Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 23–31

Does the presence of non-breeders enhance the fitness of breeders? An experimental analysis in the clown anemonefish Amphiprion percula

Original Article

Abstract

The stability of animal societies depends on individuals’ decisions about whether to tolerate or evict others and about whether to stay or leave. These decisions, in turn, depend on individuals’ costs and benefits of living in the group. The clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula, lives in groups composed of a breeding pair and zero to four non-breeders. To determine why breeders accept the presence of non-breeders in this species I investigated the effect of non-breeders on multiple components of the breeders’ fitness. Non-breeders did not assist breeders in any obvious way. Experimental removal of non-breeders had no significant effect on the survival, growth, or reproductive success of breeders. Experimental removal of one of the breeding pair showed that non-breeders had little effect on the time taken for a widowed breeder to recommence breeding. The results indicate that the presence of non-breeders neither enhances, nor reduces, the fitness of breeders in A. percula. I suggest that non-breeders might modulate their effect on the fitness of breeders, either by reducing the costs they inflict or by increasing the benefits they provide, such that it just pays breeders to tolerate, rather than to evict, them. This study illustrates that animal societies can be stable even when some individuals gain nothing from the association.

Keywords

Cooperative breeding Helpers Sociality Reproductive skew Marine fish 

References

  1. Allen GR (1972) The anemonefishes: their classification and biology, 2nd edn. TFH Publications, Neptune City, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Balshine-Earn S, Neat FC, Reid H, Taborsky M, (1998) Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 9:432–438Google Scholar
  3. Beukers JS, Jones GP (1997) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef population. Oecologia 114:50–59Google Scholar
  4. Booth DJ (1995) Juvenile groups in a coral-reef damselfish: density-dependent effects on individual fitness and population demography. Ecology 76:91–106Google Scholar
  5. Brown JL, Brown ER (1981) Kin selection and individual fitness in babblers. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (ed) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron, New York, pp 244–256Google Scholar
  6. Brown JL, Brown ER, Brown SD, Dow DD (1982) Helpers: effects of experimental removal on reproductive success. Science 215:421–422Google Scholar
  7. Buston PM (2002) Group structure of the clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula. PhD Diss, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  8. Buston PM (2003a) Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behav Ecol 14:576–582Google Scholar
  9. Buston PM (2003b) Size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature 424:145–146Google Scholar
  10. Buston PM (2003c) Mortality is associated with social rank in the clown anemonefish (Amphiprion percula). Mar Biol 143:811–815Google Scholar
  11. Buston PM (2004) Territory inheritance in the clown anemonefish. Proc R Soc B [Suppl] 271:S252–S254Google Scholar
  12. Clifton KE (1990) The costs and benefits of territory sharing for the Caribbean coral reef fish, Scarus iserti. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:139–147Google Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH, Brotherton PNM, Smith R, McIlrath GM, Kansky R, Gaynor D, O’riain MJ, Skinner JD (1998) Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2291–2295Google Scholar
  14. Danchin E, Wagner RH (1997) The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends Ecol Evol 12:342–347Google Scholar
  15. Elliott JK, Mariscal RN (2001) Coexistence of nine anemonefish species: differential host and habitat utilization, size and recruitment. Mar Biol 138:23–36Google Scholar
  16. Elliott JK, Elliott JM, Mariscal RN (1995) Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Mar Biol 122:377–389Google Scholar
  17. Emlen ST (1991) Evolution of cooperative breeding in birds and mammals. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 301–337Google Scholar
  18. Emlen ST, Wrege PH (1991) Breeding biology of white-fronted bee-eaters at Nakuru: the influence of helpers on breeder fitness. J Anim Ecol 60:309–326Google Scholar
  19. Ens BJ, Kersten M, Brenninkmeijer A, Hulscher JB (1992) Territory quality, parental effort and reproductive success of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) J Anim Ecol 61:703–715Google Scholar
  20. Faulkes CG, Bennett NC (2001) Family values: group dynamics and social control of reproduction in African mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 16:184–190Google Scholar
  21. Fautin DG (1992) Anemonefish recruitment: the roles of order and chance. Symbiosis 14:143–160Google Scholar
  22. Fautin DG, Allen GR (1992) Field guide to anemonefishes and their host sea anemones. Western Australian Museum, Perth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Fautin DG, Godwin JR (1992) Defense of host actinians by anemonefishes. Copeia 1992:902–908Google Scholar
  24. Fricke HW (1979) Mating system, resource defense and sex change in the anemonefish Amphiprion akallopisos. Z Tierpsychol 50:313–326Google Scholar
  25. Fricke H, Fricke S (1977) Monogamy and sex change by aggressive dominance in coral reef fish. Nature 266:830–832Google Scholar
  26. Gaston AJ (1978) The evolution of group territorial behavior and cooperative breeding. Am Nat 112:1091–1100Google Scholar
  27. Goldstein JM, Woolfenden GE, Hailman JP (1998) A same-sex stepparent shortens a prebreeder’s duration on the natal territory: tests of two hypotheses in Florida scrub-jays. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:15–22Google Scholar
  28. Hattori A (1994) Inter-group movement and mate acquisition tactics of the protandrous anemonefish, Amphiprion clarkii, on a coral reef, Okinawa. Jpn J Ichthyol 41:159–165Google Scholar
  29. Higashi M, Yamamura N (1993) What determines animal group size? Insider–outsider conflict and its resolution. Am Nat 142:553–563Google Scholar
  30. Hixon MA, Carr MH (1997) Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish. Science 227:946–949Google Scholar
  31. Johnstone RA, Cant MA (1999) Reproductive skew and the threat of eviction: a new perspective. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:275–279Google Scholar
  32. Jones GP (1986) Food availability affects growth in a coral reef fish. Oecologia 70:136–139Google Scholar
  33. Keller L, Reeve HK (1994) Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends Evol Ecol 9:98–102Google Scholar
  34. Kokko H, Johnstone RA, Wright J (2002) The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay? Behav Ecol 13:291–300Google Scholar
  35. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1991) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 305–306Google Scholar
  36. Leonard ML, Horn AG, Eden SF (1989) Does juvenile helping enhance breeder reproductive success? A removal experiment on moorhens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:357–361Google Scholar
  37. Lindstrom K, Hellstrom M (1993) Male size and parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Ethol Ecol Evol 5:97–106Google Scholar
  38. Lundy KJ, Parker PG, Zahavi A (1998) Reproduction by subordinates in cooperatively breeding Arabian babblers is uncommon but predictable. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:173–180Google Scholar
  39. Mariscal RN (1970) The nature of the symbiosis between Indo-Pacific anemonefishes and sea anemones. Mar Biol 6:58–65Google Scholar
  40. Mitchell JS (2003) Social correlates of reproductive success in false clown anemonefish: subordinate group members do not pay-to-stay. Evol Ecol Res 5:89–104Google Scholar
  41. Moyer JT (1986) Longevity of the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii at Miyake-jima, Japan with notes on four other species. Copeia 1986:135–139Google Scholar
  42. Moyer JT, Nakazano A (1978) Protandrous hermaphroditism in six species of the anemonefish genus Amphiprion. Jpn J Icthyol 25:101–106Google Scholar
  43. Mumme RL (1992) Do helpers increase reproductive success? An experimental analysis in the Florida scrub jay. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:319–328Google Scholar
  44. Nelson JS, Chou LM, Phang Violet PE (1994) Pigmentation variation in the anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): type, stability and its usefulness for individual identification. Raffles Bull Zool 42:927–930Google Scholar
  45. Ochi H (1989) Acquisition of breeding space by non-breeders in the anemonefish Amphiprion clarkii in temperate waters of southern Japan. Ethology 83:279–294Google Scholar
  46. Reyer H (1980) Flexible helper structure as an ecological adaptation in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis rudis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:219–227Google Scholar
  47. Reyer H (1984) Investment and relatedness: a cost/benefit analysis of breeding and helping in the pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Anim Behav 32:1163–1178Google Scholar
  48. Rood JP (1990) Group size, survival, reproduction, and routes to breeding in dwarf mongooses. Anim Behav 39:566–572Google Scholar
  49. Ross RM (1978) Reproductive behavior of the anemonefish Amphiprion melanopus on Guam. Copeia 1978:103–107Google Scholar
  50. Russell E, Rowley I (1988) Helper contributions to reproductive success in the splendid fairy-wren Malurus splendens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:131–140Google Scholar
  51. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (2003) Mutualism can mediate competition and promote co-existence. Ecol Lett 6:898–902Google Scholar
  52. Taborsky M (1984) Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: their costs and benefits. Anim Behav 32:1236–1252Google Scholar
  53. Taborsky M (1985) Breeder–helper conflict in a cichlid fish with broodcare helpers: an experimental analysis. Behavior 95:45–75Google Scholar
  54. Tupper M, Boutilier RG (1995) Effects of conspecific density on settlement, growth and post-settlement survival of a temperate reef fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 191:209–222Google Scholar
  55. Walters JR (1990) Red-cockaded woodpeckers: a ‘primitive’ cooperative breeder. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 69–101Google Scholar
  56. Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effect of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548Google Scholar
  57. Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1984) The Florida scrub jay: demography of a cooperative breeding bird. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  58. Wootton RJ (1990) Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.National Center for Ecological Analysis and SynthesisUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations