Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 327–338

Spatial relationships and matrilineal kinship in African savanna elephant (Loxodonta africana) clans

  • Russell A. Charif
  • Rob Roy RameyII
  • William R. LangbauerJr.
  • Katharine B. Payne
  • Rowan B. Martin
  • Laura M. Brown
Original Article

Abstract

African savanna elephants, Loxodonta africana, live in stable family groups consisting of adult females and their dependent offspring. During the dry season, “clans” consisting of several family groups typically share a common home range. We compared spatial relationships and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes among 14 adult female elephants within 3 clans during the dry season in northern Zimbabwe. Spatial relationships were studied by radio-tracking. Home-range similarity was quantified by correlating the estimated utilization distributions of all pairs of elephants. Clans were identified by cluster analysis of the home-range similarity values. All three clans contained at least two of the five mtDNA haplotypes that were found, indicating that clan members are not necessarily matrilineally related. Within clans, home ranges of elephants with the same haplotype were not significantly more similar to each other than those of elephants with different haplotypes. Most elephants within each clan used their shared home ranges independently of each other: the distribution of distances between their positions at any given time did not differ from the distribution expected by chance. However, 8 out of the 26 within-clan pairs exhibited long-term coordination of space use by remaining within known hearing distance of each other’s low-frequency calls significantly more often than expected by chance. At least four of these coordinated pairs consisted of animals in different family groups. Elephants in three of the four different-family pairs whose movements were coordinated had different haplotypes. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between these coordinated movements and conventionally defined bond-group behavior.

Keywords

African elephant Loxodonta africana Home range Utilization distribution Mitochondrial DNA 

Supplementary material

Fig. S1 Utilization distributions (UDs) for 14 radio-collared elephants in three clans. Grayscale darkness of the plot indicates probability of occurrence at a given point. The contour lines on each map encompass the innermost 50% and 95% of each animal’s UD. The values plotted here are those used to calculate home range correlation values; Figure 3 in the main text shows a simplified representation of these data. Labels (cN) indicate each animal’s collar number. Letters (A – E) indicate mtDNA haplotypes

supp.pdf (528 kb)
(PDF 529 KB)

References

  1. De Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dietz EJ (1983) Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Syst Zool 32:21–26Google Scholar
  3. Doncaster CP (1990) Non-parametric estimates of interaction from radio-tracking data. J Theor Biol 143:431–443Google Scholar
  4. Douglas-Hamilton I (1972) On the ecology and behaviour of the African elephant. PhD Thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernando P, Lande R (2000) Molecular genetic and behavioral analysis of social organization in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fernando P, Pfrender ME, Encalada SE, Lande R (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variation, phylogeography and population structure of the Asian elephant. Heredity 84:362–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Guy P (1974) Feeding behaviour of the African elephant in the Sengwa Research Area of Rhodesia. MSc Thesis, University of Rhodesia, SalisburyGoogle Scholar
  8. Langbauer WR, Payne KB, Charif RA, Rapaport L, Osborn F (1991) African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low-frequency conspecific calls. J Exp Biol 157:35–46Google Scholar
  9. Larom D, Garstang M, Payne K, Raspet R, Lindeque M (1997) The influence of surface atmospheric conditions on the range and area reached by animal vocalizations. J Exp Biol 200:421–431PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin RB (1978) Aspects of elephant social organisation. Rhod Sci News 12:184–187Google Scholar
  11. MathWorks (1992) MATLAB Reference Guide. MathWorks, Natick, MassGoogle Scholar
  12. McComb K, Moss C, Sayaliel S, Baker L (2000) Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim Behav 59:1103–1109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McComb K, Reby D, Baker L, Moss C, Sayaliel S (2003) Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants. Anim Behav 65:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moss CJ (1988) Elephant memories. Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Moss CJ, Poole JH (1983) Relationships and social structure of African elephants. In: Hinde RA (ed) Primate social relationships: an integrated approach. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Mullenbach R, Lagoda PJL, Welter C (1989) An efficient salt-chloroform extraction of DNA from blood and tissues. Trend Genet 5:391Google Scholar
  17. Nyakaana S, Arctander P (1999) Population genetic structure of the African elephant in Uganda based on variation at mitochondrial and nuclear loci. Evidence for male-biased gene flow. Mol Ecol 8:1105–1115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nyakaana S, Abe EL, Arctander P, Siegismund HR (2001) DNA evidence for elephant social behaviour breakdown in Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda. Anim Conserv 4:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osborn FV (1998) The ecology of crop-raiding elephants in Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Payne K (1998) Silent thunder. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Poole JH (1987) Rutting behaviour in African elephants: the phenomenon of musth. Behaviour 102:283–316Google Scholar
  22. Poole JH, Moss CJ (1981) Musth in the African elephant, Loxodonta africana. Nature 292:830–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Poole JH, Payne KB, Langbauer WR Jr, Moss CJ (1988) The social contexts of some very low-frequency calls of African elephants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roca AL, Georgiadis N, Pecon-Slattery J, O’Brien SJ (2001) Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa. Science 293:1473–1477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schnell GD, Watt DJ, Douglas ME (1985) Statistical comparison of proximity matrices: applications in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 33:239–253Google Scholar
  26. Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085Google Scholar
  27. StatSoft (1994) STATISTICA for the Macintosh. StatSoft, Tulsa, OklaGoogle Scholar
  28. Sukumar R (2003) The living elephants. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Swihart RK, Slade NA (1985) Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66:1176–1184Google Scholar
  30. Thouless CR (1996) Home ranges and social organization of female elephants in northern Kenya. Afr J Ecol 34:284–297Google Scholar
  31. White GC, Garrott RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168Google Scholar
  33. Worton BJ (1995) Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. J Wildl Manage 59:794–800Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell A. Charif
    • 1
  • Rob Roy RameyII
    • 2
  • William R. LangbauerJr.
    • 3
  • Katharine B. Payne
    • 1
  • Rowan B. Martin
    • 4
  • Laura M. Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Bioacoustics Research Program, Laboratory of OrnithologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Dept. of ZoologyDenver Museum of Nature & ScienceUSA
  3. 3.Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG AquariumUSA
  4. 4.GreendaleHarareZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations