Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 10, pp 2415–2423 | Cite as

Cuff tear arthropathy in the nineteenth century: ‘chronic rheumatic arthritis’ with ‘partial luxation upwards’ of the humeral head

  • Stig BrorsonEmail author
Orthopaedic Heritage
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Cuff tear arthropathy of the shoulder is a common indication for insertion of an increasing number of reverse shoulder arthroplasties. It is widely believed that this condition was unknown to medical practitioners and writers prior to the introduction of the term cuff tear arthropathy by Charles Neer in 1977.

Purpose

To search nineteenth-century written sources for pathoanatomical and biomechanical descriptions of the typical changes found in cuff tear arthropathy.

Methods

A historical review. Nineteenth-century medical textbooks, reviews, case series, autopsy reports and illustrations were systematically searched and retrieved for relevance. References were hand-searched. Illustrations were reproduced and interpreted.

Results

A richly illustrated nineteenth-century literature was identified. The typical changes in cuff tear arthropathy were termed ‘chronic rheumatic arthritis’ of the shoulder with ‘partial luxation upwards’ of the humeral head and interpreted within a pathoanatomical and biomechanical framework. Detailed descriptions and illustrations of massive rotator cuff tears, biceps pathology and the osseous changes were identified and presented.

Conclusion

The pathoanatomical and biomechanical changes later termed cuff tear arthropathy were well understood and nicely described in nineteenth-century medical literature.

Keywords

Cuff tear arthropathy Rotator cuff tear Long head of biceps Femoralization Acetabularization Neer Nineteenth-century 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Neer CS, Cruess RL, Sledge CB, Wilde AH (1977) Total glenohumeral replacement. A preliminary report. Orthop Trans 1:244–245Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neer CS, Craig EV, Fukuda H (1983) Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1232–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smee A (1845) Dissection of a partial dislocation of the shoulder upwards. Lancet 1:323–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams R (1857) A treatise on rheumatic gout or chronic rheumatic arthritis of all the joints. John Churchill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams R (1857) Illustrations of the effects of rheumatic gout, or chcronic rheumatic arthritis. John Churchill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith RW (1853) Observations upon chronic rheumatic arthritis of the shoulder (Plates). Hodges and Smith, DublinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen KL, Williams GR, Russell IJ, Rockwood CA (1999) Current concepts review - rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1312–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith JG (1834) Pathological appearances of seven cases of injury of the shoulder-joint. London Med Gaz 14:280–285Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Canton E (1849) Chronic rheumatic arthritis. London Med Gaz or. J Pract Med VIII:958–959Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canton E (1855) Surgical and pathological observations. Samuel Highley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y (1990) Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin OrthopRelat Res 254:92-96Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Visotsky JL, Basamania C, Seebauer L et al (2004) Cuff tear arthropathy: pathogenesis, classification, and algorithm for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am - Ser A-Suppl 2:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandifort E, Sandifort G (1793) Museum anatomicum Academiae Lugduno-Batavae. Samuel Luchtmans, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryZealand University HospitalKoegeDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations