Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interchangeable neck failures of bi-modular femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty cannot be predicted from serum trace element analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Revision of a well-fixed stem due to unexpected modular neck fracture is a catastrophe for the patient and a challenge for the surgeon. This study aimed to test the possibility of predicting interchangeable neck fracture from serum levels of the stem/neck alloy-consisting metals.

Materials and methods

Nineteen patients at high risk for interchangeable neck fracture were randomly selected out of a cohort of 680 bimodular stems made from Ti6Al4V alloy. Serum levels of titanium, aluminium and vanadium were determined. Nine age- and gender-matched patients were used as controls.

Results

Mean serum levels of Ti were 6.04 ± 2.52 μg/L, of Al 3.89 ± 1.68 μg/L and of V 0.07 ± 0.04 μg/L in the high-risk group, and 8.22 ± 4.74 μg/L, 4.99 ± 3.98 μg/L and 0.27 ± 0.44 μg/L in the low-risk group, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups.

Discussion

Interchangeable neck fracture of bimodular femoral stems cannot be predicted from serum trace element analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright C, Sporer S, Urban R, Jacobs J (2010) Fracture of a modular femoral neck after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(6):1518–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerhardt DM, Bisseling P, de Visser E, van Susante JL (2014) Modular necks in primary hip arthroplasty without anatomical deformity: no clear benefit on restoration of hip geometry and dislocation rate. An exploratory study. J Arthroplast 29(8):1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kovač S, Mavčič B, Kotnik M, Levašič V, Sirše M, Fokter S (2019) What factors are associated with neck fracture in one commonly used bimodular THA design? A multicenter, nationwide study in Slovenia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477(6):1324–1332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zajc J, Predan J, Gubeljak N, Moličnik A, Fokter S (2018) Modular femoral neck failure after revision of a total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(3):717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duwelius P, Burkhart B, Carnahan C, Branam G, Ko L, Wu Y, Froemke C, Wang L, Grunkemeier G (2013) Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(4):1240–1245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pelayo-de-Tomás J, Rodrigo-Pérez J, Novoa-Parra C, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Morales-Suárez-Varela M, Blas-Dobón J (2017) Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(3):463–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Toni A, Giardina F, Guerra G, Sudanese A, Montalti M, Stea S, Bordini B (2016) 3rd generation alumina-on-alumina in modular hip prosthesis: 13 to 18 years follow-up results. Hip Int 27(1):8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitch DA, Ancarani C, Bordini B (2015) Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement. Int Orthop 39(9):1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2894-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanbiervliet J, Somers JFA (2017) Excellent mid-term results of a new polished tapered modular cemented stem: a study of 113 hip replacements with minimum 5-year follow-up. Hip Int 27(5):455–459. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000486

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fokter S, Levašič V, Kovač S (2017) The inovation trap: modular neck in total hip arthroplasty. Zdrav Vest 86:115–126 (accessible on: https://vestnik.szd.si/index.php/ZdravVest/article/view/2156)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colas S, Allalou A, Poichotte A, Piriou P, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M (2017) Exchangeable femoral neck (dual-modular) THA prostheses have poorer survivorship than other designs: a nationwide cohort of 324,108 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(8):2046–2059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lex JR, Welch MD, Abbas S, Edwards TC, Stavropoulos NA, Babis GC (2020) Systematic review of primary total hip arthroplasty using titanium-titanium modular-neck prostheses: the true risk of revision. Hip Int 16:1120700020916870

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharan D (1999) The problem of corrosion in orthopaedic implant materials. Orthopaedic Update (India) 9(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fokter S, Moličnik A, Kavalar R, Pelicon P, Rudolf R, Gubeljak N (2017) Why do some titanium-alloy total hip arthroplasty modular necks fail? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:107–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Weiskopf J, Rodriguez JA, Skipor AK, Jacobs JJ (2006) Serum metal levels and bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21(6 Suppl 2):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elmallah RK, Cherian JJ, Meneghini RM, Hozack WJ, Westrich GH, Mont MA (2016) How to approach a recalled dual modular hip implant: an update. J Arthroplast 31(11):2646–2652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwon YM, Tsai TY, Leone WA, Liow MHL (2017) Sensitivity and specificity of metal ion levels in predicting “pseudotumors” due to taper corrosion in patients with dual taper modular total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(3):996–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ (2013) Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt-chromium modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(10):865–872

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Norman P, Iyengar S, Svensson I, Flivik G (2014) Fatigue fracture in dual modular revision total hip arthroplasty stems: failure analysis and computed tomography diagnostics in two cases. J Arthroplast 29(4):850–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fokter SK, Rudolf R, Moličnik A (2016) Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture--clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases. Acta Orthop 87(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1047289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barlow BT, Ortiz PA, Boles JW, Lee YY, Padgett DE, Westrich GH (2017) What are normal metal ion levels after total hip arthroplasty? A serologic analysis of four bearing surfaces. J Arthroplast 32(5):1535–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Omlor GW, Kretzer JP, Reinders J, Streit MR, Bruckner T, Gotterbarm T, Aldinger PR, Merle C (2013) In vivo serum titanium ion levels following modular neck total hip arthroplasty--10 year results in 67 patients. Acta Biomater 9(4):6278–6282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morlock MM, Bünte D, Ettema H, Verheyen CC, Hamberg Å, Gilbert J (2016) Primary hip replacement stem taper fracture due to corrosion in 3 patients. Acta Orthop 87(2):189–192. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1128780

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the senior author’s institution (Grant No. IRP-2017/01-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samo K. Fokter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from the patients included in the study.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained to perform this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fokter, S.K., Zajc, J. & Merc, M. Interchangeable neck failures of bi-modular femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty cannot be predicted from serum trace element analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 877–881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04812-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04812-6

Keywords

Navigation