Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 594–601 | Cite as

Quorum sensing during nest-site selection by honeybee swarms

Original Article

Abstract

This study addresses a question about the nest-site selection process of honeybee swarms: how do the scout bees know when to initiate the preparation for their swarm’s move to their new home? We tested the quorum-sensing hypothesis: that the scouts do this by noting when one of the potential nest sites under consideration is being visited by a sufficiently large number of scouts. A falsifiable prediction of this hypothesis is that delaying the formation of a quorum of scout bees at a swarm’s chosen nest cavity, while leaving the rest of the decision-making process undisturbed, should delay the start of worker piping (the prepare-for-takeoff signal) and thus the takeoff of the swarm. In paired trials, we presented each of four swarms once with five nest boxes close to each other at a site and once with a single nest box. The multiple nest boxes caused the scouts visiting the site to be dispersed among five identical nest cavities rather than concentrated at one. We observed long delays in the start of piping and the start of takeoff in the five-nest-box trials relative to the one-nest-box trials. These results provide strong support for the quorum-sensing hypothesis.

Keywords

Group decision making Honeybees Nest-site selection Quorum sensing Swarming 

References

  1. Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A (2003) Bees trade-off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424:388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Combs GF (1972) The engorgement of swarming worker honeybees. J Apic Res 11:121–128Google Scholar
  3. Dyer FC (2000) Group movement and individual cognition: lessons from social insects. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 127–164Google Scholar
  4. Esch H (1967) The sounds produced by swarming honey bees. Z Vergl Physiol 56:408–411Google Scholar
  5. Esch H (1976) Body temperature and flight performance of honey bees in a servomechanically controlled wind tunnel. J Comp Physiol 109:264–277Google Scholar
  6. Esch H, Goller F, Heinrich B (1991) How do bees shiver? Naturwissenschaften 78:325–328Google Scholar
  7. Franks NR, Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Britton NF, Sumpter DJT (2002) Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 337:1567–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Fitzsimmons JP, Stevens M (2003) Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2457–2463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heinrich B (1979) Thermoregulation of African and European honeybees during foraging, attack, and hive exits and returns. J Exp Biol 80:217–229Google Scholar
  10. Heinrich B (1981) The mechanisms and energetics of honeybee swarm temperature regulation. J Exp Biol 91:25–55Google Scholar
  11. Lindauer M (1955) Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z Vergl Physiol 37:263–324Google Scholar
  12. Lindauer M (1971) Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  13. Mallon EB, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2001) Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin P (1963) Die Steuerung der Volksteilung beim Schwärmen der Bienen. Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Problem der Wanderschwärme. Insectes Soc 10:13–42Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell C (1970) Weights of workers and drones. Am Bee J 110:468–469Google Scholar
  16. Osman A, Lou LG, Muller-Gethman H, Rinkenauer G, Mattes S, Ulrich R (2000) Mechanisms of speed–accuracy trade-off: evidence from covert motor processes. Biol Psychol 51:173–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schneider SS, Lewis LA (2004) The vibrational signal, modulatory communication and organization of labor in honey bees, Apis mellifera. Apidologie 35:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seeley TD (1977) Measurement of nest cavity volume by the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:201–227Google Scholar
  20. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (1999) Group decision making in swarms of honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the “best-of-N” decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seeley TD, Tautz J (2001) Worker piping in honey bee swarms and its role in preparing for liftoff. J Comp Physiol A 187:667–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2003) Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seeley TD, Visscher PK (2004) Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie 35:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seeley TD, Morse RA, Visscher PK (1979) The natural history of the flight of honey bee swarms. Psyche 86:103–113Google Scholar
  26. Seeley TD, Kleinhenz M, Bujok B, Tautz J (2003) Thorough warm-up before take-off in honey bee swarms. Naturwissenschaften 90:256–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Visscher PK, Camazine S (1999) The mystery of swarming honeybees: from individual behaviors to collective decisions. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 355–378Google Scholar
  28. Weidenmüller A, Seeley TD (1999) Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations