Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 236–241 | Cite as

Social status in relation to Sindbis virus infection clearance in greenfinches

Original Article

Abstract

The ability to resist infections can differ between individuals of different social rank. This study investigates if the clearance of an avian virus infection (Sindbis virus) was related to the social status of greenfinches (Carduelis chloris) and if infected birds would decline in social status. The results showed that virus clearance patterns were related to social status. Within groups of birds with similar plumage color (a social status signal), body mass and age, a bird’s social status could be used to predict virus clearance patterns. Dominant birds had higher virus concentrations early in the infection and lower virus titres during later stages of the infection as compared to birds that were subordinates. The infection had no significant effect on previously established social ranks, and ranks that were established during the infection did not appear to be influenced by a bird’s infection status. In conclusion, this study exemplifies a case where the social rank of an individual was a predictor of the ability to clear a viral infection. The underlying physiological mechanisms of this relationship remain to be further investigated.

Keywords

Carduelis chloris Greenfinch Sindbis virus Social status Virus clearance patterns 

References

  1. Biron CA (1999) Initial and innate responses to viral infections- pattern setting in immunity or disease. Curr Opin Microbiol 2:374–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchner A, Erdfelder E, Faul F (1997) How to use G-Power. http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/aap/projects/gpower/how_to_use_gpower.html. Cited 6 October 2003
  3. Buchanan K (2000) Stress and the evolution of condition-dependent signals. Trends Ecol Evol 15:156–160Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain RW, Sudia WD (1961) Mechanisms of transmission of viruses by mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol 6:371.390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol 8. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Creel, S (2001) Social dominance and stress. Trends Ecol Evol 16:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Earley E, Peralta PH, Johnson KM (1967) A plaque neutralization method for arboviruses. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 125:741–747Google Scholar
  8. Ekman J, Hake MK (1990) Monitoring starvation risk: adjustments of body reserves in greenfinches (Carduelis chloris L.) during periods of unpredictable food supply. Behav Ecol 1:62–67Google Scholar
  9. Eley C (1991) Status signalling in the western greenfinch, Carduelis chloris. PhD thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K.Google Scholar
  10. Evans MR, Goldsmith AR, Norris SRA (2000) The effect of testosterone on antibodyproduction and plumage coloration in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Francy DB, Jaenson TGT, Lundström JO, Schildt E-B, Espmark Å, Henriksson B, Niklasson B (1989) Ecologic studies of mosquitoes and birds as hosts of Ockelbo virus in Sweden and isolation of Inkoo and Batai viruses from mosquitoes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 41:355–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeland WJ (1981) Parasitism and behavioral dominance among male mice. Science 213:461–462Google Scholar
  14. Hake M (1996) Fattening strategies in dominance-structured greenfinch (Carduelis chloris) flocks in winter. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klasing KC (1998) Nutritional modulation of resistance to infectious diseases. Poult Sci 77:1119–1125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindström KM, Lundström JO (2000) Male greenfinches with brighter ornaments have higher virus infection clearance rates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindström KM, Krakower DS, Lundström JO, Silverin B (2001) The effect of testosterone on a viral infection in greenfinches (Carduelis chloris): an experimental test of the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindström KM, van der Veen IT, Lundström JO, Legault B-A (2003) Activity and predator escape performance of Greenfinches infected with Sindbis virus. Ardea 91:103–111Google Scholar
  20. Lundström JO (1999) Mosquito-borne viruses in Western Europe: a review. J Vect Ecol 24:1–39Google Scholar
  21. Lundström JO, Niklasson B, Francy BD (1990) Swedish Culex torrentium and Cx. pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) as experimental vectors of Ockelbo virus. J Med Entomol 27:561–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Merilä J, Sheldon BC, Lindström K (1999) Plumage brightness in relation to hematozoan infections in the Greenfinch, Carduelis chloris: bright males are a good bet. Ecoscience 6:1-7Google Scholar
  23. Niklasson B, Espmark Å, Lundström J (1988) Occurrence of arthralgia and specific IgM antibodies three to four years after Ockelbo disease. J Infect Dis 157:832–835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Norder H, Lundström JO, Kozuch O, Magnius LO (1996) Genetic relatedness of Sindbis virus strains from Europe, Middle East and Africa. Virology 222:440-445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Olson VA, Owens IPF (1998) Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol Evol 13:510–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poiani A, Goldsmith AR, Evans MR (2000) Ectoparasites of house sparrows (Passer domesticus): an experimental test of the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:230–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pusey AE, Packer C (1997) The ecology of relationships. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp 254–284Google Scholar
  28. Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501Google Scholar
  29. Rohwer S (1975) The social significance of avian plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610Google Scholar
  30. Saks L, Ots I, Horak P (2003) Carotenoid-based plumage coloration of male greenfinches reflects health and immunocompetence. Oecologia 134:301–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Senar JC (1990) Agonistic communication in social species: what is communicated? Behaviour 112:270–283Google Scholar
  32. Wingfield JC, Hegner RE, Dufty AM, Ball GF (1990) The “challenge hypothesis”: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. Am Nat 136:829–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zuk M, Johnsen TS (2000) Social environment and immunity in the red jungle fowl. Behav Ecol 11:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuk M, Kim T, Robinson SI, Johnsen TS (1998) Parasites influence social rank and morphology, but not mate choice, in female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Anim Behav 56:493–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evolutionary Biology Center, Department of Population BiologyUppsala University752 36 UppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations