Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 279–285

Vocal mediation of foraging competition in the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus)

Original Article

Abstract

Many group-living species produce frequent vocalisations when foraging, but the function of these food-associated calls is often difficult to divine. I investigated the ‘kek’ call of the cooperatively breeding green woodhoopoe (Phoeniculus purpureus), a species in which individuals have preferred foraging techniques dependent on their bill size. Individuals called at a greater rate (1) in foraging compared to non-foraging situations, and (2) in groups containing potential foraging competitors (i.e. individuals that foraged using the same preferred techniques). I therefore asked whether the kek call is used to recruit conspecific foragers or whether it acts as a vocal signal of foraging niche and mediates foraging competition. Foragers that were vocalising were no more likely to be approached than those that were silent, and individuals gained no foraging advantage from the close proximity of another group member. Thus, keks are unlikely to be used to recruit conspecifics. Instead, they appear to regulate spacing between potential foraging competitors. Although an individual forager was equally likely to be closely approached by all other group members, it increased its calling rate only in response to potential foraging competitors. This increase in calling rate resulted in the approaching individual moving away, thus maintaining some separation between individuals that forage in the same way. Maintenance of such spacing is important because the success rate of an individual decreased when a foraging competitor was close by.

Keywords

Food-associated calls Foraging techniques Spatial-separation hypothesis Vocal signals Vocalisations 

References

  1. Arcese P, Stoddard PK, Hiebert SM (1988) The form and function of song in female song sparrows. Condor 90:44–50Google Scholar
  2. Benz JJ (1993) Food-elicited vocalisations in golden lion tamarins: design features for representational communication. Anim Behav 45:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boinski S (1991) The coordination of spatial position: a field study of the vocal behaviour of adult female squirrel monkeys. Anim Behav 41:89–102Google Scholar
  4. Boinski S, Campbell AF (1996) The huh vocalisation of white-faced capuchins: a spacing call disguised as a food call? Ethology 102:826–840Google Scholar
  5. Brown CR, Brown MB, Shaffer ML (1991) Food-sharing signals among socially foraging cliff swallows. Anim Behav 42:551–564Google Scholar
  6. Chapman CA, Lefebvre L (1990) Manipulating foraging group size: spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees. Anim Behav 39:891–896Google Scholar
  7. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1982) How vervet monkeys perceive their grunts: field playback experiments. Anim Behav 30:739–751Google Scholar
  8. Clark AP, Wrangham RW (1993) Acoustic analysis of wild chimpanzee pant hoots: do chimpanzees have an acoustically distinct food arrival pant hoot? Am J Primatol 31:99–110Google Scholar
  9. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology 1993. CANARY 1.2. Bioacoustics Research Program, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittus WPJ (1984) Toque macaque food calls: semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment. Anim Behav 32:470–477Google Scholar
  11. Elgar MA (1986) House sparrows establish foraging flocks by giving chirrup calls if the resources are divisible. Anim Behav 34:41–47Google Scholar
  12. Evans RM (1982) Foraging-flock recruitment at a black-billed gull colony: implications for the information centre hypothesis. Auk 99:24–30Google Scholar
  13. Farabaugh SM, Dooling RJ (1996) Acoustic communication in parrots: laboratory and field studies of budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 97–117Google Scholar
  14. Fry HC, Keith S, Urban EK (1988) The birds of Africa, vol 3. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Gautier J-P, Gautier A (1977) Communication in old world monkeys. In: Sebeok T (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 890–964Google Scholar
  16. Groothuis T, Morimando F, Hutchison RE (1993) Testosterone and the development of postural and vocal displays in the barbary dove. In: Signoret J, Fabre F, Balthazart J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on hormones, brain and behaviour. Instaprint SA, Tours, pp 81–82Google Scholar
  17. Harcourt AH, Harcourt DE (1986) Vocalisations and social relationships of wild gorillas: a preliminary analysis. In: Taub DM, King FA (eds) Current perspectives in primate social dynamics. Van Nostrand Rheinhold, New York, pp 346–356Google Scholar
  18. Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (1987) Manipulation of food calls in captive chimpanzees: a preliminary report. Folia Primatol 48:207–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinrich B (1988) Food sharing in the raven, Corvus corax. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behaviour. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 285–311Google Scholar
  20. Janson CH (1990) Ecological consequences of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 40:922–934Google Scholar
  21. Kern MD, King JR (1972) Testosterone-induced singing in female white-crowned sparrows. Condor 74:204–209Google Scholar
  22. Ligon JD, Ligon SH (1990) Green woodhoopoes: life history traits and sociality. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 31–66Google Scholar
  23. Marzluff JM, Heinrich B (1991) Foraging by common ravens in the presence and absence of territory holders: an experimental analysis of social foraging. Anim Behav 42:755–770Google Scholar
  24. Palombit RA (1992) A preliminary study of vocal communication in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). II. Potential of calls to regulate intergroup spacing. Int J Primatol 13:183–207Google Scholar
  25. Plessis MA du (1989) The influence of roost-cavity availability on flock size in redbilled woodhoopoes. Ostrich [Suppl] 14:97–104Google Scholar
  26. Plessis MA du (1991) The role of helpers in feeding chicks in cooperatively breeding green (red-billed) woodhoopoes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:291–295Google Scholar
  27. Radford AN (2004a) Vocal co-ordination of group movement by green woodhoopoes. Ethology 110:11–20Google Scholar
  28. Radford AN (2004b) Voice breaking in males results in sexual dimorphism of green woodhoopoe calls. Behaviour (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Radford AN, Plessis MA du (2003) Bill dimorphism and foraging niche partitioning in the green woodhoopoe. J Anim Ecol 72:258–269Google Scholar
  30. Rice WR (1989) Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225Google Scholar
  31. Robinson JG (1981) Spatial structure of foraging groups of wedge-capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus nigrivittatus). Anim Behav 29:1036–1056Google Scholar
  32. Robinson JG (1982) Vocal systems regulating within-group spacing. In: Snowdon CT, Brown CH, Petersen MR (eds) Primate communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 94–116Google Scholar
  33. Snowdon CT (1988) Communication as social interaction: its importance in ontogeny and adult behaviour. In: Todt D, Goedeking P, Symmes D (eds) Primate vocal communication. Springer, Berlin Heildelberg New York, pp 108–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, Department of ZoologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations