Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 511–520 | Cite as

Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making

  • Thomas D. SeeleyEmail author
  • P. Kirk Visscher
Original Article


This study considers the mystery of how the scout bees in a honey bee swarm know when they have completed their group decision making regarding the swarm's new nest site. More specifically, we investigated how the scouts sense when it is appropriate for them to begin producing the worker piping signals that stimulate their swarm-mates to prepare for the flight to their new home. We tested two hypotheses: "consensus sensing," the scouts noting when all the bees performing waggle dances are advertising just one site; and "quorum sensing," the scouts noting when one site is being visited by a sufficiently large number of scouts. Our test involved monitoring four swarms as they discovered, recruited to, and chose between two nest boxes and their scouts started producing piping signals. We found that a consensus among the dancers was neither necessary nor sufficient for the start of worker piping, which indicates that the consensus sensing hypothesis is false. We also found that a buildup of 10–15 or more bees at one of the nest boxes was consistently associated with the start of worker piping, which indicates that the quorum sensing hypothesis may be true. In considering why the scout bees rely on reaching a quorum rather than a consensus as their cue of when to start preparing for liftoff, we suggest that quorum sensing may provide a better balance between accuracy and speed in decision making. In short, the bees appear to begin preparations for liftoff as soon as enough of the scout bees, but not all of them, have approved of one of the potential nest sites.


Apis mellifera Group decision making Honey bees Nest-site selection Quorum sensing 



The research reported here was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant IBN02–10541), the National Geographic Society (grant 7055–1), and the UCR Academic Senate. We thank Marjorie Martin for letting us keep our bees at her home at Kittery Point, Maine; Siobhan Cully for spending many hours monitoring the nest box overlooking Broad Cove; and Dr. James Morin for providing space and facilities at the Shoals Marine Laboratory. This is contribution no. 113 of the Shoals Marine Laboratory.


  1. Adam B (1987) Beekeeping at Buckfast Abbey. Northern Bee Books, Hebden BridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams ES (1990) Boundary disputes in the territorial ant Azteca trigona: effects of asymmetries in colony size. Anim Behav 39:321–328Google Scholar
  3. Beckers R, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Soc 37:258–267Google Scholar
  4. Biesmeijer JC, Ermers MCW (1999) Social foraging in stingless bees: how colonies of Melipona fasciata choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm C (1992) Segmentary 'warfare' and the management of conflict: comparison of East African chimpanzees and patrilineal–patrilocal humans. In: Harcourt AH, DeWall FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–173Google Scholar
  6. Boinski S, Garber PA (2000) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  8. Camazine S, Visscher PK, Finley J, Vetter RS (1999) House-hunting by honey bee swarms: collective decisions and individual behaviors. Insectes Soc 46:348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  10. Cole B, Trampus FI (1999) Activity cycles in ant colonies: worker interactions and decentralized control. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 289–308Google Scholar
  11. Combs GF (1972) The engorgement of swarming worker honeybees. J Apic Res 11:121–128Google Scholar
  12. Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, and Pasteels JM (1999) Decision-making in foraging by social insects. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 331–354Google Scholar
  13. Esch H (1967) The sounds produced by swarming honey bees. Z Vergl Physiol 56:408–411Google Scholar
  14. Franks NR, Fletcher CR (1983) Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration: Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:261–270Google Scholar
  15. Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman BW, and Tofts C (1992) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44:357–375Google Scholar
  16. Franks NR, Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Britton NF, Sumpter DJT (2002) Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 337:1567–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goss S, Aron S, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (1989) Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine Ant. Naturwissenschaften 76:579–581Google Scholar
  18. Heinrich B (1981) The mechanisms and energetics of honeybee swarm temperature regulation. J Exp Biol 91:25–55Google Scholar
  19. Hölldobler B (1982) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:301–314Google Scholar
  20. Jeanne RL (1996) Regulation of nest construction behaviour in Polybia occidentalis. Anim Behav 52:473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kummer H (1971) Primate societies: group techniques of ecological adaptation. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindauer M (1955) Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche. Z Vergl Physiol 37:263–324Google Scholar
  23. Mallon EB, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2001) Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin P (1963) Die Steuerung der Volksteilung beim Schwärmen der Bienen. Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Problem der Wanderschwärme. Insectes Soc 10:13–42Google Scholar
  25. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell C (1970) Weights of workers and drones. Am Bee J 110:468–469Google Scholar
  27. O'Donnell S, Jeanne RL (1990) Forager specialization and the control of nest repair in Polybia occidentalis Olivier (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:359–364Google Scholar
  28. Pratt SC (1998) Condition-dependent timing of comb construction by honeybee colonies: how do workers know when to start building? Anim Behav 56:603–610Google Scholar
  29. Pratt SC, Mallon EB, Sumpter DJT, Franks NR (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prins HHT (1996) Ecology and behaviour of the African buffalo: social inequality and decision making. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Schricker B (1965) Die Orientierung der Honigbiene in der Dämmerung. Z Vergl Physiol 49:420–458Google Scholar
  32. Seeley TD (1977) Measurement of nest cavity volume by the honey bee ( Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:201–227Google Scholar
  33. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  34. Seeley TD (2003) Consensus building during nest-site selection in honey bee swarms: the expiration of dissent. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:417–424Google Scholar
  35. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (1999) Group decision making in swarms of honey bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the "best-of-N" decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427Google Scholar
  37. Seeley TD, Tautz J (2001) Worker piping in honey bee swarms and its role in preparing for liftoff. J Comp Physiol A 187:667–676CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Seeley TD, Morse RA, Visscher PK (1979) The natural history of the flight of honey bee swarms. Psyche 86:103–113Google Scholar
  39. Seeley TD, Kleinhenz M, Bujok B, Tautz J (2003) Thorough warm-up before take-off in honey bee swarms. Naturwissenschaften 40:156–260Google Scholar
  40. Shapiro JA, Dworkin M (1997) Bacteria as multicellular organisms. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Strickland TR, Tofts CMN, Franks NR (1992) A path choice algorithm for ants. Naturwissenschaften 79:567–572Google Scholar
  42. Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg J-L (1999) The mechanisms and rules of coordinated building in social insects. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 309–330Google Scholar
  43. Visscher PK (2003) How self organization evolves. Nature 421:799–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Visscher PK, Camazine S (1999) The mystery of swarming honeybees: from individual behaviors to collective decisions. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 355–378Google Scholar
  45. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations