Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 87–94 | Cite as

Effect of food location and quality on recruitment sounds and success in two stingless bees, Melipona mandacaia and Melipona bicolor

  • James C. Nieh
  • Felipe A. L. Contrera
  • Juliana Rangel
  • Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca
Original Article

Abstract

It is unclear whether stingless bees in the genus Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) can reliably encode the distance to a food source through recruitment sounds produced inside the nest, in part because the sound features correlated with distance also vary with food quality. We therefore trained marked foragers of two species, Melipona mandacaia and M. bicolor, to feeders at different distances and to different sucrose concentrations at the same distance. In both species, foragers successfully recruited to a rich 2.5-m food source and produced pulsed recruitment sounds in which pulse duration was significantly and positively correlated with distance to the rich food source. When returning from poorer food sources (0.6–1.5 m), foragers of both species decreased sound production, producing shorter sound pulses and longer sound interpulses than they did for 2.5 m food located at the same distance. Thus the temporal structure of M. mandacaia and M. bicolor recruitment sounds varies with distance and food quality. However, nestmates were not recruited by performances for poorer food sources (0.6–1.5 m), whose sucrose concentration was sufficiently low to affect recruitment sounds. Surprisingly, the interphase (the time between behavioral phases that communicate location) also increases with decreasing food quality in the closely related honeybees (Apis), suggesting a potential homology in the effect of food quality on the recruitment systems of Apis and Melipona. We explore the evolutionary implications of these similarities.

Keywords

Distance encoding Food quality Stingless bees Recruitment Sound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Paulo Nogueira-Neto and the students, Kim Hong, Heather Hoover, Patrick O'Malley, Santiago Ramírez, Nik Sadler, and Jennifer Schofield, who have made the data collection and analyses possible. Melissa Thomas, David Roubik, Alvin Lyckman, Charles Michener, and anonymous reviewers contributed many valuable comments to this paper. The Walter F. Heiligenberg Endowment and FAPESP (proc. 99/10883-8 and proc. 02/00582-5) supported this research.

References

  1. Aguilar I, Briceño D (2002) Sounds in M. costaricensis (Apidae: Meliponini): effect of sugar concentration and nectar source distance. Apidologie 33:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesmeijer JC, Vries H de (2001) Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesmeijer JC, Nieuwstadt MGL van, Lukács S, Sommeijer MJ (1998) The role of internal and external information in foraging decisions of Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron SA, Mardulyn P (2001) Multiple molecular data sets suggest independent origins of highly eusocial behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Apinae). Syst Biol 50:194–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chittka L, Vorobyev M, Shmida A, Menzel R (1993) Bee colour vision: the optimal system for the discrimination of flower colours with three spectral photoreceptor types? In: Wiese K, Gibrakin F, Popov AV, Renninger G (ed) Advances in life sciences; sensory systems of arthropods. Birkhauser, Cambridge, Mass, pp 213–218Google Scholar
  6. De Marco RJ, Farina WM (2003) Trophallaxis in forager honeybees (Apis mellifera): resource uncertainty enhances begging contacts? J Comp Physiol A 189:125–134Google Scholar
  7. Dornhaus A, Cameron S (2003) A scientific note on food alert in Bombus transversalis. Apidologie 34:87–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dornhaus A, Chittka L (1999) Evolutionary origins of bee dances. Nature 401:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dornhaus A, Chittka L (2001) Food alert in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris): possible mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dyer FC (2002) The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol 47:917–949Google Scholar
  11. Esch HE (1967) Die Bedeutung der Lauterzeugung für die Verständigung der stachellosen Bienen. Z Vgl Physiol 56:408–411Google Scholar
  12. Esch HE, Zhang S, Srinivasan MV, Tautz J (2001) Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature 411:581–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees, 2nd edn. Belknap, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould JL (1975) Honey bee recruitment: The dance-language controversy. Science 189:685–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould JL (1976) The dance-language controversy. Q Rev Biol 51:211–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenfield MD (2002) Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauser MD (1996) The evolution of communication. MIT, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertel H, Ventura DF (1985) Spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors in the compound eye of stingless tropical bees. J Insect Physiol 31:931–935Google Scholar
  19. Hilário SD (1999) Considerações sobre a atividade de vôo das abelhas indígenas, com ênfase em Plebeia pugnax Moure (in lit.) e Melipona bicolor bicolor Lepetelier, 1836 (Apidae, Meliponinae). Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências. Universidade de São Paulo, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  20. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  21. Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2000) Recruitment behavior in stingless bees, Melipona scutellaris and M. quadrifasciata. II. Possible mechanisms of communication. Apidologie 31:93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hrncir M, Jarau S, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2002) Dependence of sound signals in Melipona seminigra with factors other than food location. In: Billen J (ed) XIV International Congress of IUSSI: the golden jubilee proceedings. Science Council of Japan, Entomological Society of Japan, Hokkaido University Coop, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, p 124Google Scholar
  23. Jarau S, Hrncir M, Zucchi R, Barth FG (2000) Recruitment behavior in stingless bee, Melipona scutellaris and M. quadrifasciata. I. Foraging at food sources differing in direction and distance. Apidologie 31:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lindauer M, Kerr WE (1958) Die gegenseitige Verständigung bei den stachellosen Bienen. Z Vgl Physiol 41:405–434Google Scholar
  25. Marler P, Evans CS, Hauser MD (1992) Animal signals: motivation, referential, or both? In: Papoucek M (ed) Nonverbal vocal communication: comparative and developmental approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 66–86Google Scholar
  26. Michelsen A (2003) Signals and flexibility in the dance communication of honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 189:165–174Google Scholar
  27. Michelsen A, Towne WF, Kirchner WH, Kryger P (1987) The acoustic near field of a dancing honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 158:605–611Google Scholar
  28. Michelsen A, Andersen BB, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1989) Honeybees can be recruited by a mechanical model of a dancing bee. Naturwissenschaften 76:277–280Google Scholar
  29. Michener CD (2000) The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  30. Morton ES (1977) On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat 111:855–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nieh JC (1998) The food recruitment dance of the stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:133–145Google Scholar
  32. Nieh JC, Roubik DW (1998) Potential mechanisms for the communication of height and distance by a stingless bee, Melipona panamica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:387–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nieh JC, Contrera FAL, Ramírez S, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL (in press) Variation in the ability to communicate 3-D resource location by stingless bees from different habitats. Anim BehavGoogle Scholar
  34. Rizzini CT (1997) Tratado de fitogeografia do Brasil, 2nd edn. Âmbito Cultural, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  35. Roubik DW (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Seeley TD (1985) The information-center strategy of honeybee foraging. In: Holldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology. Fischer, New York, pp 75–90Google Scholar
  37. Seeley TD (1987) The effectiveness of information about food sources by honey bee colonies. Anim Behav 35:1572–1575Google Scholar
  38. Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181–199Google Scholar
  39. Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS, Pagano GJ (2000) Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability. J Comp Physiol A 186:813–819Google Scholar
  40. Sherman G, Visscher PK (2002) Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing. Nature 419:920–922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Tautz J, Rohrseitz K, Sandeman D (1996) One-strided waggle dance in bees. Nature 382:32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Towne WF, Kirchner WH (1989) Hearing in honey bees: detection of air-particle oscillations. Science 244:686–688Google Scholar
  44. Waddington KD, Kirchner WH (1992) Acoustical and behavioral correlates of profitability of food sources in honey bee round dances. Ethology 92:1–6Google Scholar
  45. Wenner AM (1962) Sound production during the waggle dance of the honey bee. Anim Behav 10:79–95Google Scholar
  46. Wenner AM (2002) The elusive honey bee dance "language" hypothesis. Journal of Insect Behavior 15:859–878Google Scholar
  47. Wenner AM, Wells PH (1990) Anatomy of a controversy: the question of a language among bees. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Wenner AM, Wells PH, Johnson DL (1969) Honey bees: do they use the direction and distance information provided by their dancers? Science 158:1076–1077Google Scholar
  49. Winston ML, Michener CD (1977) Dual origin of highly social behavior among bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:1135–1137PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Nieh
    • 1
  • Felipe A. L. Contrera
    • 2
  • Juliana Rangel
    • 1
  • Vera L. Imperatriz-Fonseca
    • 2
  1. 1.Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution University of California San Diego La JollaUSA
  2. 2.Laboratório de Abelhas, Departamento de EcologiaUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations