Tibiofemoral dislocation after primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
- 41 Downloads
Tibiofemoral dislocation is the most serious form of instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is little reported in the literature, despite severity comparable to that in the native knee. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors and treatment strategies.
The Cochrane, Medline (via PubMed), Google, and PROSPERO data-bases were searched in January 2018 following the PRISMA meta-analysis guidelines. All articles referring to tibiofemoral dislocation following primary TKA were included for analysis and extraction of individual data. Study data comprised age, gender, comorbidities, primary and revision implant design, aetiology, and treatment strategy.
Individual data for 57 patients (23 studies) were analyzed. A total of 62.0% of primary implants were posterior-stabilized (49 patients) and 30.4% posterior-cruciate-retaining (24 patients). Obesity was the most frequent comorbidity (39.2%; 31 patients), followed by severe pre-operative deformity (31.6%; 25 patients). Aetiologies of dislocation were mainly related to comorbidity (15 studies; 65.2%) or intra-operative iatrogenic destabilization (14 studies; 60.9%). Non-operative treatment (splint) after dislocation was associated with high rates of recurrence (39.1%) but significantly fewer complications (p = 0.033). Implant revision surgery (45 patients; 80.4%) usually involved higher-constraint models (31 patients; 70.8%).
Improved implant design has reduced the rate of tibiofemoral dislocation, although this complication remains serious in both the short and the long term. The present review identified patient- and surgeon-related risk factors. Awareness of the former, which are identifiable pre-operatively, and of the most frequent technical errors is critical.
KeywordsKnee dislocation Tibiofemoral Total knee arthroplasty Complication Meta-analysis
Acknowledgments to Myriam Galvin (Clinical Research Assistant).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.UK National Joint Registry (2018) www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed 11 Dec 2017
- 2.U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2018) HCUPnet. www.hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. Accessed 04 Nov 2017
- 3.The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) (2017) Annual Reports www.aoanjrr.sahmri.com/fr/annual-reports-2017/. Accessed 29 Nov 2017
- 6.Peters CL (2006) Soft-tissue balancing in primary total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 55:413–417Google Scholar
- 7.Meloni MC, Hoedemaeker RW, Violante B (2014) Soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Joints 2:37–40Google Scholar
- 13.Parratte S, Pagnano MW (2008) Instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:184–194Google Scholar
- 15.Maslaris A, Brinkmann O, Bungartz M et al (2018) Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: what is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2148-4
- 20.Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Booth RE et al (1992) Posterior dislocation of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop:128–133Google Scholar
- 28.Wazir NN, Shan Y, Mukundala VV, Gunalan R (2007) Dislocation after total knee arthroplasty. Singap Med J 48:e138–e140Google Scholar
- 29.Bron JL, Saouti R, De Gast A (2007) Posterior knee dislocation after total knee arthroplasty in a patient with multiple sclerosis. A case report. Acta Orthop Belg 73:118–121Google Scholar
- 32.Su Y-P, Chiu F-Y, Chen T-H (2003) Posterior dislocation after posterior stabilization TKA. J Chin Med Assoc 66:120–122Google Scholar
- 38.Bargren JH (1980) Total knee dislocation due to rotatory malalignment of tibial component: a case report. Clin Orthop:271–274Google Scholar
- 48.Jeffcote B, Nicholls R, Schirm A, Kuster MS (2007) The variation in medial and lateral collateral ligament strain and tibiofemoral forces following changes in the flexion and extension gaps in total knee replacement. A laboratory experiment using cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1528–1533. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.18834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Dejour H, Walch G, Peyrot J, Eberhard P (1988) The natural history of rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74:35–43Google Scholar
- 50.Mazzucchelli L, Deledda D, Rosso F et al (2016) Cruciate retaining and cruciate substituting ultra-congruent insert. Ann Transl Med 4. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.12.52