Skip to main content
Log in

Traction methods in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of femur shaft fractures: the double reverse traction repositor or manual traction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) and manual traction in retrograde intramedullary nailing (RE-IMN) for femoral shaft fractures.

Patients and methods

Seventy-seven patients with femur shaft fractures were randomized to undergo surgery with either DRTR or manual traction (MT) to facilitate RE-IMN between January 2018 and January 2019. Demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical data, post-operative complications, and functional outcomes were assessed. Data from 72 patients completing the final follow-up (12 months) were analysed in this study.

Results

The average number of intra-operative perspectives in the DRTR group was 27.7, which was significantly reduced compared with that in the MT group (31.3, p < 0.001). Fewer assistants were required in the DRTR group compared with the MT group (1.1 vs 1.9, p < 0.001). Fewer patients with open reduction were discovered in the DRTR group compared with the MT group (2.8 vs 19.4, p=0.024). Demographics, fracture characteristics, other surgical data, and prognostic parameters were comparative between the two groups.

Conclusions

The DRTR can be effectively and safely used to treat femur shaft fractures with RE-IMN. The DRTR achieves similar results as MT and is also superior to MT in terms of intra-operative perspectives, the number of assistants, and the open reduction rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang Y (2016) Clinical epidemiology of orthopaedic trauma. Thieme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bong M, Koval J (2006) The history of intramedullary nailing. Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases 64(3-4):94–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ricci M, Gallagher B, Haidukewych G (2009) Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: current concepts. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 17(5):296–305. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200905000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giannoudis P, Stavrou Z, Papakostidis C. (2014) Nailing of femoral shaft fractures. In European surgical orthopaedics and traumatology: the efort textbook, Bentley, Ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2677-2697.

  5. Papadokostakis G, Papakostidis C, Dimitriou R et al (2005) The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury 36(7):813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang F, Zhu L, Li Y et al (2015) Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin 31(10):1897–1902. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2015.1078783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricci W, Bellabarb C, Evanoff et al (2001) Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15(3):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200103000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu C, Singh V, Mariapan S et al (2007) Antegrade versus retrograde locked intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures: which is better? European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society 33(2):135–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-6156-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez E, Jahangir A, Mashru R et al (2007) Is there a gluteus medius tendon injury during reaming through a modified medial trochanteric portal? A cadaver study. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):617–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318157bda7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Helmy N, Jando V, Lu T et al (2008) Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 22(1):10–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815f5357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders D, MacLeod M, Charyk-Stewart T et al (2008) Functional outcome and persistent disability after isolated fracture of the femur. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie 51(5):366–370

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard J, Hanssen A (2007) Principles of a clean operating room environment. J Arthroplast 22(7 Suppl 3):6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufer H (1980) Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 146:53–61

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao K, Zhang J, Li J et al. (2020). Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nailing antirotation: traction table or double reverse traction repositor. Journal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research, 1–7. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1786610.

  15. Li S, Yin Y, Zhang R et al (2019) Minimally invasive treatment for fractures of lower extremity amputees using a rapid reductor. Int Orthop 43(6):1473–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4072-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li D, Song D, Ni J et al (2017) A case report of Schatzker type VI tibial plateau fracture treated with double reverse traction closed reduction combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique: a case report. Medicine 96(45):e8394. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008394

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen W, Zhang T, Wang J et al (2016) Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a rapid reductor and intramedullary nail fixation. Int Orthop 40(1):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2829-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang R, Yin Y, Li S et al (2018) Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures. Sci Rep 8(1):5952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Somford M, Bekerom M, Kloen P (2013) Operative treatment for femoral shaft nonunions, a systematic review of the literature. Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction 8(2):77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11751-013-0168-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris H (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kremer E, Atkinson J, Ignelzi R (1981) Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 10(2):241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10(3):150–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658201000306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brewster J, Grenie G, Taylor B et al (2020) Long-term comparison of retrograde and antegrade femoral nailing. Orthopedics 43(4):e278–e282. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20200415-04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar P, Neradi D, Kansal R et al (2019) Greater trochanteric versus piriformis fossa entry nails for femur shaft fractures: resolving the controversy. Injury 50(10):1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.07.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Şahin E, Songür M, Kalem M et al (2016) Traction table versus manual traction in the intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Injury 47(7):1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burgers P, Hoogendoorn M, Van Woensel E et al (2016) Total medical costs of treating femoral neck fracture patients with hemi- or total hip arthroplasty: a cost analysis of a multicenter prospective study. Osteoporos Int 27(6):1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3484-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis B (2005) Factors affecting rates of infection and nonunion in intramedullary nailing. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume 87(4):589–590. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.16232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrop J, Styliaras J, Ooi Y et al (2012) Contributing factors to surgical site infections. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 20(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-02-094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank JL Guo of the Department of Orthopaedics of Statistics and Applications for their generous assistance.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

The study was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFC0120600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YZ Z designed the study; KZ, XD L, SY T, ZZ W, and JZ Z searched relevant studies; JY L and WC analysed and interpreted the data; KZ wrote the manuscript; and YZ Z and ZY H approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingze Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Implementation of this study was agreed by the Institutional Review Board of Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University.

Consent to participate

All patients provided informed consent prior to participating.

Consent for publication

Informed consent for publication was obtained from all patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, K., Lian, X., Tian, S. et al. Traction methods in the retrograde intramedullary nailing of femur shaft fractures: the double reverse traction repositor or manual traction. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 2711–2718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04961-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04961-2

Keywords

Navigation