Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 140–148 | Cite as

Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion

  • Julia Fischer
  • Dawn M. Kitchen
  • Robert M. Seyfarth
  • Dorothy L. Cheney
Original Article

Abstract

Free-ranging adult male baboons give loud two-syllable ‘wahoo’ calls during dawn choruses, interactions between groups, when chasing females, and in aggressive interactions with other males. Previous research has shown that the rate and duration of these contest wahoos are correlated with a male’s competitive ability: high-ranking males call more often, call at faster rates, and call for longer bouts than do low-ranking males. Here we report that acoustic features of wahoos also reveal information about male competitive ability. High-ranking males give wahoos with higher fundamental frequencies (F0) and longer ‘hoo’ syllables. Within-subject analyses revealed that, as males fall in rank, the hoo syllables tend to shorten within a period of months. As males age and continue to fall in rank, F0 declines, hoo syllables shorten, and formant dispersion decreases. Independent of age and rank, within bouts of calling F0 declines and hoo syllables become shorter. Because wahoos are often given while males are running or leaping through trees, variation in these acoustic features may function as an indicator of a male’s stamina. The acoustic features of contest wahoos thus potentially allow listeners to assess a male’s competitive ability.

Keywords

Vocal communication Baboons Honest signalling Male quality Loud calls 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Office of the President and the Department of Wildlife and National Parks of the Republic of Botswana for permission to conduct research in the Moremi Wildlife Reserve. Jim Nicholson, Kurt Hammerschmidt, Mokupi Mokupi, and Keena Seyfarth assisted with data collection. Ryne Palombit kindly made some of his recordings available for analysis. We are grateful to Dana Pfefferle for support with the acoustic analysis, and Daniel Stahl for statistical advice. Three anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fi 707/2; 707/4), and by National Science Foundation grant IBN 9514001, National Institutes of Health grants MH62249, the Leakey Foundation, and the Research Foundation of the University of Pennsylvania. This research complies with the laws of the Republic of Botswana and was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Pennsylvania.

References

  1. Bee MA (2002) Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size-related variation in acoustic signals. Behav Ecol 13:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bee MA, Perrill SA, Owen PC (1999) Size assessment in simulated territorial encounters between male green frogs (Rana clamitans). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan KL, Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Bryant DM, Rowe LV (2001) Testosterone influences basal metabolic rate in male house sparrows: a new cost of dominance signalling? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 268:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulger J (1993) Dominance rank and access to estrous females in male savanna baboons. Behaviour 124:89–122Google Scholar
  5. Buskirk WH, Buskirk RE, Hamilton WJ (1974) Troop-mobilizing behavior of adult male chacma baboons. Folia Primatol 22:9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1977) Behaviour of adult and immature male baboons during inter-group encounters. Nature 269:404–406Google Scholar
  7. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Silk JB (1995) The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons. Anim Behav 50:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1979) Roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour 69:145–170Google Scholar
  9. Davies NB, Halliday TR (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads (Bufo bufo). Nature 274:683–685Google Scholar
  10. Dobson AJ (2002) An introduction to the generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.Google Scholar
  11. Fant G (1960) Acoustic theory of speech production. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer J, Hammerschmidt K, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2002) Acoustic features of male baboon loud calls: influences of context, age, and individuality. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1465–1474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitch WT (1997) Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. J Acoust Soc Am 102:1213–1222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitch WT, Hauser MD (2003) Unpacking honesty: generating and extracting information from acoustic signals. In: Simmons AM, Popper AN, Fay, RR (eds) Animal communication. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Grafen A (1990) Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol 144:473–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall KRL, DeVore I (1965) Baboon social behavior. In: DeVore, I (ed) Primate behavior: field studies of monkeys and apes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 53–110Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton WJ, Bulger JB (1990) Natal male baboon rank rises and successful challenges to resident alpha males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:357–363Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton WJ, Buskirk RE, Buskirk WH (1976) Defense of space and resources by chacma (Papio ursinus) baboon troops in an African desert and swamp. Ecology 57:1264–1272Google Scholar
  19. Hammerschmidt K (1990) Individuelle Lautmuster bei Berberaffen (Macaca sylvanus): Ein Ansatz zum Verständnis ihrer vokalen Kommunikation. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochfeld Y (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75:800–802Google Scholar
  21. Hsiao T, Solomon NP, Luschei ES, Titze IR, Kang L, Fu T, Hsu M (1994) Effect of subglottic pressure on fundamental frequency of the canine larynx with active muscle tensions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:817–821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kitchen DM, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2003a) Female baboons’ responses to male loud calls. Ethology 109:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitchen DM, Seyfarth RM, Fischer J, Cheney DL (2003b) Loud calls as indicators of dominance in male baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:374–384Google Scholar
  24. Kitchen DM, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (2003c) Factors mediating inter-group encounters in savanna baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) Behaviour (in press)Google Scholar
  25. Lienard JS, Di Benedetto MG (1999) Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 106:411–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Markel JD, Gray AH (1976) Linear prediction of speech. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith J (1994) Must reliable signals always be costly? Anim Behav 47:1115–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mundry R (1999) Testing related samples with missing values: a permutation approach. Anim Behav 58:1143–1153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Noordwijk MA van, van Schaik CP (2001) Career moves: transfer and rank challenge decisions by male long-tailed macaques. Behaviour 138:359–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ohala JJ (1984) An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica 41:1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Owren MJ, Linker C (1995) Some analysis methods that may be useful to acoustic Primatologists. In: Zimmermann E, Newman JD, Jürgens U (eds) Current topics in primate vocal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  33. Owren MJ, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1997) The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functions. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2951–2963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Palombit RA, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL (1997) The adaptive value of ‘friendships’ to female baboons: experimental and observational evidence. Anim Behav 54:599–614Google Scholar
  35. Palombit R, Cheney D, Seyfarth R, Rendall D, Silk J, Johnson S, Fischer J (2000) Male infanticide and defense of infants in chacma baboons. In: van Schaik C, Janson C (eds) Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 123–152Google Scholar
  36. Pfefferle D, Fischer J (2003) Sounds and size—identification of variables that reflect body size in Hamadryas baboons. Folia Primatol 74:212Google Scholar
  37. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effect models in S and S-Plus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Reby D, McComb K (2003) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Anim Behav 65:519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross K (1987) Okavango: jewel of the Kalahari. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saayman GS (1971) Behaviour of adult males in a troop of free-ranging chacma baboons. Folia Primatol 15:36–57Google Scholar
  42. Schrader L, Hammerschmidt K (1997) Computer-aided analysis of acoustic parameters in animal vocalizations: a multi-parametric approach. Bioacoustics 7:247–265Google Scholar
  43. Shaffer JP (1995) Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol 46:561–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Silk JB, Kaldor E, Boyd R (2000) Cheap talk when interests conflict. Anim Behav 59:423–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas RJ (2002) The costs of singing in nightingales. Anim Behav 63:959–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Duyse E, Pinxten R, Eens M (2002) Effects of testosterone on song, aggression, and nestling feeding behavior in male great tits, Parus major. Hormon Behav 41:178–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vehrencamp S (2000) Handicap, index, and conventional elements of bird song. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Publishers, Trondheim, Norway, pp 277–300Google Scholar
  48. Wingfield JC, Lynn SE, Soma KK (2001) Avoiding the ‘costs’ of testosterone: ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions. Brain Behav Evol 57:239–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Fischer
    • 1
  • Dawn M. Kitchen
    • 2
  • Robert M. Seyfarth
    • 2
  • Dorothy L. Cheney
    • 3
  1. 1.Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations