Investment strategies of breeders in avian cooperative breeding systems. Am Nat 154:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hatchwell BJ, Russell AF, MacColl ADC, Ross DJ, Fowlie MK, McGowan A (2004) Helpers increase long-term but not short-term productivity in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Behav Ecol 15:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horak P, Tegelmann L, Ots I, Møller AP (1999) Immune function and survival of great tit nestlings in relation to growth conditions. Oecologia 121:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hosono T (1983) A study of the life history of Blue Magpie (II). Breeding helpers and nest-parasitism by cuckoos. Journal of the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology 15:63–71Google Scholar
  36. Johnsen A, Andersen V, Sunding C, Lifjeld JT (2000) Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulation. Nature 406:296–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Klasing KC (1998) Nutritional modulation of resistance to infectious diseases. Poultry Sci 77:1119–1125Google Scholar
  38. Koenig WD, Mumme RL (1987) Population ecology of the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  39. Komdeur J (1994) Experimental evidence for helping and hindering by previous offspring in the cooperative-breeding Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Komeda S, Yamagishi S, Fujioka M (1987) Cooperative breeding in Azure-winged magpies, Cyanopica cyana, living in a region of heavy snowfall. Condor 89:835–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lochmiller RL, Vestey MR, Boren JC (1993) Relationship between protein nutritional status and immunocompetence in northern bobwhite chicks. Auk 110:503–510Google Scholar
  42. Marcos A, Nova E, Montero A (2003) Changes in the immune system are conditioned by nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:S66–S69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moreno J, Merino S, Sanz JJ, Arriero E, Morales J, Tomás G (2005) Nestling cell-mediated immune response, body mass and hatching date as predictors of local recruitment in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. J Avian Biol 36:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2000) Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumble-bee workers. Science 290:1166–1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mullner A, Linsenmair KE, Wikelski M (2004) Exposure to ecotourism reduces survival and affects stress response in hoatzin chicks (Opisthocomus hoazin). Biol Conserv 118:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mumme RL (1992) Do helpers increase reproductive success? An experimental analysis in the Florida scrub jay. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Powell RA, Fried JJ (1992) Helping by juvenile pine voles (Microtus pinetorum), growth and survival of younger siblings, and the evolution of pine vole sociality. Behav Ecol 3:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Råberg L, Stjernman M (2003) Natural selection on immune responsiveness in blue tits Parus caeruleus. Evolution 57:1670–1678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reyer H-U (1984) Investment and relatedness: a cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Anim Behav 32:1163–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rolff J, Siva-Jothy MT (2003) Invertebrate ecological immunology. Science 301:472–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rood JP (1990) Group size, survival, reproduction, and routes to breeding in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 39:566–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russell AF (2004) Mammals: comparisons and contrasts. In: Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (eds). Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 210–227Google Scholar
  53. Russell E, Rowley I (1988) Helper contributions to reproductive success in the splendid fairy-wren (Malurus splendens). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell AF, Brotherton PNM, McIlrath GM, Sharpe LL, Clutton-Brock TH (2003) Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state. Behav Ecol 14:486–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sacarrao GF (1967) Remarques sur la variation geographique de la Pie-bleue, Cyanopica cyanus (Pall) dans la Peninsule Iberique, specialement au Portugal. Arq Mus Bocage 1:241–248Google Scholar
  56. Scheuerlein A, Van’t Hof TJ, Gwinner E (2001) Predators as stressors? Physiological and reproductive consequences of predation risk in tropical stonechats (Saxicola torquata axillaris). Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1575–1582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S (1996) Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Evol Ecol 11:317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smits JE, Bortolotti GR, Tella JL (1999) Simplifying the phytohaemagglutinin skin-testing technique in studies of avian immunocompetence. Funct Ecol 13:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Soler JJ, de Neve L, Pérez-Contreras T, Soler M, Sorci G (2003) Trade-off between immunocompetence and growth in magpies: an experimental study. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solomon NG (1991) Current indirect fitness benefits associated with philopatry in juvenile prairie voles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Solomon NG, French JA (1997) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taborsky M, Limberger D (1981) Helpers in fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:143–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Valencia J, de la Cruz C, Carranza J (2000) Second broods in a Mediterranean cooperatively-breeding corvid: the azure-winged magpie. Etología 8:17–19Google Scholar
  65. Valencia J, de la Cruz C, Carranza J (2002) Timing of breeding in the azure-winged magpie in Spain. Etología 10:17–22Google Scholar
  66. Valencia J, de la Cruz C, González B (2003) Flexible helping behaviour in the azure-winged magpie. Ethology 119:545–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valencia J, de la Cruz C, Carranza J, Mateos C (2006) Parents increase their parental effort when aided by helpers in a cooperatively breeding bird. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  68. van Boven M, Weissing FJ (2004) The evolutionary economics of immunity. Am Nat 163:277–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Waser PM, Creel SR, Lucas JR (1994) Death and disappearance: estimating mortality risks associated with philopatry and dispersal. Behav Ecol 5:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Westneat DF, Weiskittle J, Edenfield R, Kinnard TB , Poston JP (2004) Correlates of cell-mediated immunity in nestling house sparrows. Oecologia 141:17–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wilson K, Thomas MB, Blanford S, Doggett M, Simpson SJ, Moore SL (2002) Coping with crowds: density-dependent disease resistance in desert locusts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5471–5475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1984) The Florida scrub jay: demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  73. Zuk M, Stoehr AM (2002) Immune defense and host life history. Am Nat 160:S9–S22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliana Valencia
    • 1
    • 3
  • Elena Solís
    • 2
  • Gabriele Sorci
    • 1
    • 4
  • Carlos de la Cruz
    • 2
  1. 1.Lab. Parasitologie Evolutive, CNRS UMR 7103Univ. Pierre et Marie CurieParis cedex 05France
  2. 2.Area de Zoología, Fac. CienciasUniv. ExtremaduraBadajozSpain
  3. 3.Biología y Etología, Fac. VeterinariaUniv. ExtremaduraCáceresSpain
  4. 4.BioGéoSciences, CNRS UMR 5561Université de BourgogneDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations