The role of the subscapularis tendon in a lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: repair versus nonrepair
- 27 Downloads
The reverse shoulder prost hesis (rTSA) is now implanted by the same percentage of anatomic shoulder prosthesis in the USA. Scapular notching and loss of extrarotation have been underlined as complication at long-term follow-up due to the Grammont design. The current trend to reduce those limits is to position both components lateralized. As the role of the subscapularis tendon in this new rTSA design is unclear, the purpose of this study is to quantify rTSA outcomes in patients with or without subscapularis tendon suture.
The surgery was performed by the same orthopaedic surgeon (F.F.), using a Aequalis Ascend™ Flex prosthesis (Tornier, Montbonnot, France) with a bone autograft.
Forty-four patients underwent surgery with the tendon sutured, whereas 40 patients underwent the same surgery without repairing it.
Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at the last follow-up using Constant score, VAS, and ROM. The minimum and mean follow-ups were six and 16.6 months, respectively.
All patients showed statistically significant improvement in pain and joint function following surgery. This study highlighted significant higher values in intrarotation and abduction, respectively, with and without suturing the subscapularis tendon.
However, no significant differences were underlined in Constant score, VAS, forward flexion, extrarotation at 0° and 90° of abduction, and rate of instability.
As predicted, significant clinical improvements were observed in both groups with some differences.
These clinical results showed that the use of rTSA with lateralized humerus and bony increase offset leads to realistic clinical improvements with a low risk of instability without the need for compression and stabilization of the tendon.
KeywordsReverse total shoulder arthroplasty Subscapularis tendon Cuff tear arthropathy
Likewise, not repairing the tendon with a lateralized humerus does not result in higher scores or greater range of motion.
Moreover, no difference was observed in the rates of complications between patients with or without suture.
The difference of the designs (lateral versus medial) used can partially explain the contradictory results in the scientific literature.
Longer follow-ups, greater number of patients, and multiple score use are important to confirm our results.
A potential future study on the role of the subscapularis in the rTSA should stratify all patients undergoing surgery performed by the same surgeon in four groups according to the prosthetic design (Grammont design, medial glenosphere and lateral humerus, lateral glenosphere and medial humerus, both lateral).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Gallo RA, Gamradt SC, Mattern CJ, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Dines DM, Warren RF, Sports M Shoulder Service at the Hospital for Special Surgery NYNY (2011) Instability after reverse total shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(4):584–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Clark JC, Ritchie J, Song FS, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Hart ND, Hawkins RJ (2012) Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Routman HD (2013) The role of subscapularis repair in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 71(Suppl 2):108–112Google Scholar
- 21.Raiss P, Zeifang F, Pons-Villanueva J, Smithers CJ, Loew M, Walch G (2014) Reverse arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rotator cuff deficiency after previous surgery for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Int Orthop 38(7):1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2325-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Onstot B, Suslak A, Colley R, Jacofsky M, Otis J, Hansen M (2012) Consequences of concomitant subscapularis repair with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In: Transaction of the 58th Annual ORS MeetingGoogle Scholar
- 27.Katz D, Valenti P, Kany J, Elkholti K, Werthel JD (2016) Does lateralisation of the centre of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoid scapular notching? Clinical and radiological review of one hundred and forty cases with forty five months of follow-up. Int Orthop 40(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2976-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Goutallier D, Postel J-M, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin M-C (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre-and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res (304):78–83Google Scholar
- 34.Constant C,Murley A (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res (214):160-164Google Scholar
- 35.Hansen ML, Nayak A, Narayanan MS, Worhacz K, Stowell R, Jacofsky MC, Roche CP (2015) Role of subscapularis repair on muscle force requirements with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 73(Suppl 1):S21–S27Google Scholar
- 36.Roche C, Diep P, Hamilton M, Wright T, Flurin P, Zuckerman J, Routman H Asymmetric tensioning of the rotator cuff by changing humeral retroversion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In: Transactions of the 59th Annual ORS Meeting. San Antonio, Texas, p 2013Google Scholar
- 37.Roche C, Diep P, Hamilton M, Wright T, Flurin P, Zuckerman J, Routman H Biomechanical analysis of 3 commercially available reverse shoulder designs in a normal and medially eroded scapula. In: 59th Annual Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting. San Antonio, Texas, p 2013Google Scholar