Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 253–256 | Cite as

Sequential male mate choice in a fish, the Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil signifer

  • Bob B. M. Wong
  • Michael D. Jennions
  • J. Scott Keogh
Original Article

Abstract

Mate choice is not just a female preoccupation. Under some circumstances, males may also be choosy. However, studies of male mate choice have generally been confined to situations where males can make direct comparisons between potential partners. In contrast, sequential male mate choice has largely been overlooked despite its biologically importance, especially if current investment in mate attraction diminishes a male’s future mating opportunities. Using the Pacific blue-eye fish Pseudomugil signifer, we show that males are capable of exercising sequential mate choice. When presented sequentially with large and small females, males spent more effort courting the former. However, males did not appear to modify the time spent courting a given female based on the size of the female encountered previously. We suggest that greater attention to the sequential choice problem in males may help illuminate similarities and differences between the sexes when it comes to mating decisions.

Keywords

Male mate choice Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil signifer Sequential mate choice Sexual selection 

References

  1. Bakker TCM, Milinski M (1991) Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:205–210Google Scholar
  2. Bakker TCM, Rowland WJ (1995) Male mating preference in sticklebacks: effects of repeated testing and own attractiveness. Behaviour 132:936–949Google Scholar
  3. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368Google Scholar
  4. Bateman PW, Gilson LN, Ferguson JWH (2001) Male size and sequential mate preference in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Anim Behav 61:631–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev 76:305–339Google Scholar
  6. Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2001) Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:729–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Forbes MR, Boates JS, McNeil NL, Brison AE (1996) Mate searching by males of the intertidal amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas). Can J Zool 74:1479–1484Google Scholar
  8. Griffith SC, Sheldon BC (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of sexually selected traits: neglected components of variation. Anim Behav 61:987–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenkins JR, Rowland WJ (1997) Learning influences courtship preferences of male threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) Ethology 103:954–965Google Scholar
  10. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327Google Scholar
  11. Judge KA, Brooks RJ (2001) Chorus participation by male bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana: a test of the energetic constraints hypothesis. Anim Behav 62:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotiaho JS (2001) Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Biol Rev 76:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Milinski M (2001) The economics of sequential mate choice in sticklebacks. In: Dugatkin LA (ed) Model systems in behavioral ecology: integrating conceptual, theoretical and empirical approaches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp 245–264Google Scholar
  14. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1992) Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 250:229–233Google Scholar
  15. Pitcher TE, Neff BD, Rodd FH, Rowe L (2003) Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1623–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Real L (1990) Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136:376–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rowland WJ (1982) Mate choice by male sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 30:1093–1098Google Scholar
  18. Rowland WJ (1989) The ethological basis of mate choice in male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 38:112–120Google Scholar
  19. Saethers SA, Fiske P, Kålås JA (2001) Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2097–2102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Verrell PA (1995) Males choose larger females as mates in the salamander Desmognathus santeelah. Ethology 99:162–171Google Scholar
  21. Wong BBM (2004) Superior fighters make mediocre fathers in the Pacific blue-eye fish. Anim Behav 67:583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wong BBM, Jennions MD (2003) Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc R Soc Lond B [Suppl] 270:s36–s38 (DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0003)Google Scholar
  23. Wong BBM, Keogh JS, Jennions MD (2004) Mate recognition in a freshwater fish: geographic distance, genetic differentiation, and variation in female preference for local over foreign males. J Evol Biol (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bob B. M. Wong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael D. Jennions
    • 1
  • J. Scott Keogh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Botany and ZoologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Boston University Marine ProgramUSA

Personalised recommendations