Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 415–430

A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting

Review

Abstract

Avian duets are striking for the remarkable precision with which duetting partners sometimes coordinate their songs. Duetting species are taxonomically diverse, and the form of their duets varies. The reasons some birds duet when most do not remains unclear despite numerous hypotheses for its function. I review work done so far on duetting, discuss evidence for and against hypotheses for its functions, and highlight approaches useful for future research. The four hypotheses that appear most promising are that individuals join their partners’ songs to form duets: (1) to avoid being usurped from a partnership, (2) to prevent their partner being usurped, (3) as a collaborative display in defence of some resource, or (4) to signal commitment to their partner. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive, and duetting is likely to have multiple roles both within and among species. However, much basic research is still required. Characteristics of duets have rarely been quantified in detail, and information about variability among species in the precision of duetting is necessary, not only to test hypotheses about function, but also to define duetting more precisely. Quantifying the relative frequencies of alternative vocal strategies (for example, remaining silent when a partner sings versus joining in to form a duet) between species and in different contexts will help to determine why partners coordinate their songs to form duets. Furthermore, social systems and sex roles in duetting species are poorly understood, yet understanding these is critical to determining the functions of avian duetting.

Keywords

Avian duetting Hypotheses 

References

  1. Appleby BM, Yamaguchi N, Johnson PJ, MacDonald DW (1999) Sex specific territorial responses in tawny owls Strix aluco. Ibis 141:91–99Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong EA (1947) Bird display and behaviour. Lindsay & Drummond, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong EA (1963) A study of bird song. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrowood PC (1988) Duetting, pair bonding and agonistic display in parakeet pairs. Behaviour 106:129–157Google Scholar
  5. Bailey WJ (2003) Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution. Physiol Entomol 28:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baptista LF (1978) Territorial, courtship and duet songs of the Cuban grassquit (Tiaris canora). J Ornithol 119:91–101Google Scholar
  7. Black JM (1996) Introduction: pair bonds and partnerships. In: Black JM (ed) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  8. Black JM, Owen M (1988) Variations in pair bond and agonistic behaviors in barnacle geese on the wintering grounds. In: Weller MW (ed) Waterfowl in winter. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn., pp 39–57Google Scholar
  9. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Brenowitz EA, Arnold AP, Levin RN (1985) Neural correlates of female song in tropical duetting birds. Brain Res 343:104–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown RN, Lemon RE (1979) Structure and evolution of song form in the wrens Thryothorus sinaloa and T. felix. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:111–131Google Scholar
  12. Catchpole CK (1996) Song and female choice—good genes and big brains. Trends Ecol Evol 11:358–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng MF (1992) For whom does the female dove coo—a case for the role of vocal self-stimulation. Anim Behav 43:1035–1044Google Scholar
  14. Cobb NA (1897) The sheep-fluke. Agric Gaz NSW 8:470–480Google Scholar
  15. Dabelsteen T, McGregor PK (1996) Dynamic acoustic communication and interactive playback. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 398–408Google Scholar
  16. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Diamond JM, Terborgh JW (1968) Dual singing by New Guinea birds. Auk 85:62–82Google Scholar
  18. Dilger WC (1953) Duetting in the crimson-breasted barbet. Condor 55:220–221Google Scholar
  19. Farabaugh SM (1982) The ecological and social significance of duetting. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 85–124Google Scholar
  20. Farabaugh SM (1983) A comparative study of duet song in tropical Thryothorus wrens. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  21. Fleischer RC, Tarr CL, Morton ES, Sangmeister A, Derrickson KC (1997) Mating system of the dusky antbird, a tropical passerine, as assessed by DNA fingerprinting. Condor 99:512–514Google Scholar
  22. Galeotti P, Pavan G (1993) Differential responses of territorial tawny owls Strix aluco to the hooting of neighbours and strangers. Ibis 135:300–304Google Scholar
  23. Geissmann T (1999) Duet songs of the siamang, Hylobates syndactylus: II. Testing the pair-bonding hypothesis during a partner exchange. Behaviour 136:1005–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grafe TU, Bitz JH (2003) The functions of duetting in the tropical boubou (Laniarius aethiopicus): experimental evidence for territorial defence and mutual mate-guarding. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Grafe TU, Bitz JH, Wink M (2003) Song repertoire and duetting behaviour of the tropical boubou (Laniarius aethiopicus): implications for the functions of duetting. Anim Behav (in press)Google Scholar
  26. Greenfield MD (1994) Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of signal interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:97–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimes L (1965) Antiphonal singing in Laniarius barbarus and the auditory reaction time. Ibis 107:101–104Google Scholar
  28. Hall ML (1999) The importance of pair duration and biparental care to reproductive success in the monogamous Australian magpie-lark. Aust J Zool 47:439–454Google Scholar
  29. Hall ML (2000) The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation, or commitment? Anim Behav 60:667–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall ML (2001) Duetting and parental care in Australian magpie-larks. PhD thesis, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall ML, Magrath RD (2000) Duetting and mate-guarding in Australian magpie-larks (Grallina cyanoleuca). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harcus JL (1977) The functions of vocal duetting in some African birds. Z Tierpsychol 43:23–45Google Scholar
  33. Helversen D von (1980) Structure and function of antiphonal duets. Proc Int Ornithol Congr Berl 17:682–688Google Scholar
  34. Hooker T, Hooker BI (1969) Duetting. In: Hinde RA (ed) Bird vocalisations. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 185–205Google Scholar
  35. Hultsch H, Todt D (1984) Spatial proximity between allies: a territorial signal tested in the monogamous duet singer Cossypha heuglini. Behaviour 91:286–293Google Scholar
  36. Komdeur J, Kraaijeveld-Smit F, Kraaijeveld K, Edelaar P (1999) Explicit experimental evidence for the role of mate guarding in minimizing loss of paternity in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:2075–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kraaijeveld K, Mulder RA (2002) The function of triumph ceremonies in the black swan. Behaviour 139:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Kroodsma DE (1976) Reproductive development in a female songbird: differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science 192:574–575Google Scholar
  40. Kunkel P (1974) Mating systems of tropical birds: the effects of weakness or absence of external reproduction-timing factors with special reference to prolonged pair bonds. Z Tierpsychol 34:265–307Google Scholar
  41. Lamprecht J, Kaiser A, Peters A, Kirchgessner C (1985) Distance call duets in bar-headed geese (Anser indicus): co-operation through visual relief of the partner? Z Tierpsychol 70:211–218Google Scholar
  42. Langmore NE (1998) Functions of duet and solo songs of female birds. Trends Ecol Evol 13:136–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langmore NE (2002) Vocal duetting: definitions, discoveries and directions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:451–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lawless SG, Ritchison G, Klatt PH, Westneat DF (1997) The mating strategies of Eastern screech-owls—a genetic analysis. Condor 99:213–217Google Scholar
  45. Levin RN (1988) The adaptive significance of antiphonal song in the bay wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  46. Levin RN (1996a) Song behaviour and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. I. Removal experiments. Anim Behav 52:1093–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin RN (1996b) Song behaviour and reproductive strategies in a duetting wren, Thryothorus nigricapillus. II. Playback experiments. Anim Behav 52:1107–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewis AD (1982) Form and function of the duetting of the yellow-breasted apalis Apalis flavida. Scopus 6:95–100Google Scholar
  49. Malacarne G, Cucco M, Camanni S (1991) Coordinated visual displays and vocal duetting in different ecological situations among Western Palearctic non-passerine birds. Ethol Ecol Evol 3:207–219Google Scholar
  50. Mann NI, Marshall-Ball L, Slater PJB (2003) The complex song duet of the plain wren. Condor 105:672–682Google Scholar
  51. Margoliash D (1997) Functional organization of forebrain pathways for song production and perception. J Neurobiol 33:671–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Maynard Smith J, Harper DGC (1995) Animal signals—models and terminology. J Theor Biol 177:305–311Google Scholar
  53. McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGregor PK (1992) Quantifying responses to playback: one, many, or composite multivariate measures? In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication, vol 228. Plenum, New York, pp 79–96Google Scholar
  55. Morton ES (1980) The ecological background for the evolution of vocal sounds used at close range. In: Nohring R (ed) Acta XVII Congr Int Ornithol. Verlag Deutsche Ornithol.-Gesellschaft, Berlin, pp 737–741Google Scholar
  56. Morton ES (1996) A comparison of vocal behavior among tropical and temperate passerine birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 258–268Google Scholar
  57. Morton ES, Derrickson KC (1996) Song ranging by the dusky antbird, Cercomacra tyrannina—ranging without song learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morton ES, Derrickson KC, Stutchbury BJM (2000) Territory switching behavior in a sedentary tropical passerine, the dusky antbird (Cercomacra tyrannina). Behav Ecol 11:648–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mulder RA, Bishop H, Cooper M, Dennis S, Koetsveld M, Marshall J, Saunders BL, Langmore NE (2003) Alternate functions for duet and solo songs in magpie-larks, Grallina cyanoleuca. Aust J Zool 51:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J (1998) Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool 38:179–190Google Scholar
  61. Payne RB (1971) Duetting and chorus singing in African birds. Ostrich [Suppl] 9:125–146Google Scholar
  62. Payne RB, Skinner NJ (1970) Temporal patterns of duetting in African barbets. Ibis 112:173–183Google Scholar
  63. Power DM (1966) Antiphonal duetting and evidence for auditory reaction time in the orange-chinned parakeet. Auk 83:314–319Google Scholar
  64. Reyer H-U, Schmidl D (1988) Helpers have little to laugh about: group structure and vocalisation in the laughing kookaburra Dacelo novaeguineae. Emu 88:150–160Google Scholar
  65. Riebel K (2003) The ‘mute’ sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv Stud Behav 33 (in press)Google Scholar
  66. Roberts G, Sherratt TN (1998) Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature 394:175–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Robertson BC, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J, Moritz CC (2001) Genetic monogamy in the absence of paternity guards: the Capricorn silvereye, Zosterops lateralis chlorocephalus, on Heron Island. Behav Ecol 12:666–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robinson A (1949) The biological significance of bird song in Australia. Emu 48:291–315Google Scholar
  69. Schwabl H, Sonnenschein E (1992) Antiphonal duetting and sex hormones in the tropical bush shrike Laniarius funebris. Horm Behav 26:295–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Seddon N (2002) The structure, context and possible functions of solos, duets and choruses in the subdesert mesite (Monias benschi). Behaviour 139:645–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seddon N, Butchart SHM, Odling-Smee L (2002) Duetting in the subdesert mesite Monias benschi: evidence for acoustic mate defence? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Seibt U, Wickler W (1977) Duettieren als Revier-Anzeige bei Vogeln. Z Tierpsychol 43:180–187Google Scholar
  73. Seibt U, Wickler W, Kleindienst HU, Sonnenschein E (2002) Structure, geography and origin of dialects in the traditive song of the forest weaver Ploceus bicolor sclateri in Natal, S. Africa. Behaviour 139:1237–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Serpell JA (1981) Duetting in birds and primates: a question of function. Anim Behav 29:963–965Google Scholar
  75. Sherratt TN, Roberts G (2002) The stability of cooperation involving variable investment. J Theor Biol 215:47–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Short LL, Horne JFM (1983) A review of duetting, sociality and speciation in some African barbets (Capitonidae). Condor 85:323–332Google Scholar
  77. Sibley CG, Monroe BJ (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  78. Slater PJB, Gil D, Barlow CR, Graves JA (2002) Male-led duets in the moho, Hypergerus atriceps, and yellow-crowned gonolek, Laniarius barbarus. Ostrich 73:49–51Google Scholar
  79. Smith WJ (1994) Animal duets: forcing a mate to be attentive. J Theor Biol 166:221–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Snow DW (1977) Duetting and other synchronised displays of the blue-backed manakins, Chiroxiphia spp. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins CM (eds) Evolutionary ecology. Macmillan, London, pp 239–251Google Scholar
  81. Sonnenschein E, Reyer HU (1983) Mate-guarding and other functions of antiphonal duets in the slate-coloured boubou (Laniarius funebris). Z Tierpsychol 63:112–140Google Scholar
  82. Stacey PB, Koenig WD (1990) Cooperative breeding in birds: long-term studies of ecology and behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  83. Stiles FG, Skutch AF (1989) A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  84. Stokes AW, Williams HW (1968) Antiphonal calling in quail. Auk 85:83–89Google Scholar
  85. Thorpe WH (1963) Antiphonal singing in birds as evidence for avian auditory reaction time. Nature 197:774–776Google Scholar
  86. Thorpe WH (1972) Duetting and antiphonal song in birds: its extent and significance. Behaviour [Suppl] 18:1–197Google Scholar
  87. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433Google Scholar
  88. Tingay SR (1974) Antiphonal song in the magpie-lark. Emu 74:11–17Google Scholar
  89. Todt D (1975) Effect of territorial conditions on the maintenance of pair contact in duetting birds. Experientia 31:648–649Google Scholar
  90. Todt D, Hultch H, Duvall FP (1981) Behavioural significance and social function of vocal and non-vocal displays in the monogamous duet-singer Cossypha heuglini H. Zool Beitr 27:421–448Google Scholar
  91. Todt D, Hultsch H (1982) Impairment of vocal signal exchange in the monogamous duet-singer Cossypha heuglini (Turdidae): effects on pair bond maintenance. Z Tierpsychol 60:265–274Google Scholar
  92. Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: The use of song as a model in communication. Adv Stud Behav 29:247–296Google Scholar
  93. Trainer JM, McDonald DB (1995) Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Trainer JM, McDonald DB, Learn WA (2002) The development of coordinated singing in cooperatively displaying long-tailed manakins. Behav Ecol 13:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vehrencamp SL (2001) Is song-type matching a conventional signal of aggressive intentions? Proc R Soc London B 268:1637–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vencl F, Soucek B (1976) Structure and control of duet singing in white-crested laughing thrush, (Garrulax leucolophus). Behaviour 57:206–226Google Scholar
  97. Wachtmeister CA (2001) Display in monogamous pairs: a review of empirical data and evolutionary explanations. Anim Behav 61:861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Watson J (2002) Starting small and commitment. Games Econ Behav 38:176–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Watson M (1969) Significance of antiphonal song in the Eastern whipbird, Psophodes olivaceus. Behaviour 35:157–178Google Scholar
  100. Whitford PC (1996) Temporal alteration and coordination of calls by paired Canada geese in duetted calling of aggression, territorial and triumph behavior. Passenger Pigeon 58:249–258Google Scholar
  101. Whittingham LA, Kirkconnell A, Ratcliffe LM (1992) Differences in song and sexual dimorphism between Cuban and North American red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Auk 109:928–933Google Scholar
  102. Whittingham LA, Kirkconnell A, Ratcliffe LM (1996) Breeding behavior, social organization and morphology of red-shouldered (Agelaius assimilis) and tawny-shouldered (A. humeralis) blackbirds. Condor 98:832–836Google Scholar
  103. Whittingham LA, Kirkconnell A, Ratcliffe LM (1997) The context and function of duet and solo songs in the red-shouldered blackbird. Wilson Bull 109:279–289Google Scholar
  104. Wickler W (1976) Duetting songs in birds: biological significance of stationary and non-stationary processes. J Theor Biol 61:493–497Google Scholar
  105. Wickler W (1980) Vocal duetting and the pair bond. I. Coyness and partner commitment. A hypothesis. Z Tierpsychol 52:201–209Google Scholar
  106. Wickler W, Seibt U (1980) Vocal duetting and the pair bond. II. Unisono duetting in the African forest weaver, Symplectes bicolor. Z Tierpsychol 52:217–226Google Scholar
  107. Wickler W, Seibt U (1982) Song splitting in the evolution of duetting. Z Tierpsychol 59:127–140Google Scholar
  108. Wickler W, Sonnenschein E (1989) Ontogeny of song in captive duet-singing slate coloured boubous (Laniarius funebris). A study in birdsong epigenesis. Behaviour 111:220–233Google Scholar
  109. Wiley RH, Wiley MS (1977) Recognition of neighbours’ duets by stripe-backed wrens Campylorhynchus nuchalis. Behaviour 62:10–34Google Scholar
  110. Yamaguchi A (1998) Can a sexually dimorphic learned birdsong be used for male–female recognition? Behaviour 135:833–844Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Botany and ZoologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Bioacoustics Cornell Laboratory of OrnithologyIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations